Mini 663 - Mind Screw Mafia II - Over

[DragonsofSummer]

Why do you think speculating is anti-town?

[Natirasha]

Am I the only one who thinks that this game is nightless?

unvote

, by the way.

[DragonsofSummer]

I think tar is trying to make that painfully obvious with the release of the information of FAQ 12.

[DrippingGoofball]

I sent in my choice. My choice is sent during the DAY. I receive an answer at the END OF THE DAY. Whenever that is. I should find out how it works soon enough.

[DrippingGoofball]

In light of my role my best guess is that the game is nightless.

[iamausername]

Guys, I think the game might be nightless!

malthusis, 'counterclaiming' is pointless when it's quite possible for two people to have roles from the same source, and WE. ARE. NOT. DOING. A. NAMECLAIM.

My role comes from Battlestar Galactica.

[iamausername]

Also, if Tar is a player, whe have twelve, and normal rules would make it 7 to lynch. Somthing to think about.

Now, who thinks we should do a mass nameclaim? I vote no, but it's possible I could be convinced to change my mind if someone has a good reason.

[Jebus]

Unvote: DrippingGoofball

Okay, I completely discredit the earlier idea now. So, DG, let me get this straight. You only get to use your 'lie-detector' ability for one post only and at night only?

And just a thought: Flash-night (eg, night actions are sent before the end of day, and night lasts for as long as it takes Tar to post the results)

And another: maybe there's no mafia at all? 0_o

[Wall-E]

The question of whether there is mafia or not is immaterial. The only sane thing to do is assume there IS mafia and act accordingly.

[Tarhalindur]

Point of Order!

"I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change. I don't know the future. I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it's going to begin. I'm going to hang up this phone, and then I'm going to show these people what you don't want them to see. I'm going to show them a world ... without you. A world without rules and controls, without borders or boundaries. A world where anything is possible. Where we go from there is a choice I leave to you."

The Twentieth Vote Count (aka the "When Subtlety Fails, Use The Sledgehammer" Vote Count):

Vote Count:

iamausername (0)
malthusis (0)
Jebus (6) - Cyberbob, iamausername, dahill1, malthusis, DragonsofSummer
dahill1 (0)
Cyberbob (0)
DrippingGoofball (0)
DragonsofSummer (2) - DrippingGoofball
MafiaSSK (0)
Natirasha (0)
Wall-E (0)
Battousai (0)

Not Voting (5): Battousai, MafiaSSK, Wall-E, Jebus, Natirasha

Votes required to lynch: ???

FoS Count:

iamausername (0)
malthusis (1) - Natirasha
Jebus (0) - malthusis
dahill1 (1) - MafiaSSK
Cyberbob (0)
DrippingGoofball (1) - Battousai
DragonsofSummer (1) - Cyberbob
MafiaSSK (0)
Natirasha (1) - Tarhalindur
Wall-E (2) - Jebus, DragonsofSummer
Battousai (0)

Not FoS'ing (4) - iamausername, dahill1, DrippingGoofball, Wall-E

Current Deadline:

???

End Point of Order!

[Battousai]

I'm definately not in favor of a mass Name Claim on D1. I don't think it really calls for it.

I also do not think there is a fake claimer. The number for a lynch is hidden, so we don't even know we need a majority. However, with 12 shown players there's probably 3 scum, so I think at most we need 9 votes to lynch.

HOS:DoS

, if majority was required, then he would have hammered Jebus, who I feel isn't scummy enough for a lynch and hasn't claimed yet to defend her/himself. All she/he did lately was make a mistake by not knowing what a lie detector does.


*I'm doing homework right now, so I only have time to do a brief post about the happenings. My next post should be better.

[Battousai]

Who's voting MafiaSSK?

Cyberbob, your post does seem opportunistic, along with Wall-E. Condoning a hammer during twilight is scummy

FOS: Cyberbob and Wall-E

DoS, why wouldn't you say that line from DGB in its entirety until DGB claimed? I know you don't want to blindly follow DGB, but if it's truthful, it doesn't harm you or the town. If your scum, it can only hurt you if DGB is a lie detector.

[DrippingGoofball]

Unvote: DrippingGoofball

Okay, I completely discredit the earlier idea now. So, DG, let me get this straight. You only get to use your 'lie-detector' ability for one post only and at night only?

And just a thought: Flash-night (eg, night actions are sent before the end of day, and night lasts for as long as it takes Tar to post the results)

And another: maybe there's no mafia at all? 0_o

Any post during any day. But I can only make one selection per day. I get my result at the end of the day. No mention of "night" anything.

[DragonsofSummer]

I just don't like to be told what to do. So if I feel what I am being told has no purpose I won't do it. Which is why as soon as I had a reason for doing it (DGB's Claim) I did. Its just a personal thing.

I can confirm what DGB is saying. My ability makes no mention of night either. I send one choice in per day and get a result at the end of the day.

[Cyberbob]

Cyberbob, your post does seem opportunistic, along with Wall-E. Condoning a hammer during twilight is scummy.

Condoning

a hammer? Good grief. I did no such thing, and neither did Wall-E.

Unless you're looking for some other word?

[Jebus]

Unvote: DrippingGoofball

Okay, I completely discredit the earlier idea now. So, DG, let me get this straight. You only get to use your 'lie-detector' ability for one post only and at night only?

And just a thought: Flash-night (eg, night actions are sent before the end of day, and night lasts for as long as it takes Tar to post the results)

And another: maybe there's no mafia at all? 0_o

Any post during any day. But I can only make one selection per day. I get my result at the end of the day. No mention of "night" anything.

Well, with that, I'm almost positive of my "flash-night" theory, and realize that the idea of lynching you is now just plain ridiculous >.<

[Wall-E]

@Battousai: "Condone" means "approve of."

[DragonsofSummer]

I think the word he was looking for was condemn... but that is irrellevant. I wasn't trying to say the action was scummy Batt, and I will state again, I truly believe that it is just AWKWARD timing.

Cyber I really am interested why you think speculation in general is scummy.

[MafiaSSK]

My orgin claim =Neon Genesis Evangelion.

[Battousai]

You may not say it is scummy, but I do. And yes, I meant condemn not condone.

[Wall-E]

In what universe is it scummy to condemn a wagon that goes to L-1 in six hours? I want to hear from both the accused and the rest of the town before we hammer Jebus. That's all I was saying.

[Natirasha]

We're lynching Jebus?

[Jebus]

It's only scummy if you protect an obvious scum. In this case, I don't think I'd fall under that category

Here's a theory, anyway. In every lynch where there are 2+ scum not being attacked, there will be at least one mafia member with a vote on the person being lynched.

Well you guys don't know for sure, I know I'm pro-town, so out of the five voting for me, one of them is scum. Theoretically, at least. This theory holds true 9/10 times, anyway. Of course, that idea of lynching DG was practically baiting it >.<

[Wall-E]

I'm not hammering or voting Jebus right now. I think we thought we already had lynched him and then it turns out we didn't. I think I'll read the thread again, if you'll pardon me... *page 1 click*

[Natirasha]

What's the case vs. Jebus anyways? DGB's useless ramblings?