ZombieSlayer54 -
wolframnhart -
Not voting: hasdgfas, wolframnhart
With 8 alive, it will take 5 to lynch. The deadline for day 1 is Saturday, August 16 at 7:00 PM Pacific.
I'm saying that is a dumb and irrelevant point to bring up. How do you make a PR of being unhelpful even? This honestly looks like a desperate attempt to deflect attention off yourself.Armlx, are you really saying there appears to be no similarities between Pwnz's new posting and the way Empking has been posting all game long?
Empking wrote:This post leads me to think that he's purpousely mislead the town in order to stay alive and since we're not at lynch or loose it seems to me to be a scum like move.wolframnhart wrote:So you would vote me, out of the other dayvigs? Kinda random there since there are worse potential killers.Empking wrote:Vote: wolframnhart
I really don't like the idea of a dayvig who might be scum.
On the other hand, I do quite like the "kill a lot on day 1" plan though six deaths on day 1 would be a bit too much, four seems a bit much.
I think the "kill a good role so I can take it" was more of a moment of idiocy rather than a scum tell but I'm not sure if it was a town moment or scum moment.
Apparently my joke was only funny to me. No, I don't have any stupid posting restrictions, I was merely trying to express the utter disgust I felt when Empking *of all people* is telling me that I make groundless claims. So, I decided to prove him right because he is obviously all-knowing. HEY GUYS! HAVE YOU READ ABOUT WOLFRAMNHART? "JUST READ HIS POSTS IF YOU WANT TO SEE WHAT I MEAN! IN THE HOPE THAT WRITING IT IN CAPITALS ALLOWS YOU TO READ IT. HE TRIES TO MISLEAD THE TOWN, HE TRIES TO LOOK TOWNIE WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING TOWNIE, HE DOESN'T TRY TO SCUM HUNT."Empking wrote:Pwnz: Makes groundless claims, doesn't contribute. Scummy
FixedZombieSlayer54 wrote:And, armlx, my point was not dumb and irrelevant because, from my point of view, I think that Empking probably just has some kind of post restriction, rather than actually just beinga douchecompletely oblivious to everything.
Holy shit! I think ZS caught the Empking posting restriction virus, too!ZombieSlayer54 wrote:And pwnz, would you please kindly read the latest Wolframnhart posts? If he was not looking scummy before, he certainly is now.
But you never answered my Why question. Then on our current page 25, you posted:wolframnhart wrote:Ok you vote him, but any reason why?pwnz wrote:unvote
vote ZombieSlayer54
You voted for him without explaining why, then you seem eager to kill him off. Please explain why.pwnz wrote:Lets kill ZS.Geddingsworth wrote:Great explanation, but would you mind commenting on the situation at hand?
Seriously, do it.armlx wrote:Emp, please do this.pwnz wrote:Now that it should be obvious, you might as well spill your guts and let us all know what you think of the game from an objective standpoint. Seriously, no pressure, I'm sure I'll know what you're allignment really was by the end of the day anyhow.
What actions, exactly?armlx wrote:It was scummy. Your actions are scummier.Yeah, because when you jump on a bandwagon that is picking up speed, then jump off as soon as you start getting under pressure for it, that is NOT scummy at all.