Open 83 - Polygamist Mafia (Game over!) before 628

chenhsi · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:41 am

True... but it semi-does for other games...

And I won't be prodded a 4th time...

SpyreX · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:23 am

So, we either get to have this game stuck until the 16th or get a wagon in 3 days. Nice!

Nameless · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:58 pm

forbiddanlight wrote:
Vote: Shy Guy
Isn't there already a vote on him?

Hmm. Actually, my vote makes it one vote on each pair, which might be of interest.

Also, 12 days away and self confessed inactivity (#675)

really

should be enough to have chenhsi replaced.

SpyreX · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:01 pm

^ Amen

forbiddanlight · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:34 pm

Hmm. Actually, my vote makes it one vote on each pair, which might be of interest.

Also, 12 days away and self confessed inactivity (#675) really should be enough to have chenhsi replaced.

Ah, well, sorry then. But it's still interesting as you say, and the points not relating to your vote still stand.

Adel · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:51 pm

mod:

would you prod Zeek please?

eldarad · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:42 pm

Vote Count

Skruffs (1) -

Harvey Pew

Firestarter (1) -

Adel

ZeekLTK (1) -

SpyreX

Adel (1) -

ZeekLTK

Shy Guy (1) -

Nameless

Not voting (5) -

Firestarter, Shy Guy, Skruffs, forbiddanlight, chenhsi

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch

looking for a replacement for chenhsi now.
Prodding ZeekLTK

Nameless · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:20 am

Mod

, you missed my vote (#667).

vote count fixed - mod

Skruffs · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:00 am

So not two votes on anyone.
Please recruit someone who likes to talk and doesn't resent being prodded.
Except Battle Mage.
Please do not recruit battle mage.

armlx · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:17 am

Do I count as not Battle Mage?

Rereading, but not today.

eldarad · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:19 am

armix replaces chenhsi.

Thanks for replacing in!

forbiddanlight · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:31 am

Hey armix. I think you count as better than chen

.

Adel · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:08 pm

unvote, vote:ZeekLTK

~~~

@armix, once you've done your reread please provide the name of one player you think is the least likely to be scum, and the name of two non-partners who you think are the most likely to be scum.

armlx · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:39 pm

Adel, I'll one up you on that and give you a full spectrum of people/pairings, categorized into 5 groups by scumminess (Scummy, possible scum, neutral, leaning town, and prob/definitely town).

Adel · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:43 pm

actually, part of the trick depends upon you distilling your opinion down to three names. The rest would be gravy, but please make your three choice distinct from the rest.

armlx · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:49 pm

actually, part of the trick depends upon you distilling your opinion down to three names. The rest would be gravy, but please make your three choice distinct from the rest.

Fair nuff.

SpyreX · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:29 pm

* no metas though.

Jokes aside, glad to see we've got an active pair in. I feel like we've been stagnating some and I want to see some real discussion again.

Skruffs · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:59 am

Don't let Adel tell you what to do, ARmlx. Be as talkative as you wish.
I'm Armlx's lover. I was really hoping for Ether but I'll take what I can get.

Did someone ask me a question?

Adel · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:15 am

Skruffs wrote: I'm Armlx's lover.

Why did you feel it necessary to post this?

armlx · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:45 pm

I don't see why it isn't relevant. I think we should have claimed pairs at the start of the game (I haven't reread, so I don't know if this happened).

SpyreX · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:38 pm

Heh, give a reread then see.

Harvey Pew · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:47 pm

SpyreX wrote:Jokes aside, glad to see we've got an active pair in. I feel like we've been stagnating some and I want to see some real discussion again.

It is not just the lurking, it's this breaking analysis we've been repeatedly promised - and not seen a sign of.

SpyreX · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:23 am

From who? Adel? We're still waiting for everyone to even chime in their answers to that.

How about you, anything to comment on?

Adel · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:12 am

armlx wrote:I don't see why it isn't relevant. I think we should have claimed pairs at the start of the game (I haven't reread, so I don't know if this happened).

Adel wrote:
Skruffs wrote: I'm Armlx's lover.
Why did you feel it necessary to post this?

@Shy Guy: what do you make of this?

Shy Guy · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:23 am

Adel wrote:
armlx wrote:I don't see why it isn't relevant. I think we should have claimed pairs at the start of the game (I haven't reread, so I don't know if this happened).

Adel wrote:
Skruffs wrote: I'm Armlx's lover.
Why did you feel it necessary to post this?
@Shy Guy: what do you make of this?

I'd like to hear Skruffs's response as to why he felt it was necessary to post it.