*
Not Voting (3) - armlx, wolframnhart, DarlaBlueEyes
I don't see much wrong in discussing options for tommorow in our spare time, it's not like the mafia has any night choices this helps them with.ThAdmiral wrote:There's a fine line between discussing options and setting up lynches. I don't really think there's any danger of an actual chain-lynch being set up, but it's better to make sure of that by mentioning the possibility, methinks.neko2086 wrote:ThAdmiral, is there anything wrong with discussing possible lynch candidates for tomorrow when there is obviously not going to be any alternative to the ice/op lynch today? I see discussion happening, not necessarily the setting up of lynches.
Pff, when a wagon gets past 10 votes, it's almost certainty that that person will be lynched eventually. I don't believe the case on you has been blown apart. Even if it has, the case on FirestartericemanE wrote:Why hasn't the wagon moved back to Crazy yet? Everyone should ask themselves this question. Ridiculous, if you ask me. Even after I blew Adel's case apart, I'm still up for lynch. What will it take to get you to realize how flawed it is? Only thing left to do is wait to die, I guess. Lol. Freakin' good game while it lasted.
The case on Fire is pretty weak once you know he's my lover - he was defending me, albeit in a horrible fashion.the case on Firestarter hasn't been blown apart.
I agree, but clearly no-one else does. In fact it was funny to watch the votes pile up on youicemanE wrote:The case on Fire is pretty weak once you know he's my lover - he was defending me, albeit in a horrible fashion.
What does a town in northern Italy have to do with Adel?icemanE wrote:let me tell you that Adel's case WAS bologna.
Nightless.Adel wrote:just so everyone is clear, apparently we don't have to worry about non-lynches in this game.destructor wrote: 7. At deadline, the player with the most votes will be lynched. In the event of a draw, the player who reached the most votes first will be lynched.
Iceman, I don't want to die!Cephrir wrote:It does kinda look like setting up two consecutive mislynches.It's not as much of a scumtell in a Multiball gameActually, I think it's just about as bad. What we have here isn't a scummy example of it in my opinion, there's no reason not to at least discuss tomorrow since we basically know the game state will be, except of course that we don't know Ice/OP's alignment yet.
If you're town, the best thing you could do now is post some of those suspicions. I know you're suspicious of me, and slightly of charter. Anyone else?OP wrote:Let me just say that there's a lot of scummy people out there. Assuming I am gonna be deadlined lynch, please start looking at those. Yes, still look at Crazy. Look at the suspicious actions in this thread. Don't follow "bologna" cases.
look again.somestrangeflea wrote:Waiting for deadline.
Not happy with the "L-1 is badbadbad" crowd, especially people who are complaining about the -1 whilst still voting for Ice. Namely... uhm... Adel.
Here is a Votecount showing Adel voting IcemanE.Adel wrote:look again.somestrangeflea wrote:Waiting for deadline.
Not happy with the "L-1 is badbadbad" crowd, especially people who are complaining about the -1 whilst still voting for Ice. Namely... uhm... Adel.
ITP we learn Crazy is fairly unexperienced in mafia.Crazy wrote:I find Adel's switch of votes incredibly strange. But you must agree that it's only scummy if Iceman turns up as scum, correct? If Iceman shows up as town, then there was no scum-motivation for Adel to switch her vote at the last second.
So that when the townie from the first wagon is lynched she looks like town.Crazy wrote:I am male.
Please explain why Adel-scum would switch her vote from one townie to another right at the end of the day.
Yeah, building a case on someone and abandon it at the last second sure makes her look like town, right?Alabaska J wrote:So that when the townie from the first wagon is lynched she looks like town.Crazy wrote:I am male.
Please explain why Adel-scum would switch her vote from one townie to another right at the end of the day.
While my case against icemanE was sincere, I became more and more alarmed as other people joined his wagon in a manner that would not leave them accountable in the event of a mislynch. DBE lurking and then finially placing a lynch-1 vote without warning was the last straw. I firmly believe that more strong wagon yield more information, giving the town more of a chance to win in the long run. icemanE's wagon coasting along without additional input from the people joining the wagon is a bad sign.somestrangeflea wrote:Here is a Votecount showing Adel voting IcemanE.Adel wrote:look again.somestrangeflea wrote:Waiting for deadline.
Not happy with the "L-1 is badbadbad" crowd, especially people who are complaining about the -1 whilst still voting for Ice. Namely... uhm... Adel.
Here is Adel's reasonless Vote for DarlaBlueEyes, which was quickly followed by a reason.
My quoted post had more present tense than it should have. I meant to say that I wasn't happy with people who were attacking DBE's -1 even though they themselves were voting Iceman when DBE voted. I believe the classic "All votes are equally dangerous" argument applies here.
Or, what AJ said.
Adel wrote:I'm calling the Firestarter + IcemanE scum team.
Glory onto me when I'm proven correct.