elvis_knits wrote:I believe I have seen kloud browsing this forum multiple times today and not posting (and I don't think he's in another game in coney island).
Yeah, sorry everyone, as I have been repeatedly saying I am extremely busy IRL and have very limited access on weekdays. Unfortunately, that meant that I have been rushing to try to get to games and, in the process, have missed others. I am trying to get my schedule worked out so I can get back into all my games, and I think I am almost there.
And, EK, just for the record I am currently in two other games in Coney Island.
I am going to address what I feel I need to address now. I know this will be out of chronological order (in regards to EK's post/my response and the rest of the posts I am about to respond to.)
First off:
LlamaFluff in 715 wrote:reborn537 wrote:Kmd4390 wrote:Reborn, why are you avoiding llama's question.
I think I believe EK's claim but I don't like the suggestion that all vanilla are chris. It opens up a fake claim for scum to just say "you can't counterclaim, there are more than one of this character."
I'm not avoiding it, I've been very clear that I don't know EK's alignment.
Thats avoiding it. I have been saying "I think EK is town". You have been saying "I cant see the future". There is a distinct difference there, while I am committing to a stance, you keep avoiding commenting on what you percieve EKs alignment to be. "I hope he is scum", "I dont know", "Im not scum, how should I know" are not answers that work for this question.
reborn537 in post 716 wrote:LlamaFluff wrote:I am at the point where the only feaseable options I see are no lynch or a lurker lynch. I think no lynch is the best option though given that just about all of the popular suspects have been forced to claim.
I think EK is town, I think reborn is town. IG is probally town with a few nagging suspicions after his last post. I think one of the lovers is scum, but no one seems willing to go for that today. That leaves a lot of people I have been leaning pro-town or at worse 45/55 scum on, of which I really dont think any make for a great lynching candidate.
I don't like Xtoxm's recent behaviour. I'm convinced that one of the lovers is scum, as both of them have been extremely scummy.
A lurker lynch is also fine with me, as I think this is a game that really requires participation. The people who have contributed less have really gotten away with murder. But who is that? BG is being replaced, STD is VLA, so I don't advocate either of these as a lurker lynch (although if we lynch the lovers obviously we'll have to discuss it carefully first). Noone really stands out as lurking.
Okay, in post 715 LF gives you an example or paraphrasing of what he means by you dodging the question of whether or not you feel EK is scum or not. The immediately succeeding post, your post 716, does not even address what LF just commented on, which makes me begin to feel that you are/were indeed purposefully avoiding to comment on the topic for the time being.
reborn537 wrote:There are certain things that we probably disagree over, which is why I'm not going to talk any further on the EK thing.
I see this as an attempt to simply bury the conversation, even after to have not responded the initial question.
reborn537 wrote:I'm pretty convinced I have pushed it. I think EK is the right play because she is extremely scummy, giving us a good chance of lynching scum, and if she was telling the truth, then we only lose a vanilla townie. The chance of lynching scum outweighs the risk of losing a vanilla townie and this is why an EK lynch is preferable to a no lynch. The lynch of an unconfirmed is always preferable to a no lynch. To you guys, I should be a better lynch than a no lynch, and I think you need to realise that.
Okay, so you answer the question. Why not just do this when first asked, for I feel that this would have helped to steer clear of frustration and confusion, both for you and to those that were asking you about your suspicions.
elvis_knits wrote:How did you go from asking people their reasons for voting me because you saw no case on me, to thinking I am extremely scummy?
reborn537 wrote: I knew that several people thought you were scum, although they refused to tell me why. Considering the fact that more people think you are scum than there are likely to be scum in the game, a couple of them at least are genuine townies with genuine reasons on you. That's why I moved my vote to you.
reborn wrote:I think EK is the right play because she is extremely scummy
Lastly, EK poses this question to you. I find it interesting that this is a dramatic difference in tone/thought, and the two ideas are only several posts (of yours) away from each other (if I am not mistaken). I also find it interesting that you have yet to comment on it.
I haven't really had strong scum vibes on you thus far. I cannot say exactly why this was so, so I should probably look back and see, but even with the content I quoted above I am leaning towards you being town for now.
EGMEOY
though.
I still have my suspicions of BG for the same reasons as earlier, so I would not be opposed to lynching her. This being said, my suspicions of xtoxm have waned considerably since the earlier pages of the thread, and I feel that he may helpful when scumhunting later on down the road. I am not really understanding the TT lynch proposition, so could someone explain it to me please?
