SSW III: Game over

[Battle Mage]

You are so illogical dude. I dont even see much point talking to you. When the town is ready to hang you, i'll be waiting.

Whatever, just keep seeing what you want to see.

What i want to see is you dead. Can the fairy grant my wish now?

BM

At this point I would almost be willing to grant that wish, just so I can laugh at you and cement to the rest of the town that you are an idiot. But that would be like OMGUS to the extreme.

You dont think thats a tad hypocritcal when you are voting for ME atm? roflmao!

only if I was actually trying to get you lynched. Which we have established I am not.

If you are voting for me, you are trying to get me lynched. The two go hand in hand. And you've adamantly refused to unvote.

BM

Vote count

(16 players alive = 9 to lynch before deadline)
(7) M4yhem – farside22, SpyreX, SleepyPanda, Wall-E, Cass, Empking, Grimmy
(3) Wall-E – donkeyz12212, CoheedCambria09, Lord Gurgi
(1) cerebus3 – Battle Mage
(1) Empking – M4yhem
(1) Battle Mage – cerebus3

Not voting:

ace1217, Porkens, Septia

Deadline:

Thursday 31 July 2:00 PM (GMT -5 according to forum clock)

[cerebus3]

Ya, I am really pushing that bandwagon on you hard aint I?

[SpyreX]

Lord, I must just be in a different timezone because this game sure gets active when I'm not here.

I'm not seeing the case on Cerebus at all this point - but the amazing amount of noise thats being introduced because of it is awesome.

If I'm an idiot for making someone who softclaimed on his approach to hammer finish his claim, then I am - thats fine. Softclaiming is ridiculous.

As it sits and I stated, I think M4hyem has been scummy from the whole lynch-move business and, surprise, no one else as struck me as being as scummy yet.

Like BM, I'm very sure about Sleepy / Wall-E being town at this point.

[Wall-E]

After re-reading the thread I feel compelled to re-emphasize my

M4yhem

vote.

[Wall-E]

Also casting a HOS on the old married couple that is BM and Cerberus.

[M4yhem]

Spyre-x; you find me scummy for coming to my senses and backing away from a bad lynch?

Why are the people who didn't back away less scummy?

This bandwagon is baseless. My behavior has been reckless maybe but not at all indicative of scum. You'd be better served by looking at the people voting for me, some of which also voted for Panda and Wall-E beside me and are therefore shameless hypocrites.

[Porkens]

vote: M4yhem

[cerebus3]

mayhems at -1...

[M4yhem]

I hope you'll look at porkens and others who have voted for me without reasoning after I'm gone.

I claim werewolf townie.

[Johoohno]

Mod note:

ace1217

is replaced by

raider8169

, effective immediately.

[M4yhem]

God, this is so annoying!

I really think the entire case on me is idiotic. Scum players do not act the way I've been acting. I don't care if you say it's wifom, scum don't like attention so they would never do the things that I've been doing.

So I bandwaggoned a few people, so what? So did most of the town. The only difference is I was honest about my reasons for doing so and for this honesty you are going to kill me.

Why can't you see that it is the people who bandwagon without advertising it that are the dangerous ones? I am simply their latest target of opportunity.

[SleepyPanda]

God, this is so annoying!

I really think the entire case on me is idiotic. Scum players do not act the way I've been acting. I don't care if you say it's wifom, scum don't like attention so they would never do the things that I've been doing.

So I bandwaggoned a few people, so what? So did most of the town. The only difference is I was honest about my reasons for doing so and for this honesty you are going to kill me.

Why can't you see that it is the people who bandwagon without advertising it that are the dangerous ones? I am simply their latest target of opportunity.

It's because the way you've acted no way benefits town at all. But, it does benefit scum. You chalk it up to just messing around, but why? All of a sudden you decide to do so? It seems very illogical to me.

[M4yhem]

Why did I decide to mess around?

I blame BM. His enthusiasm for the quicklynch was contagious.

I liked wagonning you, it was fun and Wall-E had said some strange things so wagonning him seemed the best next step.

But outing a powerrole is not fun.

It might seem illogical to you but only if you assume that my actions are always sensible.

I don't see how my actions would benefit scum. Bandwagonning maybe yes, but bandwagonning while loudly announcing what you're doing, not so much.

