yeah this is a good point.In post 3815, Alisae wrote:bh I don't think this clears Lavender when Lavender was being told that they'll be locktown if they vote there. Sure Lavender can wait around for like 2 hours but its too risky. If town shows up and votes Taylor then they're screwed and anything can happen within 2 hours.
that loss of your confidence is your heart telling you that you're making the wrong decision, but that's OK - you still have time to save yourself.In post 3823, Hectic wrote:If you doubt me, check the playerlist here:
viewtopic.php?f=83&t=84250
Pedit: I lost so much confidence by just seeing this post, you have no idea
the only counter point I can logically think of is that the vote was placed at like 6am pst so maybe it would be possible to just wait 2 more hours since its fairly earlyIn post 3825, Nachomamma8 wrote:yeah this is a good point.In post 3815, Alisae wrote:bh I don't think this clears Lavender when Lavender was being told that they'll be locktown if they vote there. Sure Lavender can wait around for like 2 hours but its too risky. If town shows up and votes Taylor then they're screwed and anything can happen within 2 hours.
lav confidence removed.
I mean they would have gotten no blame but its not like their slot improves.In post 3831, Hectic wrote:Lavender basically never posts at that time, Prism did the research. It was perfectly valid for her to not vote there and recieve no blame the next day if someone saved the situation. it was a very unusual posting time for her, across her site post history apparently
Why'd you go offline without voting after this post, Krazy?In post 2950, Krazy wrote:shhh you ruined it
Regarding 3830In post 3836, Hectic wrote:Good point.
Why'd you go offline without voting after this post, Krazy?In post 2950, Krazy wrote:shhh you ruined it
I think bad logic = scum, because if scum!Pooky provided good logic, it'll convince others to vote Ele. Pooky doesn't want to bus, he wants to distance. So he uses moonlogicky stuff like he did there, in order to get the towncred for it, while not actually convincing anyone of it at the time.In post 3809, Nachomamma8 wrote:I agree with your criticism that the point is not great. But I don't understand how "attacking someone with poor logic" leads you to "scum distancing". Why would Pooky want to distance with Elements at that point? It's usually not hard to find reasons to attack a scum partner (since you know they are scum already), but usually bad distancing happens when people force it - why would Pooky, a very crafty teddy bear, force it?In post 3121, Hectic wrote:This is the first scum-indicative thing I saw. At the time, I found the reasoning here very strange, I think I mentioned it then at some point as well, but basically, it smells of scum!Pooky distancing with Ele, but the reasoning he's provided is just not believable. It's very unrealistic and surface level to assume that scum!Ele is trying to "sneak" himself into the middle of some SPARES because he's Chara trying to ascend. Pooky also for whatever reason is implying puttimg himself in the middle somehow makes it more sneaky, like Ele has put forth a plan of days 1 to 3 SPARES. The read just makes no sense, and it's because scum!Pooky is using it as an excuse to distance some with his partner.
Elements did basically put forward a spare plan for the next three days. I understand Pooky's point about him putting himself in the middle but not at the end (so he looks like he's willing to spare someone else, but he's also not putting himself as the last person to be spared. I understand your criticism here, again, but disagree that bad logic = scum.
Where do you want to FIGHT today?In post 3841, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I literally do not do this as scum
I was going to re-read and figure this out last night but Isis made me download Undertale because she's very tricky and knew I would be unable to get past even the easiest levels.In post 3843, Hectic wrote:Where do you want to FIGHT today?In post 3841, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I literally do not do this as scum
