Mini 637: Xyl's Smalltown Plus - Game Over

Xylthixlm · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:24 pm

Vote Count

ZombieSlayer54 -

4

(armlx, pwnz, Geddingsworth, hasdgfas)
wolframnhart -

3

(Empking, charter, ZombieSlayer54)

Not voting: wolframnhart

With 8 alive, it will take 5 to lynch. The deadline for day 1 is Saturday, August 16 at 7:00 PM Pacific.

7 days to deadline. If deadline hit now, ZombieSlayer54 would be lynched.

armlx · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 6:01 pm

Well, then, in the case that we can get such a weird randomization, who is to say such a weird thing as an infectious post restriction is not possible?

Because this PR you are suggesting is so subjective its beyond a reasonable thought.

Empking · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Sat Aug 09, 2008 9:37 pm

Geddingsworth: Hasn't posted much but his posts have been pro-town.
Charter: Everything he has done seems to be pro-town.

ZombieSlayer54 · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:36 am

armlx wrote:
Well, then, in the case that we can get such a weird randomization, who is to say such a weird thing as an infectious post restriction is not possible?
Because this PR you are suggesting is so subjective its beyond a reasonable thought.

Yes, and Empking and Pwnz have been displaying reasonable thought...

charter · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:43 am

Alright, ZS you just won't drop your ridiculous ideas. Don't think we need to waste more time discussing them.

unvote, vote ZS

ZombieSlayer54 · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:00 am

Ok, well, since I am lynched, I may as well tell you what my lynch will tell you.

I am a cop.

Simple as that, really.

Geddingsworth · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:03 am

Even if you're town, lynching a guy because he's being too townie is still the worst plan I've ever heard.

armlx · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:41 am

Geddingsworth wrote:Even if you're town, lynching a guy because he's being too townie is still the worst plan I've ever heard.

Apparently you weren't in World Domination Mafia 2 on MTGS, where far worse plans were carried out.

Geddingsworth · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:09 am

Nope! Before my time, I'm afraid.

armlx · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:00 am

Geddingsworth wrote:Nope! Before my time, I'm afraid.

To summarize

1. Someone was lynched b/c when they quoted their PM to claim there was a grammar mistake. Turns out the PM was typed by a small child.

2. Someone with potentially unlimited votes was somehow presumed scum by a third of the town. The other player with potential unlimited votes then outed themself to hammer him from like L-5 and was killed that night.

Geddingsworth · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:49 am

Haha, yeah, I have heard those stories before. Good times on MTGS.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:09 pm

Day 1 Final Vote Count

ZombieSlayer54 -

5

(armlx, pwnz, Geddingsworth, hasdgfas, charter)
wolframnhart -

2

(Empking, ZombieSlayer54)

Not voting: wolframnhart

ZombieSlayer54

is lynched. He was a

Night Watchman/Cop

.

Empking

dies of poison. He was an

Inventor

.

You have 72 hours to submit night actions. The deadline for Day 2 will be Saturday, August 30 at 9:00 PM pacific.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:53 pm

Day 2 dawns. You discover that

Geddingsworth

died overnight. He was a

Human Shield

.

With 5 alive, it will take 3 to lynch. The deadline for today is Saturday, August 30 at 9:00 PM pacific.

armlx · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:00 pm

Thoughts on how we should reveal night targets? I vote random ordering given the set up of hidden alignments meaning the info results are under just as much scrutiny as the others.

NO ONE should reveal info till we decide on this.

charter · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:05 am

Random works for me.

wolframnhart · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:26 am

Random is fine by me

hasdgfas · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:38 am

Why is random better than popcorn?

charter · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:55 am

Popcorn is fine with me too. Any method is fine.

armlx · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:53 am

Why is random better than popcorn?

I'm fine with popcorn so long as we agree that we should base our choices mostly on the person's behavior. I just don't like a method where the order of claims is at all based on what the person's ability is, as in this scenario it becomes too easy to manipulate a lynch.

pwnz · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 6:11 am

I had no idea that this sort of thing was so detrimental to the outcome of the game.. I dont care how we revel results.

charter · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:16 am

Well, I'll just go first, I bussed wolf and geddings.

Next up, armlx.

armlx · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:24 am

Ged did not have a gun.

Hascows next.

hasdgfas · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:28 am

Blocked charter.

gogo pwnz

wolframnhart · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:36 am

sorry to interupt on the popcorning but:
a)how long should we wait on his answer
b) should we even use my ability today? only reason i ask that is if we use it, and are wrong in both that and our lynch, wouldn't that be gg if there were 3 scum?

armlx · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Wed Aug 13, 2008 6:47 pm

A) We have practically infinite time to wait on him. I'm willing to wait for him to post until a replacement occurs and they post. If he posts without claiming though, his time runs out.
B) Wolf, a no use is probably optimal today.