viewtopic.php?f=52&t=76766In post 945, Almost50 wrote:Can you link me to that game? I tried to find it in my own threads but could only find one where I was a VT (and replaced out !!!)
Oops I seem to have confused you with some kind of secret agent
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=76766In post 945, Almost50 wrote:Can you link me to that game? I tried to find it in my own threads but could only find one where I was a VT (and replaced out !!!)
hey it worked fine for me in anuket topazIn post 948, Almost50 wrote:@tw: I am never getting mad at you for SRing me in ANY game. You can keep on doing this in the next million games we meet in and then see how many of them you've been spot on.
Yes it did, and now I need to make it NAI, hence my declaration.In post 951, the worst wrote:hey it worked fine for me in anuket topazIn post 948, Almost50 wrote:@tw: I am never getting mad at you for SRing me in ANY game. You can keep on doing this in the next million games we meet in and then see how many of them you've been spot on.
i think i'm in agreement with this.In post 930, iamausername wrote:even if we don't execute A50 today, i don't think we should try to direct his shot. if he's scum, he can easily ignore the direction if it doesn't suit them, and if he's town, it's better that scum don't know whether they should interfere with his shot or not.
In post 944, the worst wrote:anyone else smell the magnificent cologne of desperation?
Like, I wouldn’t call it desperation, but 942 does seem like purposeful attempt to Be Present and Productive after A50 did a whole “I’m not going to do a lot of effort” intro.In post 942, Almost50 wrote:I totally forgot how this setup worked, but now I remember. Nobody tell me what to do. Not whom to shoot and certainly not WHEN to do it. It's not just the redirector (who -btw- could interfere even if I was directed to shoot town, just to make it appear like I didn't follow the direction thus shading both myself and the original target). On top of the redirector there's the possibility of a 1-shot Commuter, a Roleblocker, a Scum Doctor or a JK, all of which can interfere with my shot.
So, let's keep it at this: I may or may not shoot tonight, and if I do it's someone of my own choice. That way if a redirector exists and wants to be on me the other TPR are guaranteed their results to -at least- be on their intended targets. If Scum want to block me then other TPRs will have their actions going through... etc, and there's no guarantee that I;m even going to shoot at all, so their redirection/RB'ing is a waste (especially the redirection which is 1-shot)
we can do that tomorrow if need be.In post 958, Green Crayons wrote:Or just elim A50
and his effort is geared like, quite specifically towards survival.In post 959, Green Crayons wrote:In post 944, the worst wrote:anyone else smell the magnificent cologne of desperation?Like, I wouldn’t call it desperation, but 942 does seem like purposeful attempt to Be Present and Productive after A50 did a whole “I’m not going to do a lot of effort” intro.In post 942, Almost50 wrote:I totally forgot how this setup worked, but now I remember. Nobody tell me what to do. Not whom to shoot and certainly not WHEN to do it. It's not just the redirector (who -btw- could interfere even if I was directed to shoot town, just to make it appear like I didn't follow the direction thus shading both myself and the original target). On top of the redirector there's the possibility of a 1-shot Commuter, a Roleblocker, a Scum Doctor or a JK, all of which can interfere with my shot.
So, let's keep it at this: I may or may not shoot tonight, and if I do it's someone of my own choice. That way if a redirector exists and wants to be on me the other TPR are guaranteed their results to -at least- be on their intended targets. If Scum want to block me then other TPRs will have their actions going through... etc, and there's no guarantee that I;m even going to shoot at all, so their redirection/RB'ing is a waste (especially the redirection which is 1-shot)
This sounds like you're saying you don't want to execute A50 today, but you're still voting him.In post 960, Hoopla wrote:we can do that tomorrow if need be.In post 958, Green Crayons wrote:Or just elim A50
there's a chance we learn more about his slot via N1's results, so we may not need to guess on his slot today.
and we're not burning a mis-execution by taking the chance.
Yes. That's probably the most distinguishing feature of my playIn post 964, DrDolittle wrote:SS remind me does it usually take this long for you to drop a vote
i don't think it was that shady actuallyIn post 898, Something_Smart wrote:Hi A50! Somehow your predecessor's wagon cooled down significantly after a hella shady replace-out, but I think (and I doubt I'm alone in this) that you should claim anyway.
i kinda think they did?In post 969, the worst wrote:marquis didn't drop out under pressure tho