Mini 653 - Family Guy Mafia - Game over

reborn537 · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:31 pm

I'll see what other people say, this could be interesting for information. Also if we get in a lynch soon we can have a nice long twilight to digest while Farside is away.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:29 pm

Sorry all, had no internet access in Vermont yesterday.
I can get on here in Massachusetts while I am at the hotel.

xtoxm, I've noticed that you have changed your vote a couple of times and it seems to have been lurker votes. Are you looking for a lurker lynch or are you trying to get more posts out of lurkers?

Reborn, I like your idea to nominate a few players for you but I don't think that it should be our major topic of discussion. We should be more concerned with scum hunting than who uses Stewie's inventions.

ISO · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:43 pm

KMD, who do you think is scum?

GhostWriter · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:10 pm

And why? Don't forget the "and why?" part. It's fairly crucial.

ISO · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:36 pm

I would be sad if he answered my question only with names.

GhostWriter · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:38 pm

It happens.

ISO · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:26 pm

You're right.

Xtoxm · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:06 am

xtoxm, I've noticed that you have changed your vote a couple of times and it seems to have been lurker votes. Are you looking for a lurker lynch or are you trying to get more posts out of lurkers?

Really? Coincidence.

I'm voting to try and get scum lynched.

Why

would

I have nameclaimed??

GhostWriter · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:54 am

When you claim "lover" in a themed game, and then say that your character isn't the one that would match your partner's lover nameclaim, it helps a bit to know what the heel your role's name could be.

Also, how would I make a good lynch?

reborn537 · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:14 am

Xtoxm, there is no reason for you not to nameclaim. If you don't nameclaim I will vote for you.

elvis_knits · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:46 am

reborn537 wrote:OK, I've checked the pm thoroughly and I was wrong. Ghostwriter is correct, it seems to be very much the traditional inventing role - although I don't know if people normally make up the names of their inventions when inventing, but that is the case with me.

It looks to me like you faked your inventor claim and then pretended you misread your PM when you realized your claim varied from the traditional inventor role and were worried we would not believe this variant of the role.

I guess it could happen that you really misread it, but, I know I always make sure I understand my role and reread my pm if I'm going to claim. Because it really destroys your credibility if you change your story later.

I am not a fan.

elvis_knits · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:49 am

reborn537 wrote:Xtoxm, there is no reason for you not to nameclaim. If you don't nameclaim I will vote for you.

I don't understand why you and GW want him to nameclaim.

reborn537 · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:29 am

elvis_knits wrote:
reborn537 wrote:OK, I've checked the pm thoroughly and I was wrong. Ghostwriter is correct, it seems to be very much the traditional inventing role - although I don't know if people normally make up the names of their inventions when inventing, but that is the case with me.
It looks to me like you faked your inventor claim and then pretended you misread your PM when you realized your claim varied from the traditional inventor role and were worried we would not believe this variant of the role.

I guess it could happen that you really misread it, but, I know I always make sure I understand my role and reread my pm if I'm going to claim. Because it really destroys your credibility if you change your story later.

I am not a fan.

No, you're right, it was stupid of me to midread the pm. These things happen. Luckily it's ok because it's a confirmable role.

reborn537 · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:30 am

elvis_knits wrote:
reborn537 wrote:Xtoxm, there is no reason for you not to nameclaim. If you don't nameclaim I will vote for you.
I don't understand why you and GW want him to nameclaim.

What are the reasons not to?

Let me explain. The only reason he would not want to is if he is scum WITHOUT safe claims.

This is pretty obvious really,

FoS EK

reborn537 · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:45 am

To clarify - he's already claimed. You'll notice that EVERYONE else who has claimed has given their name. Why hasn't he?

Xtoxm · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:57 am

Lol, go ahead and vote for me mate.

Xtoxm · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:58 am

And don't be stupid, ofcourse there are reasons for me to withhold it.

I have confirmed I am a lover with BG.

Scum would want to get their claim out early, town holds it for as long as possible.

reborn537 · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:10 am

WINE. IN. FRONT. OF. ME.

I believe you are the scum in a one scum, one town lover partnership.

unvote vote xtoxm

Xtoxm · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:16 am

I might be convinceable on a Reborn lynch after that display.

reborn537 · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:17 am

Hahahaa, OMGUS.

Xtoxm · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:23 am

Unvote Vote Reborn

Xtoxm · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:23 am

Did you just learn about these terms or something?

reborn537 · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:23 am

What's your case on me?

Xtoxm · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:25 am

I might think one up later, if someone I remotely care about telling asks.

RestFermata · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:25 am

Why did both BG and Rockatansky spell Bonnie's name wrong?