Noticed Morning Tweet posted this banger. Love Kiznaiver's OP theme. I thought Kiznaiver had some really good ideas going on behind it, and the classic Trigger animation/energy to go with it. But I wasn't entirely convinced by the execution in the end. Think Trigger should stick with their high octane action flicks instead of delving into Mari Okada style love dodecahedron stories.In post 1347, Morning Tweet wrote:
Re: PrivateI
Think PrivateI's analysis is definitely way beyond surface level. Goes deep and they've really given clear thoughts to the game. You've also commented on your analysis into Zaiden vs Cheetory and Pink Ball vs Spring Breeze interactions, which I think have been the high profile ones in this game so far. And you're offering unique perspectives that don't just come down to following a consensus. Your thought progressions are mostly clear, though there are some leaps in logic where I believe you attempted to infer things to try and close some gaps? Some of them I follow, some I don't. At least none of those leaps compare to Jake allegedly town-leaning Nora in 294 for saying 'PEACHES ARE SUPERIOR' as PrivateI quite correctly points out as being confusing. For now I'm upgrading from null to town-lean because even on the points I don't entirely agree with, I can see where they're trying to come from.
From my perspective Nora defending me when I was getting wagon'd and being emotionally re-assuring felt quite genuine. Not that it's alignment indicative per se. But I don't think it was 'fake'. Or maybe I want to pretend it's real because I'd honestly be pretty heartbroken if it was all a ruse. Nora seemed nice enough. I thought I'd weigh in with some insight on those sets of interactions because it directly involved me.
Some questions.
Why are third votes on a wagon bad? I was under the impression you eventually want to third vote to generate pressure on someone and get people talking. If third votes are an inevitable progression from RVS why are they frowned upon? (I guess this can also be more of a general question)
Is random chaotic bad? From my experience with people who behave chaotic/random in real life, it's more like you can't be sure of your guess. Sometimes they could be town? Sometimes they could be scum. Although I believe people here have played games with Nora and would be better informed on reading them. But I don't think it means they're certified scum. Although I'll feel really stupid if they've actually run me in circles. (I guess this is also more of a general question)
What about Spring Breeze qualifies as a townlean when the general consensus seems to be that they're not pulling their weight in this game? You even said yourself 191 reads bad, then you agree with their Cakez read. But surely that balances out to a null? What do you make of SpringBreeze's recent set of reads?
Also if you agree with Spring Breeze's argument in the 191 post, any idea what you felt the ping could have been? Or is that something you don't know and are speculating this is how scum!Cakez operates? For now I will be speculating that it's because you said you scumlean PinkBall. So do you rationalise PinkBall's push onto Spring Breeze as scum trying to pressure an wagon onto your townlean? Also, do you think they have some legitimate points about Spring Breeze's contributions so far in this game? From my perspective, I do think the push was quite non-committal but I thought Pink Ball raised some good points and decided to follow it up. Barring exceptional developments, I plan on voting Spring Breeze if they don't get back to me sometime soon.
