This is clearly unrelated comments and appeals to emotion.Harvey Pew wrote:Knight, here is a select from your rational and so logical posts:Knight of Cydonia wrote:Are you ever going to post anything mroe than un-related comments and appeals to emotion?
I really don't like Adel
your annoying, worthless and frankly scummy one-liners
unease
I'm not saying he's scummy in any way, other than the fact he's been unhelpful.
doesn't exactly engender confidence
it's more a mixture of gut... and a bone-deep mistrust
It just makes me a little wary
I don't like Adel and pwnz much
slightly lurking
I'm not happy
You are much more liable to emotion and flabby nebulous reasoing than myself. To try and dismiss everything I write as an appeal to emotion is incorrect andintentionally misleading:
vote: Crazy
You made this statement before. It was incorrect then. It is incorrect now.armlx wrote:This, and voting confirmed town isn't good either.
Why in the world would scum have done something so outrageously stupid, with full knowledge how stupid it was? It was a fluke that I wasn't lynched.Harvey Pew wrote:You made this statement before. It was incorrect then. It is incorrect now.armlx wrote:This, and voting confirmed town isn't good either.There are no confirmed town, the most you can possibly say is Crazy is not-werewolf on the balance of probabilities. Youcannotpress that claim any further and to claim Crazy caught IcePenguin is wildly misleading. I have re-read Crazy's posts and there is no evidence of that at all.
That's bad logic. The point is, for me to be scum, I would have had to have been pretending to be stupid, because I would have had to know that they daytalk tell would fail.sekinj wrote:I disagree with the confirmed town agruement. confirmed stupid /= confirmed town.
See, it would be stupid, but not impossible. I mean, ever heard of a scum gambit?That's bad logic. The point is, for me to be scum, I would have had to have been pretending to be stupid, because I would have had to know that they daytalk tell would fail.
Now tell me, as scum, why the heck would I do that?
This is correct. That is why I am only "mostly" cleared.neko2086 wrote:See, it would be stupid, but not impossible. I mean, ever heard of a scum gambit?That's bad logic. The point is, for me to be scum, I would have had to have been pretending to be stupid, because I would have had to know that they daytalk tell would fail.
Now tell me, as scum, why the heck would I do that?
This is simply not true. Apologies as I haven't been contributing much to this game lately (I hope to be able to do a big reread this weekend though). You've given a reason in your post. If you make yourself appear dumb, then people will be more likely to think you're town (as you've said yourself). This is actually a pretty interesting scum strategy.Crazy wrote:That's bad logic. The point is, for me to be scum, I would have had to have been pretending to be stupid, because I would have had to know that they daytalk tell would fail.sekinj wrote:I disagree with the confirmed town agruement. confirmed stupid /= confirmed town.
Now tell me, as scum, why the heck would I do that?
Nah, I don't think so. If they wanted self-preservation, then they'd just vote HP.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Actually, I'd say it's charter + lover(soon enough) jumping on the HP + cerebus(soon, I expect) hopeful wagon on me and Crazy. I smell something lupine in the air.
I don't feel the need to defend us against completely unfounded accusations, based on a pile of appeals to emotion and accusations founded on something which has been explained pretty bloody well and dismissed D1. Basing a case on that scum-tell is more scummy, IMHO - it looks as if you're trying to dig up any old wagon in an act of desperate self-preservation.
If we fucking needed self preservation we'd do that. It's just something KoC has made up in his head, or has somehow been convinced by Darox.Crazy wrote:Nah, I don't think so. If they wanted self-preservation, then they'd just vote HP.Knight of Cydonia wrote:Actually, I'd say it's charter + lover(soon enough) jumping on the HP + cerebus(soon, I expect) hopeful wagon on me and Crazy. I smell something lupine in the air.
I don't feel the need to defend us against completely unfounded accusations, based on a pile of appeals to emotion and accusations founded on something which has been explained pretty bloody well and dismissed D1. Basing a case on that scum-tell is more scummy, IMHO - it looks as if you're trying to dig up any old wagon in an act of desperate self-preservation.
