You may think it odd, but is it even possibly a scummy action.BM wrote: My point was not that Muerrto shouldnt analyse Armlx, but that Armlx encouraging him to do so seemed odd.
Korts wins the prize of knowing what I'm talking about.Korts wrote: I took armlx to be waiting for a general analysis on the game, a kind of finger-pointing post.
That's not exactly what i meant. Firstly, i was under the impression that Muerrto had given more reasoning against Armlx than mere WIFOM. Secondly, I wasnt aware that Armlx was not already voting for Muerrto.strife220 wrote:I don't get BM's point at all. Armix said he wanted to wait for Muerrto's analysis before considering the hammer. I would have considered it scummy for him to hammer without letting Muerrto have a final say, regardless of what Muerrto flipped.
You are voting for him, and seem content enough with his lynch today. Why then would you want his comments UNLESS you thought he was town?armlx wrote:As for the assumption of Muerrto = town, I did not assume anything of the sort. I left the door open in case it is true, that is all.
The assumption of Muerrto being town was inferred by you, and your intrigue into his suspicions. The assertion of you being town was a scenario used to portray why i felt your comment was far from in the interest of the town.
Furthermore, i don't believe i ever said that self-preservation is more important than finding scum. But then, given Muerrto has already outlined his suspicions quite succinctly, the only real impact i can see of him providing more analysis would be to the end of proving you are scum. Which, unless you consider YOURSELF to be scum, cannot be considered encouraging scumhunting.
Actually, i'd beg to differ. Because you are setting yourself up as the target at the end of a day, where the lynch is all but decided, you are opening yourself up for attack, and tunnel-vision is MORE likely. Admirable if you are town, perhaps. But its not what i'd expect others to do, nor what i would do myself.Armlx wrote:If my actions were legitimately scummy enough to warrant a case, they would be noticed later. What does it matter if the case is now or later? Its probably even better if the case is made now, as any refutations and responses I make now are less likely to be lost in a flood of other behavior, and tunnel vision is less likely to happen.Armlx, however, seems to be doing the exact opposite-by encouraging a case on himself, he is not only NOT SCUMHUNTING but he is also setting HIMSELF up as a lynch candidate.
I rescind all previous assertions. That's what i get for skimming i guess. But that's the easiest case in the world to pin on someone like you. Not buying it in the least.Armlx wrote:If he had posted one, I would, but his only attack so far is "You are too good to be voting me right now".if Armlx was going to refute said case against him from Muerrto, he would already have done so.
As i pointed out earlier, blindly encouraging participation is certainly scummy.armlx wrote:You may think it odd, but is it even possibly a scummy action.BM wrote: My point was not that Muerrto shouldnt analyse Armlx, but that Armlx encouraging him to do so seemed odd.
Jordan got back today, so i figure he probably wants to hop back in asap. Thanks for having me, and i'm sure i'll see you all aroundforbiddanlight wrote:So, anyway, how are you doing on your reread, BM? You seemed to have gotten sidetracked by discussing armix's motives.
THERE WERE STILL QUESTIONS DAMMIT! NOOO!To hell with everything. I know myself well enough to be able to foresee days of procrastination over the analysis, so I'll just hammer.
unvote, vote: Muerrto
) Don't play dumb, fl, Muerrto's had more than one chance to address what he wanted to address. Anyway, my count says I've only put him to L-1.forbiddanlight wrote:THERE WERE STILL QUESTIONS DAMMIT! NOOO!To hell with everything. I know myself well enough to be able to foresee days of procrastination over the analysis, so I'll just hammer.
unvote, vote: Muerrto
(oh wait...maybe there weren't)
Actually, thinking on it, there really were, ya coulda at least waited for his response to armix.
(YAY META HYPOCRISY! I'm sure you enjoy it SC
Actually, it's a joke because of something that happened in another game I'm in. I really shouldn't have said anything, but it still works. To be fair, I actually think you might be right...I'll see if there is a muerrto post between.Korts wrote:Don't play dumb, fl, Muerrto's had more than one chance to address what he wanted to address. Anyway, my count says I've only put him to L-1.forbiddanlight wrote:THERE WERE STILL QUESTIONS DAMMIT! NOOO!To hell with everything. I know myself well enough to be able to foresee days of procrastination over the analysis, so I'll just hammer.
unvote, vote: Muerrto
(oh wait...maybe there weren't)
Actually, thinking on it, there really were, ya coulda at least waited for his response to armix.
(YAY META HYPOCRISY! I'm sure you enjoy it SC
