Guns & Roses IV [Game Over]

[chkflip]

His posts.

[chkflip]

Nope.

I mean, this is the third time I've had to say it but here goes. Saying someone is posting somewhere else but not here is in poor taste, it's against the spirit of the game, and it isn't a scum tell. The way you're doing it is tangential at best and worthless at worst.

This is also the second time I've had to say that talking about ongoing games is against site rules. Not saying mini x or micro y doesn't matter. You're talking about ongoing games regardless. And, again, it's tangential. It's not evidence for anything.

Please stop doing it.

Just because I happen to post in my mish mashes and not here doesn't mean I'm scum. It means I'm posting there and not here and that's it.

[farside22]

Nope.

I mean, this is the third time I've had to say it but here goes. Saying someone is posting somewhere else but not here is in poor taste, it's against the spirit of the game, and it isn't a scum tell. The way you're doing it is tangential at best and worthless at worst.

This is also the second time I've had to say that talking about ongoing games is against site rules. Not saying mini x or micro y doesn't matter. You're talking about ongoing games regardless. And, again, it's tangential. It's not evidence for anything.

Please stop doing it.

Just because I happen to post in my mish mashes and not here doesn't mean I'm scum. It means I'm posting there and not here and that's it.

Okay so I can see from your history that lurking is not a tell. I would hard disagree with you, but it isn't against "the spirit of mafia". Many players, including myself, look at it as a scum tell. It depends on the player, the situation of the game, ect.
Second I will concede that mention an ongoing game as a reference is in poor taste. If the kids game ends before this one does (and I'm not dead) I will use it as quickly as possible.

[SirCakez]

Paragon is right Ico is scummy

better get used to it

do your "obvtown" thing then

tbh I'm now worried Ico is lynchbait

[chkflip]

Faraide, I'm not saying I don't think lurking is a scum tell. I'm disagreeing with the way you're going about it.

Cake, yes.

[chkflip]

Damn near half the game is sitting at around a day from their last post. Are the lurking? Is that information particularly telling or useful at this point in the game? I don't really think so.

[farside22]

Damn near half the game is sitting at around a day from their last post. Are the lurking? Is that information particularly telling or useful at this point in the game? I don't really think so.

I don't see a way to move this forward without other players comments.
Maria, Knight.....hell I would take views for Fire or ABR just to get some content in here that helps solve the game.

[Albert B. Rampage]

There's only so much navel gazing I can tolerate. Just vote for the largest wagon and be done with day 1.

[chkflip]

Absolutely. All I'm saying is "this person is lurking here!" is kind of a moot point when almost half the base are doing it and, while all scum might be in that list (it's possible), they can't all be scum. So it's not very reliable in and of itself.

Pedit: Jesus Albert.

[Albert B. Rampage]

BLABLA READS BLABLA CONTENT

[chkflip]

What are your reads?

[farside22]

Absolutely. All I'm saying is "this person is lurking here!" is kind of a moot point when almost half the base are doing it and, while all scum might be in that list (it's possible), they can't all be scum. So it's not very reliable in and of itself.

Pedit: Jesus Albert.

Do I need to point out the difference between a game start vs a point were those that have been active are now waiting for said lurker/people to catch up?

There's only so much navel gazing I can tolerate. Just vote for the largest wagon and be done with day 1.

*sigh*

[SirCakez]

Faraide, I'm not saying I don't think lurking is a scum tell. I'm disagreeing with the way you're going about it.

Cake, yes.

yes what?

[chkflip]

tbh I'm now worried Ico is lynchbait

Yes.

[SirCakez]

ah
this game is weirdly dead

[chkflip]

Iconeum [1] - votato
farside22 [1] - Vecna
Firebringer [1] - MariaR

Not Voting [1] - Something_Smart

All this needs to change ASAP. Especially S_S.

[Albert B. Rampage]

MariaR never came back lmao

[SirCakez]

tbh I'd be satisfied with most any of the wagons

[lilith2013]

Sorry friends - very busy week at work I’ll try to catch up soon.

[votato]

I dont like any of the wagons currently. I don't particularly like eyestott's iso, but it reads not like scum so much as confused town. Advocating for the massclaim and then attacking KM for doing the same reads to me as a townie who changed his mind. It seems like a bad scumplay to attract attention like that. KM is again just new. I have some experience with KM and read him as town. If myself/eyestott/KM are basically policy lynches then maybe? but seems like kind of a waste. if it really is bad for me not to be on a wagon, ill UNVOTE: ico and VOTE: farside. I guess I don't see why we need to be pushing so hard at anyone yet.

[chkflip]

Because there's 4 days left and stalling the day is only helpful to scum.

[lilith2013]

No one else is voting farside, Vecna is now voting Cakes

[farside22]

No one else is voting farside, Vecna is now voting Cakes

Biggest wagons are votato or eye.

It must be nice to just vote someone and ignore responding to that person.
Can i do that too please?

[farside22]

I will tldr my reason my vote on votato hasn't changed is the a few reason he called me scummy multiple player have done the same thing. 1) making a scum list with players listed as a scum read.
2) hiding the reason for my reads, again many have done this and he isnt calling them out to explain.
3) using strawman arguments to make a case.
In short his whole scum read is based on nothing more then omgus and things he hasnt called anyone out on doing the same fucking thing.

[votato]

I will tldr my reason my vote on votato hasn't changed is the a few reason he called me scummy multiple player have done the same thing. 1) making a scum list with players listed as a scum read.
2) hiding the reason for my reads, again many have done this and he isnt calling them out to explain.
3) using strawman arguments to make a case.
In short his whole scum read is based on nothing more then omgus and things he hasnt called anyone out on doing the same fucking thing.

I'm not ignoring you. I don't feel like you properly addressed most of the things I said, but no one else seems to see what I saw. I'm thinking that our interaction is probably counterproductive right now. I'd rather not get tunneled on you, so I'm going to sit back and let people who are more competent and confident do their thing. I'm going to leave my vote on you until i find a better place to put it, but I'm not going to be aggressive either, at least for now. I definitely don't like any of the current wagons though.