[SpyreX]

I dont find you scummy for "coming to your senses" - I find you scummy for the series of actions that led to it. I posted why I thought you were being scummy and nothing you've said has really made me think any of that was less so.

I blame BM. His enthusiasm for the quicklynch was contagious.

That was a real quick turnaround you had from being initially opposed to it to wanting to quicklynch. Also, avoiding the fact so many people had chimed in saying it was a bad idea (once Panda's stalled) really puts that in question.

I don't see how my actions would benefit scum. Bandwagonning maybe yes, but bandwagonning while loudly announcing what you're doing, not so much.

We were ONE away from killing a power-role and you asked for a hammer before a claim - you can't see how that would benefit scum?

FoS: Porkens

- Jumping on that late without a reason is very suspicious.

[Cass]

This bandwagon is baseless. My behavior has been reckless maybe but not at all indicative of scum. You'd be better served by looking at the people voting for me, some of which also voted for Panda and Wall-E beside me and are therefore shameless hypocrites.

It is shamelessly hypocritical to vote for someone after you have already voted for someone else (for entirely different reasons I might add)? That would make playing this game pretty tough. It also implicates

all

of the active players (Btw, bandwagoning is not at all my reason for voting you. It is the way you jump on and off and the way you fail to defend your actions.)

M4yhem, you sound more and more desperate.

BM, try tunneling on M4yhem for a bit, might be more interesting. You can go back to Ceberus or Donkey tomorrow, as long as you stop f**king around with joke-claims or whatever that was supposed to be.

[Battle Mage]

I'd like to make it quite clear at this time, that i think M4yhem is town. At great risk of this backfiring in my face, i figure openness is the best policy.

BM

[Cass]

And what makes you so convinced of that?

[Battle Mage]

This bandwagon is baseless. My behavior has been reckless maybe but not at all indicative of scum. You'd be better served by looking at the people voting for me, some of which also voted for Panda and Wall-E beside me and are therefore shameless hypocrites.

It is shamelessly hypocritical to vote for someone after you have already voted for someone else (for entirely different reasons I might add)? That would make playing this game pretty tough. It also implicates

all

of the active players (Btw, bandwagoning is not at all my reason for voting you. It is the way you jump on and off and the way you fail to defend your actions.)

Rofl. For the record, this is exactly what Cass herself did.

BM, try tunneling on M4yhem for a bit, might be more interesting. You can go back to Ceberus or Donkey tomorrow, as long as you stop f**king around with joke-claims or whatever that was supposed to be.

Why? it's funny, and its the only thing keeping me sane in this game atm. 0.o

BM

[Battle Mage]

And what makes you so convinced of that?

Admittedly i havent read this case on him yet. Havent had time with you ridiculously active people posting every 20 seconds! But currently, i see nothing to suggest he is scum.

BM

[Cass]

Exactly what I did? I think I have been pretty clear on my reasons for being on each of the wagons. What is it you still fail to understand about my voting pattern? Because I'd be glad to explain. Again.

To me, Cerebus' reason to switch off Panda to Wall-E seems legitimate enough, even if I do not agree with it - it does make sense to lynch an inactive with the quicklynch idea -, and his responses to you are not particularly scummy. I couldn't say about Donkey, as I said he might be scum. For both players I'd need more evidence before I'd vote them.

[Cass]

Admittedly i havent read this case on him yet.

Copied for emphasis.

Admittedly i havent read this case on him yet.

*facepalm*

Ya, can't argue with that reasoning.

[farside22]

I'd like to make it quite clear at this time, that i think M4yhem is town. At great risk of this backfiring in my face, i figure openness is the best policy.

BM

Why? Seriously I keep asking and you never answer.

[CoheedCambria09]

hey, so first off

unvote

, i must of missed the post about not quicklynching anymore.

Second I'm going to believe all four claims for the moment(panda=townie, Wall-E=tracker,BM=1shotkill, Mayhem=townie) if all those claims are true then its narrowed down our selection quiet a bit.

The whole exchange between Cerebus/Bm seemed like just background noise to me, with nothing significant going on. But since BM has claimed his role im going to

vote:Cerebus3

[SpyreX]

... What?

Explain why you believe all 4 of those claims.

[CoheedCambria09]

I dont believe them all 100% but by believing them somewhat it helps narrow down a choice for a lynch today. Then we can go back and look at the claims and see what comes of them.