Open 86 - Lovers Multiball (Game Over)

[WaltWishbone]

NO, its not obvious, please explain?

[armlx]

SP is my lover.

I really don't see how you don't understand what I'm saying.

1. I am online right now.
2. I'm pretty sure I will be online again before the deadline.
3. I'm not compelled to move my vote form HP to elsewhere.

[WaltWishbone]

SP is my lover.

I really don't see how you don't understand what I'm saying.

1. I am online right now.
2. I'm pretty sure I will be online again before the deadline.
3. I'm not compelled to move my vote form HP to elsewhere.

okay number one

what does "this" mean? Why is your vote there?

number two#

Why do you keep writting crazy is "confirmed" town, when most the town is not sure it is true? You seem to want to have a pissing contest about it, so lets have it!

[armlx]

I'm just completely befuddle by what you are trying to say/do here Walt.....

[WaltWishbone]

I'm just completely befuddle by what you are trying to say/do here Walt.....

As usual.

Can't catch a fish if he won't take the bait.

[WaltWishbone]

Armix, can you please explain why we should lynch HarveyPew since he has made his remarks addressing Townies concerns?

[ThAdmiral]

@ThAdmiral - That's not a great analogy. Three things; this is not in real time, I have been away for the last 48 hours and could have been hung by the time I returned without a say in the matter. Second, a defendent does not have the right to question his prosecuter for the same crime in a court of law. Lastly, a response may also contain the same tone or redundancy in order to ellciit a reaction as someone who asked the question in the first place. Get it yet?

Taking the analogy a bit too seriously.

TO ALL: I don't know where darla is either. I would also like her to post more. However - I don't really see why this makes us seem scummy. Why does more active = town? I'm trying to get on and talk as much as possible, but I am also trying to enjoy my holiday in new york - hence you may not get as much out of me as other people.

[WaltWishbone]

@ThAdmiral - That's not a great analogy. Three things; this is not in real time, I have been away for the last 48 hours and could have been hung by the time I returned without a say in the matter. Second, a defendent does not have the right to question his prosecuter for the same crime in a court of law. Lastly, a response may also contain the same tone or redundancy in order to ellciit a reaction as someone who asked the question in the first place. Get it yet?

Taking the analogy a bit too seriously.

TO ALL: I don't know where darla is either. I would also like her to post more. However - I don't really see why this makes us seem scummy. Why does more active = town? I'm trying to get on and talk as much as possible, but I am also trying to enjoy my holiday in new york - hence you may not get as much out of me as other people.

You asked.

[Toaster Strudel]

...she DIDNT read or she would have known I wanted to hang werewolves...

So according to you, who are the wolves and why?

[WaltWishbone]

...she DIDNT read or she would have known I wanted to hang werewolves...

So according to you, who are the wolves and why?

I really don't know, thats why I have not voted. My best read is from the four who did not vote for them.... and you are right all four couples should have pressure. But I'm just not gonna ask a lame question or vote for someone to start a discussion/debate. I need to reread some things.

[WaltWishbone]

To clarify, you are right to pressure people (not just the 4 werewolf supsect couples, imo).

[Raging Rabbit]

Harvey, in case it wasn't obvious, I expected you to

explain

your actions rather than just repeat with more words the general statement that voting for the wrong person doesn't make you scum. From the top of my head:

1.

Why

did you suddenly feel you made a "mistake" about Fire? Didn't his odd vote for me look scummy anymore?
2.

Why

did you believe Iceman's slip was an innocent mistake?
3.

Why

do you think Crazy's confusion about his DT tell was made up?

[Toaster Strudel]

I'm beginning to think that Harvey is scum that's given up.

[Knight of Cydonia]

And if I may:

4. Why is RR's case against you "weak and reaching"? Examples from his big case post, with quote evidence, would be appreciated.

[Harvey Pew]

I'm beginning to think that Harvey is scum that's given up.

No, I'm town that has given up.

[armlx]

Walt, the main issue is HP's behavior towards FS. The rest is how he has really failed to make any adequate defense, resorting to appeal to emotion and other techniques.

[sekinj]

@HP: Can you respond to this question please? I believe this is one of the only important questions that you have not addressed adequately. if this is intentional, please let me know why you believe the question is not legitimate.

@HP: The question I have for you is why do you think you made a mistake voting for Fire the first time? You say you forgot why you did it. Don't you remember that Fire made a vote against RR out of the blue with no evidence? and since we didn't even know that ice was his lover, therefore he was just tryign to deflect attention, it looks even more scummy? Is that a bad reason to vote for someone?

Thank you!

[SleepyPanda]

TO ALL: I don't know where darla is either. I would also like her to post more. However - I don't really see why this makes us seem scummy. Why does more active = town? I'm trying to get on and talk as much as possible, but I am also trying to enjoy my holiday in new york - hence you may not get as much out of me as other people.

It's not entirely based on just activity that makes you two scummy. Even though she is V/LA, she can still read, right? She has done almost zero scumhunting. With her last two votes (for iceman and HP, she didn't vote Day 2), both times, she said she had a longer post, but the site had an error and it disappeared. With no follow up, it's basically placing a vote with no reason at all. I would even buy "I'm just following my lover" than the excuse she has given. I would still like to hear her reasons for her votes, but I'm guessing she'll say something like she forgot.

[Battle Mage]

I'm beginning to think that Harvey is scum that's given up.

No, I'm town that has given up.

join the club.

BM

[Raging Rabbit]

BM, have you read the whole game yet?

[Battle Mage]

well i would apologise for my absence, but it seems i havent missed much. No Lover, No response to my accusation on Crazy/KoC. *cries*

BM

This is where i'm at. I dont see alot of point me continuing reading when you're the only person who knows i'm here, and you're not being totally helpful.

BM

[Raging Rabbit]

People will take you more seriously when you're read through and see the same picture we see. Your case on Crazy is perceived as lacking because you don't have the same amount of info we have, and is thus ignored. If you want yourself heard you should acknowledge the reasons we think Crazy is innocent despite his odd behavior early in the game, but it appears you don't even know them yet.

[Battle Mage]

People will take you more seriously when you're read through and see the same picture we see. Your case on Crazy is perceived as lacking because you don't have the same amount of info we have, and is thus ignored. If you want yourself heard you should acknowledge the reasons we think Crazy is innocent despite his odd behavior early in the game, but it appears you don't even know them yet.

Maybe i'd be able to acknowledge them, if they were specifically addressed to me. Telling me to read the thread is 1 thing, but rarely does a cursory glance at every single post tell you everything you need to know. This is why rereading is no substitute for being around for the whole game. That's why i'd like a specific part area pointed out to me, because clearly it is not the entire thread that you are referring to, and i dont really want to do the whole needle-haystack routine.

BM

[Cephrir]

Eh, it's been mentioned quite a few times.

[Battle Mage]

helpful.