It's actually not.In post 2272, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:there's other stuff too that gamma mentioned - like the way you latched on to the anti-Gamma case which mostly centered on his shift in relation with you - despite knowing that the shift was due to your overnight convo in the neighborhood.
That part is super shady af.
I think I am not using an excuse to vote you. While I thought you might be partners with Noraa I’ve felt your play throughout the game has been suspicious at multiple times, and after I wrote all of it out while outing the hood I pretty much realized “this is actually a lot of evidence I’m looking at”.In post 2271, Blitzo wrote:Gamma I actually don't think you really have much of an excuse to be voting me anymore so if you could just not sweep that under the rug again that'd be awesome.
yea I did.
In post 1732, UneducatedGuesser wrote:And now… after spending twilight being real mad at Blitzo, and having Blitzo being real questioning of him…. We’re right back to Panzer with nary a comment on that topic, or on the topic of the Pooky case that looked good all of a sudden when it was only noticed too late to make a difference to MC’s day one fate? And Blitzo is right there following him on it, which seems weird, but Blitzo and Panzer have been shitty with each other for the entire game and it fits in with my earlier assessment of Blitzo's method of target accquisition so far, which may not actually be AI.
*Again, I stand by the way that you and I handled the neighborhood is completely different and I fail to see how that's AI. The hood isIn post 2276, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think I am not using an excuse to vote you. While I thought you might be partners with Noraa I’ve felt your play throughout the game has been suspicious at multiple times, and after I wrote all of it out while outing the hood I pretty much realized “this is actually a lot of evidence I’m looking at”.In post 2271, Blitzo wrote:Gamma I actually don't think you really have much of an excuse to be voting me anymore so if you could just not sweep that under the rug again that'd be awesome.
I thought your entry into the game was suspect, I’ve had to fight tooth and nail to get you to post content in the hood several times, including him going pretty damn quiet after I posted the Noraa meta wall (his posts past then were just apologizing for being away, prodding me to deal with the UG case again, and discussing town power level, as well as one empty reaction post close after I outed the hood, which I find interesting given his previous slow-feeling response times). There was definitely content to discuss, such as what I told you about my feelings on the NK after I wasn’t limited by ongoing game rules, but your content at that point was very surface-level.
There’s also the part where you had written me off as town apparently, back towards early-mid D1. If you’d truly thought I was Town because we were neighbors, why was there no greater attempt from you to try and make use of the hood early on? If you thought I was guaranteed Town the hood was a masonry in all but name, no? Despite that I absolutely was driving the early talk.
And then obviously there’s the things I’ve already talked on regarding your handling of the UG case on me and your inability to grasp my mason gambit idea, which I feel like I’ve been pretty clear on by now, but you seem to be claiming I’m not. That’s actually a common thread I noticed after checking the hood contents in full again, because you also accused Shea of dodging your questions when he wasn’t. In addition I had a point where I felt it ironic you’d called Shea on that but also got semantic with Noraa over whether you were avoiding solving her, maybe that was an actual scumtell I failed to grasp at the time?
I don't have time now to look but I'd be happy to lim any of them as well as noraa obvIn post 2277, Kasumeat wrote:Phone posting on the road but lol people jumping off of Noraa's wagon because of that claim. She literally goes from claiming that she will have "very close to confscum" if she lives one night to claiming a role that is one of the weakest investigative roles in the role game which is literally incapable of discerning alignment without a fair bit of very particular information.
She is just straight up lying, claiming that she has a useful role in one breath and then claiming it's useless in another.
Those jumping off her wagon are even scummier though. It's theoretically possible that she's just a village idiot and the scum don't want to push a mislim too hard, but it's literally not possible for anyone to actually believe that claim.
the whole point of his Gamma case was that his progression doesn't make sense.In post 2280, Blitzo wrote:@pooky - there were two goddamn lines about the neighborhood. WHAT ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE?
Except it makes perfect sense when you consider her role was practically worthless and she was trying to NK bait. Scum would have tried to scare town away from voting out a potentially useful PR, but she claimed something super-meager. Plus the fact she claims to have been trying to soft tracker makes sense as a town!Noraa move and also lines up with how she was claiming to be able to get confscum despite not getting a result on Shea that meant much (the idea would have been that she was trying to indicate a no action result on Shea, which does lean a person town without making them really unwanted as a vote).In post 2277, Kasumeat wrote:Phone posting on the road but lol people jumping off of Noraa's wagon because of that claim. She literally goes from claiming that she will have "very close to confscum" if she lives one night to claiming a role that is one of the weakest investigative roles in the role game which is literally incapable of discerning alignment without a fair bit of very particular information.
She is just straight up lying, claiming that she has a useful role in one breath and then claiming it's useless in another.
Those jumping off her wagon are even scummier though. It's theoretically possible that she's just a village idiot and the scum don't want to push a mislim too hard, but it's literally not possible for anyone to actually believe that claim.
The stuff we talked about in the neighborhood was beforehand, not after - there were plenty of other things that UG talked about that had nothing to do with the hood in yet those are constantly being overlooked. I actually only harped on one point (re: his read change on pooky) but UG posted a slew of other things and Gamma just went "yeah I'll be wary of him" and then tried to get us to claim masons.PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:the whole point of his Gamma case was that his progression doesn't make sense.In post 2280, Blitzo wrote:@pooky - there were two goddamn lines about the neighborhood. WHAT ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE?
but you being in a neighborhood with him and talking it out with him - makes that progression make sense.
Do you not understand!?
I never really had the option to make a decision - Gamma just kind of decided to reveal the neighborhood. I was pressing him on the plan because I didn't understand it so well and didn't know how to read reactions off of it but it amounted to nothing anyway.In post 2287, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:why wouldn't you want to claim masons? it's a pretty good way to draw mafia NK if you are T-T and if you don't draw NK you have an idea it's not T-T.
