I have to go now.In post 1074, AGar wrote:This seems particularly obtuse.In post 1057, Porkens wrote:You lied to auro that you scumread VPB? So all that VPB wagon was a lie?
I agreed with your statement and I know it's about that very case. I was reading and catching up at the time.In post 1018, Auro wrote:Please walk me through why it's lame and sucky to attack disingenuous assertions about meta. Moreso after you +1'd my saying ignorance and dishonesty were distinguishable, which was a statement about that very case.
I was responding to what I missed when I wasn't around. Plenty of people talked around, about, and for me and it was important for me to say what I needed to say. I'm all done with it now.In post 1032, Blair wrote:Starbuck still bothers me because I feel like she's peppered little barbs into her catch-up posts to try to reignite the 1v1 she claims was so terrible.
You wanna end the day then put auro back at L-1 and sit back for his claimIn post 1082, iamausername wrote:still here, still prefer VPB but it's not like i'm super sold on Auro as town (or on VPB as scum for that matter) and i mostly just want this day to be over with.
1) Okay, his switch to farside coincides with you inquiring why he's voting for you. Ah, so he dodged having to explain himself jumping on the highest bandwagon. I can see the logic here for sure-- although I also feel farside's read on him is unfair. Did that warrant him OMGUSing her? Perhaps not, it's certainly an easyish thing to attack if he's scum. I can also find it believable that he feels like farside is being disingenuous thoughVP Baltar wrote:1) his dump of the vote off me after I called him out as bandwagoning me to avoid the troubles he was facing. I first started calling this out in my post 485
2) He votes farside on like page 17 and does little if anything to encourage people to lynch her. I mean, lord knows I've been playing defense for like 20 pages here and have not been able to do as much active scum hunting -- but I don't think that's the case with Auro. He just kind of sat on that vote and joked and theorized to infinity.
3) THE THEORIZING TO INFINITY, OH MY CHRIST. I know MT says this is how he is, and I don't know him, so that's probably true. But honestly, i think scum has benefited this game from the jumped up page count. I do think there must be a scum among the most active players encouraging that. Auro's fluff to content ratio makes him a good suspect in this regard. I called this out in post 825 Even when he's trying to make "scum/town hunting posts" it looks like generic fluff.
4) The wagon on me has felt like a combination of apathy and a refusal of people to vote Auro. That has obviously shifted. I was starting to get weird concerns in the last day or so because as I started reflecting on why I was getting wagoned, it sort of occurred to me ABR would frequently say "VP or auro" but would then slightly nudge in my direction each time (percentages, etc). Looking at ABR's ISO, I saw lots of more direct calls to vote me and direct criticisms, and not nearly as much on Auro. However, ABR's unexpected switch and refusal to put me at L-1 when he had the chance basically means I was worrying about nothing. So I need to reassess who had a lack of interest in Auro's wagon but has jumped or been on mine with no prob (thinking mainly IAAU and MT here off hand, but I need a closer look at them.)
Not the same.In post 1085, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're not tired of mislynching me yet Blair?
In GeorgeBailey's game, after FL quickhammered, you could have sheeped me to lynch FL-scum. You chose instead to mislynch me. My play there and here is the same.
That's the same thing Auro said. You won't find me lining up lynches in my iso so your accusations are baseless. I think Auro flips scum and this is a last-ditch attempt to save him.In post 1088, Porkens wrote:Also you can come back to that tomorrow after auro is dead and say “ aw shucks I guess we should have lynched VP after all”
How ironic. I'm trying to get Auro to claim right now and you are the one derailing.In post 1087, Porkens wrote:How is it pro town to not get a claim from someone you scumread when you have the chance?
You are calling me scum?In post 1091, Albert B. Rampage wrote:That's the same thing Auro said. You won't find me lining up lynches in my iso so your accusations are baseless. I think Auro flips scum and this is a last-ditch attempt to save him.In post 1088, Porkens wrote:Also you can come back to that tomorrow after auro is dead and say “ aw shucks I guess we should have lynched VP after all”
We are not allowing that lol and there's no way scum!ABR thinks he can get away with such a simple planIn post 1088, Porkens wrote:Also you can come back to that tomorrow after auro is dead and say “ aw shucks I guess we should have lynched VP after all”
so you're venturing down new horizons with Pork to sort ABR? Do you think ABR stands a similar chance flipping red as Auro?Blair wrote:I also thought your strategy of running up one of the hardest to lynch players today was a pretty good idea - so here we are!
Yeah that’s not going to work on me. You lost your “I want people to claim” credibility when you uardpassed on VPBIn post 1093, Albert B. Rampage wrote:How ironic. I'm trying to get Auro to claim right now and you are the one derailing.In post 1087, Porkens wrote:How is it pro town to not get a claim from someone you scumread when you have the chance?
Simple plans are the easiest to get away with, and by the reaction of you and the rest of his defenders, he should be as confident.In post 1095, Morning Tweet wrote:We are not allowing that lol and there's no way scum!ABR thinks he can get away with such a simple planIn post 1088, Porkens wrote:Also you can come back to that tomorrow after auro is dead and say “ aw shucks I guess we should have lynched VP after all”so you're venturing down new horizons with Pork to sort ABR? Do you think ABR stands a similar chance flipping red as Auro?Blair wrote:I also thought your strategy of running up one of the hardest to lynch players today was a pretty good idea - so here we are!
Defender? hardly. However i think scum!ABR wasn't going to switch it up to VP after mislynching Auro in that scenario. That's too blatant-- either ABR/VP are buddies and that's a gambit, ABR is setting VP as a buddy late game in the event he dies, or mayyybe ABR hopes some townie else picks up the torch on VP the next day and he can set that townie up. I think all of those scenarios are more likely for a scum!ABRIn post 1097, Porkens wrote:Simple plans are the easiest to get away with, and by the reaction of you and the rest of his defenders, he should be as confident.In post 1095, Morning Tweet wrote:We are not allowing that lol and there's no way scum!ABR thinks he can get away with such a simple planIn post 1088, Porkens wrote:Also you can come back to that tomorrow after auro is dead and say “ aw shucks I guess we should have lynched VP after all”so you're venturing down new horizons with Pork to sort ABR? Do you think ABR stands a similar chance flipping red as Auro?Blair wrote:I also thought your strategy of running up one of the hardest to lynch players today was a pretty good idea - so here we are!
You think Pork is scum trying to save his buddy? I doubt that, Pork has been consistently obvtownAlbert B. Rampage wrote:That's the same thing Auro said. You won't find me lining up lynches in my iso so your accusations are baseless. I think Auro flips scum and this is a last-ditch attempt to save him.In post 1088, Porkens wrote:Also you can come back to that tomorrow after auro is dead and say “ aw shucks I guess we should have lynched VP after all”
