Open 81 - The New C9 - Game Over

[Rogueben]

As the day comes to a close the town decides that BlakAdder must be mafia. As he is dragged to the scaffold to be hanged he protests that he is merely an innocent townie. Not listening to him the town strings him up and hangs him until dead.

Having done this they decide to work out whether he was actually mafia, and upon further investigation they find that he was actually a

townie

.

The deadline for night choices is

Friday 1st August at 2:00 am GMT

.

[Rogueben]

I have decided in the interests of keeping the days running smoothly I will be imposing fixed deadlines from tomorrow onwards.

While there are more than 12 players the deadlines will be 4 weeks. When it gets to 12 players the deadline will be three weeks. I will allow one deadline extension of a week if a majority of players request it and I may give an extension to allow a replacement to catch up.

[Rogueben]

The morning dawns and you awaken, hoping to find a more peaceful town.

This hope is shattered when you find the body of Lowell shot straight through the head. He was a regular townie.

Venturing out a little further you recoil in horror when you see not one but two bodies lying next to each other. Evidently the local serial killer Sun Tzu decided that iamusername looked like someone who was easy prey. Having stabbed him in the back iamusername turned around and clobbered Sun Tzu in the head with a leadpipe. It seems he was neither easy prey, nor innocent. iamusername was mafia.

Start Day 2

The deadline for Day 2 will be 29th August at 2:00 AM GMT.

[ting =)]

Hm.

SC, did you target Lowell?

[Korts]

Interesting.

Ting, what do you think the answer to that question could be? Since there were two crosskills, I doubt SC could've targeted anyone else.

[Muerrto]

Um...well that loses any suspiscion I had of GS/Ting.

So SC killed Lowell and the mafia killed Sun Tzu?

[Korts]

vote: armlx

We're back to the armlx-hating, only now with added

sugar

proof!

IAUN kept following armlx's reasoning and protected him on the vig issue.

[The Fonz]

Um...well that loses any suspiscion I had of GS/Ting.

Really? Because it increases mine. I really thought the manner in which GS pushed IAAUN before dropping it with no explanation looked like distancing.

[armlx]

IAUN kept following armlx's reasoning and protected him on the vig issue.

You mean the vig issue that we should be killing every night, which is mathematically proven better?

[Korts]

Um...well that loses any suspiscion I had of GS/Ting.

Really? Because it increases mine. I really thought the manner in which GS pushed IAAUN before dropping it with no explanation looked like distancing.

QFT

But armlx is looking worse right now, I think.

[armlx]

But armlx is looking worse right now, I think.

Sorry to ruin your day, but 1) infi people agreed on the vig thing and 2) scum barning someone is no where indicative of a connection. Protecting yes, and the GS attack then back of yes, but barning like that is more commonly associated with "buddying", where a scum player tries to garner the favor of someone who is active in town discussion to avoid their suspicion.

[Korts]

But armlx is looking worse right now, I think.

Sorry to ruin your day, but 1) infi people agreed on the vig thing and 2) scum barning someone is no where indicative of a connection. Protecting yes, and the GS attack then back of yes, but barning like that is more commonly associated with "buddying", where a scum player tries to garner the favor of someone who is active in town discussion to avoid their suspicion.

It is associated both with "buddying" and "partnership." Sorry. I'm voting for the latter.

[Korts]

IAUN kept following armlx's reasoning and protected him on the vig issue.

You mean the vig issue that we should be killing every night, which is mathematically proven better?

No, I mean when I called you out for what I thought to be claiming non-vig, he immediately jumped on me.

[iamausername]

Dammit, people need to stop NKing me. Go scum!

[armlx]

It is associated both with "buddying" and "partnership." Sorry. I'm voting for the latter.

Why? Do you have any logical reason outside of this supposed connection to believe I am scum?

No, I mean when I called you out for what I thought to be claiming non-vig, he immediately jumped on me.

Your point?

[forbiddanlight]

Well, I'm actually a little less suspicious of Ting/GS myself (though I didn't suspect them much in the first place). Those leading questions were pretty funny and I wish I hadn't dropped that so fast. I'm not sure what to think of armix, I still don't see that great a case. SC is pretty much confirmed, and rofl and Iron Man are mostly confirmed. The Tin Vision/BlakAdder connection obviously didn't play out, but I think I'll be rereading tin because I still don't like the vibes I'm getting.

[ting =)]

@korts.
It should be:
'SC,

why

did you target Lowell?'

I ask because he wouldn't have been my top choice for vigging.

@fonz.

Well obviously it seems like no one else holds the same feelings about iamausername as I do so my single vote won't do much good.

[ting =)]

Oh, I just browsed through SC's posts. He had his vote on Lowell. nvm the question.

[StrangerCoug]

SC, did you target Lowell?

Yes. As for the reason, I wasn't too happy with his driving the masons to claim, and he picked bad reasons for voting for sun tzu and GreasySpot/you (testing for reactions outside of random voting).

I'm surprised the masons and I didn't get killed last night, actually.

[forbiddanlight]

I'm surprised the masons and I didn't get killed last night, actually.

I'm not. They aren't harmful til later game. And if enough people think like Muerrto, there won't even be wasted night kills for the scum cause we'll do their work for them :S.

[strife220]

Vote: Muerrto

D1 when everyone was pushing the Vamp vig, IAUN pulled the "GS would also make a good vig..."

Greasy Spot would make an excellent vig kill.

Indirect way of trying to save Vamp from a vig-kill when he was a nearly unanimous decision for viging. Subtle scum-buddy tactic. See page 14 and 15.

[forbiddanlight]

Good catch. I still gotta relook at tin when I get home again today.

[StrangerCoug]

Vote: Muerrto

D1 when everyone was pushing the Vamp vig, IAUN pulled the "GS would also make a good vig..."

Greasy Spot would make an excellent vig kill.

Indirect way of trying to save Vamp from a vig-kill when he was a nearly unanimous decision for viging. Subtle scum-buddy tactic. See page 14 and 15.

I'll take a good look at this.

Major HoS: Muerrto

pending my read of those two pages.

[StrangerCoug]

OK, I've looked, and I do believe that iamausername has attempted to create a distraction to save Vamparific/Muerrto. Upgrade to a

Vote: Muerrto

, but looking at the same discussion and the one about the four points IAUN brought up makes me want to throw a

Minor FoS: Korts

. Not 100% sure why I suspect him as it is a gut feeling right now.

[armlx]

'SC, why did you target Lowell?'

Does that matter? SC is confirmed vig now.

D1 when everyone was pushing the Vamp vig, IAUN pulled the "GS would also make a good vig..."

Good call.

FoS Muerrto

FoS Korts

for the reasons from yesterday and the crap logic push today. Not sure which is the better vote though.