If you can declare yourself to be the winner of a staring contest, I can declare your role pm to be red!In post 674, Noraa wrote:*crosses my arms*
*does a staring contest with infinity*
*wins*
*runs off to get a cookie*
In post 418, Momrangal wrote:It isn't inherently scummy looking to have a new account and to ask to be treated like someone who doesn't know the game because, they probably don't. The issue is that she didn't play the part making it apparent that she knows exactly what she's doing
Jesus christ I'm not an alt, why is everyone so hyperfixated on me allegedly being an alt. Like I don't want to bring out of game into it but its plain to see that I'm not an alt.In post 626, Momrangal wrote:This is the only actual evidence against what ive actually been saying though.In post 517, Noraa wrote:I recently played a game with a Hectic alt. He claimed he was a newbie on the alt and then used a lot of fancy terms. He was town. What does that tell us?In post 418, Momrangal wrote:It isn't inherently scummy looking to have a new account and to ask to be treated like someone who doesn't know the game because, they probably don't. The issue is that she didn't play the part making it apparent that she knows exactly what she's doing
It tells us that doing this type of weird shenanigans isn't necessarily scum indicative. Like it looks pretty bad and her's actually looks worse than Hectic cuz Hectic was trying harder to mask the xp. But I do still think its TSTBS.
I would ask for the game, but I probably won't have the time to read it. It does also explain your stance against it
She's pretty much scumreading a bunch of inactives and townreading the players who are doing anything (this was already pointed out by vaxkiller). And posts like 481 are in my opinion, really terrible.In post 301, DrippingGoofball wrote:TOWN
DrippingGoofball
JacksonVirgo
Guillotina
Marky Mark
Horsewoman
Flea the Magician
NULL
AGamblingPig
Nono
Momrangal
SCUM
Toogeloo
Noraa
LlamaMama
no elim
This post pings me. I get it if she's using other players as analogy, but noraa definitely does "get down to business" as either alignment. The reason why I think it might be scummy is that mara is approaching this personality-read with a lot of confidence for someone who doesn't know noraa, so I'm wondering if she misevaluated how much confidence town would have in this situation.In post 270, Momrangal wrote:Its to my understanding that Nora is a cutesy overly excited kind of player... Like a puppy but in this game it doesn't seem over the top, and it feels like there's a level of focus and seriousness there. It's almost like she needs to actually some thinking in the game, and not make plays to redirect town votes, and plays, and cause havic.In post 255, Guillotina wrote:Why?In post 249, Momrangal wrote:I think your read on Nora is off though
There is something happening to cause this subtle shift in play at a subconscious level and it's that thing at that level that gives me my read on her
There's a built-in bias in early games where prolific players are more likely to drop town tells because they post more, and for less prolific players who drop scumtells not to have redeemed themselves yet if they are town. I am aware of that and revise my reads as the game advances.In post 678, Horsewoman wrote:I dont love DGB either. Look at this reads list.
She's pretty much scumreading a bunch of inactives and townreading the players who are doing anything (this was already pointed out by vaxkiller). And posts like 481 are in my opinion, really terrible.
This is a decent argument for why momrangal might be wrong, but not why she's scummy.In post 680, Infinity 324 wrote:This post pings me. I get it if she's using other players as analogy, but noraa definitely does "get down to business" as either alignment. The reason why I think it might be scummy is that mara is approaching this personality-read with a lot of confidence for someone who doesn't know noraa, so I'm wondering if she misevaluated how much confidence town would have in this situation.In post 270, Momrangal wrote:Its to my understanding that Nora is a cutesy overly excited kind of player... Like a puppy but in this game it doesn't seem over the top, and it feels like there's a level of focus and seriousness there. It's almost like she needs to actually some thinking in the game, and not make plays to redirect town votes, and plays, and cause havic.In post 255, Guillotina wrote:Why?In post 249, Momrangal wrote:I think your read on Nora is off though
There is something happening to cause this subtle shift in play at a subconscious level and it's that thing at that level that gives me my read on her
VOTE: mom
Scum try to project confidence to make it look like they believe in their reads, and I find that they often do it in situations where town wouldn't because they misevaluate how they would feel as town. Town only projects confidence when they really feel it, but scum has to keep up a veneer if that makes sense.In post 683, Horsewoman wrote:This is a decent argument for why momrangal might be wrong, but not why she's scummy.
JV said it better than me.In post 549, JacksonVirgo wrote:Although I hate the way you worded this, I like this read but I'm not sure if it comes from scum wanting to get out of a pickle or Town actively reading them.
