is there a case, other than the fact he is active and does what he is told?SleepyPanda wrote:But I prefer my shiny new M4yhem wagon.Battle Mage wrote:In that case, why wont you hop aboard the Cerebus-Donkey train?
BM
BM
is there a case, other than the fact he is active and does what he is told?SleepyPanda wrote:But I prefer my shiny new M4yhem wagon.Battle Mage wrote:In that case, why wont you hop aboard the Cerebus-Donkey train?
BM
I'm still awaiting your comments on the Donkey and Cerebus cases.Cass wrote:What Sleepy said. Plus his defense made me feel worse about him, not better.
I consider 'parroting' to be scummy. Why would a townie copy a phrase from somebody word for word? for scum the motive is obvious.SleepyPanda wrote:What does the phrase parroting mean to you? I don't think anyone else is looking into it as much as you are. If this game wasn't nightless, then maybe I'd find it suspicious as it could be used as a secret code, but seeing as how scum can talk during day, it's moot here.
What do you think about M4yhem's case?
p.s. Battle Mage has been a good sport. SWARM SWARM SWARM.
But the phrase DOESNT MAKE SENSE. Unless they knew that Pandakins was town! This is the one slightly dubious thing Mayhem has done, but you guys cant acknowledge that Donkey was as guilty, if not moreso. Thats why i dont hold alot of respect for the case atm.Cass wrote:Maybe he agreed with him? Maybe they're both scum? Who knows - I need more on Donkey before I can judge. Lynching M4yhem might also help with answering that question, don't you think?
So you're willing to lynch him for lurking but not legitimately scummy play? Smooth. Yah, i'm not liking you much atm... lolCass wrote: Look, I'm not arguing that Donkey is town, he just hasn't posted enough for me to get a read on him. If that continues to be the case, he'll definitely rise on my scum-list. I much dislike lurkers.
Neither did i. But lets face it, you've bandwagonned on much less.Cass wrote:I'm willing to lynch him for lurking if he does it consistently. Meaning, not today, perhaps not tomorrow either. But if someone keeps lurking for days on end, I count it as scummy behaviour. For the rest:
- I don't call one scummy phrase a case,
Cass wrote:- I see several scummy things in M4yhems posts (not even counting 'the phrase'),
- so I'm afraid we'll just have to disagree on this one.
Excuse me? I bandwagoned twice: first because I agreed with the quicklynch plan. Second to make Wall-E claim. I don't call that 'much less'. Less evidence, surely, but much bigger reasons.Battle Mage wrote:Neither did i. But lets face it, you've bandwagonned on much less.Cass wrote:I'm willing to lynch him for lurking if he does it consistently. Meaning, not today, perhaps not tomorrow either. But if someone keeps lurking for days on end, I count it as scummy behaviour. For the rest:
- I don't call one scummy phrase a case,
*sigh* That is not at all what I'm saying. I will keep voting who I think is scummiest. And so should you. As soon as something happens that convinces me Donkey (or whoever) is scum, I'll vote them instead - and consistent lurking is only one of many things that could convince me. Can we stop this pointless discussion now?Cass wrote:- I see several scummy things in M4yhems posts (not even counting 'the phrase'),
- so I'm afraid we'll just have to disagree on this one.
I guess i'll just wait a few days and come back when half the town is dead then?
BM
Your post 188 says otherwise. Getting a full claim was a shite idea. You've wagonned 2 townies, neither of whom you found scummy. What does that say about you?Cass wrote:Excuse me? I bandwagoned twice: first because I agreed with the quicklynch plan. Second to make Wall-E claim. I don't call that 'much less'. Less evidence, surely, but much bigger reasons.Battle Mage wrote:Neither did i. But lets face it, you've bandwagonned on much less.Cass wrote:I'm willing to lynch him for lurking if he does it consistently. Meaning, not today, perhaps not tomorrow either. But if someone keeps lurking for days on end, I count it as scummy behaviour. For the rest:
- I don't call one scummy phrase a case,
Oh thats great. So when i think someone is scum, in order to get them lynched, i have to somehow*sigh* That is not at all what I'm saying. I will keep voting who I think is scummiest. And so should you. As soon as something happens that convinces me Donkey (or whoever) is scum, I'll vote them instead - and consistent lurking is only one of many things that could convince me. Can we stop this pointless discussion now?Cass wrote:- I see several scummy things in M4yhems posts (not even counting 'the phrase'),
- so I'm afraid we'll just have to disagree on this one.
I guess i'll just wait a few days and come back when half the town is dead then?
BM
It gets points across, so its all good as long as it doesnt result in mindless name callingCass wrote:@BM: Clearly you're not even reading my posts. You also seem to have a problem with people not sharing your opinions. I'm sorry, but I can't help you with that.
Quiet is bad in this game. Even the back and forth between you two helps get your points across.@All: My apologies for spamming this game with pointless bickering. I'll shut up for a while now.
This is precisely why I did what I did.Battle Mage wrote:The way this game works, if you get under pressure and you have a power role, you MUST claim asap. I'd rather see a tracker get NKed than lynched, and dont forget, theres a very good chance we have a doctor still hidden out there somewhere.
BM
Which seems to me like he is preparing his defence for when I flip town. Clearly, he will say I deserved it for acting like an idiot. While that might be slightly true, it won't change the face that you'll be down one protown member and Empking will have helped to kill me.Empking wrote: He's admitted that he plays in an anti-town manner so lynching him seems to be a win whatever he turns up as (as long as it isn't a power role, but he'd claim)
Now you really are making shit up. I said that lynching panda would accomplish nothing because I thought he was town, and I was trying to convince PEOPLE TO WAGON WALL-E INSTEAD. Once again you are implying that I said I thought WALL-E was town, which I NEVER SAID OR IMPLIED. Panda had said that he was willing to lynch himself just to ensure a quick-lynch, but sense I thought he was town I thought that would acomplish nothing, so we should wagon someone else.Battle Mage wrote:But that's just the thing. You WEREN'T talking about the panda wagon specifically. If you had been, your comments would have made no sense, as your argument was that the policy as a whole would ALWAYS FAIL. Hence, by definition, you declared knowledge that at the very least, the two major bandwagons at the time (in a state of flux as i recall) were both leading towards mislynches. And with the 2 claims we have now, this view is confirmed. Hence my suspicion of you is even stronger.
Where? You have been saying this all game but you havent shown where I said this.BM wrote:A chance? Lol.Cerebus wrote: And I APPROVED of the WALL-E wagon, obviously I think there is a chance he can flip scum.
Not buying it kiddo. You pretty much admitted that you knew he was town. Of course you arent going to advertise this, because you were trying to get him lynched. But the fact remains that you knew more than you were saying.
AND PANDA HAD DOME NOTHING SCUMMY WHATSOEVER!!! It is like Wall-e had 1 scummy point, and panda had 0. Obv Wall-E is the better wagon.BM wrote:IT WAS A RANDOM F*KING VOTE!!!!!ONE!Because he was using crap logic to vote for panda. That was certainly more than the case against Panda now aint it?Sorry, i meant Wall-E. Embarassed
Same question, names transposed. Razz
What the hell did you expect??
Half of us voted Panda for nothing. At least Wall-E had some reasoning!
It looks like you don't like you he said panda was a good sport and voted someone else saying he was less active. What a case!BM wrote:You should read my original quote of Donkey and subsequent comments and tell me what you think.Cerebus wrote:I don't really get the case at all.I think the case on Donkey is better. What about you?
BM
BM
What the hell are you talking about BM? Too scared to OMGUS you? Why should I vote you, unless you are admitting that you ARE acting scummy?BM wrote: Good spot Sherlock. I'm caught red-handed again! Yep i am trying to invoke a reaction from you. What unnerves me the most is how aware you are of how you look to others. Too scared to practice what you preach because you know it will gain you heat. Now THAT is scummy.
Do you think the wagon on panda shouldn't have been derailed? If me and donkey were scum why would we do that?Grimmy wrote:BM: While I DO see you case for Donkey and cerebus (derailing the quicklynch of panda by starting a supposed quick lynch of Wall E, which delayed the lynch long enough for it to be inneffective)
I also feel stronger about the Mayhem wagon, and I think that your case against the other two would gain more ground tomorrow, pending the night actions.
That said
Vote: M4yhem
Fos: Cerrebus and Donkey
Grimmy
thinks this wagon has buitl up more speed.