Mini 622 - Mind Screw Mafia - Das ist alles!

[MafiaSSK]

I personally don't want to use my role power, unless a doctor dies. I also believe I can only revive pro-town roles.

No. You're using your power on the first pro-town player you get the chance to, because we want proof that you actually have this power, and when we reach endgame, it doesn't matter what other powers they have; confirmed town status is incredibly useful in itself.

And, yeah, I'd like to see a flavour explanation for why you can revive people. And if you're not sure about exactly how your role works (like, whether you can use both your powers in one night), then PM the mod and find out. You should do that as soon as you read the role PM.

Fine, I'll try and use my power on a pro-town player.

Also, you want me to PM a ridiculously bastardous bastard mod and ask them for more information about my role? He'll probably just tell me to figure it out from the little I have.

[iamausername]

You'll never know if you don't try.

[Battousai]

UNVOTE, UNFOS

I would ask people to unvote MafiaSSK for right now. The reason being, I don't see

Tar

, a mod making a mafia member easier to lynch. But I can see a reviver type role needing less to be voted for if outed or something like that.

It's interesting that either Tar has messed up the FOS count, changed it, or that Jex can't be FOS'd (I tried FOSing him directly and through Cavebear).

Post numbers of the FoS'es, please? - Tar

[MafiaSSK]

You'll never know if you don't try.

So I did ask Tar and it turns out it was an error in my interpretation. I can not revive dead players.

[Macavenger]

The reason being, I don't see Tar, a mod making a mafia member easier to lynch. But I can see a reviver type role needing less to be voted for if outed or something like that.

Justification? I see no basis for this. There is a clear provision in the rules that could apply to any player becoming easier to lynch.

Love how SSK has now backtracked the confirmable part of his role. So, what are your actual abilities, SSK?

Vote is staying on SSK until he starts doing some actual scumhunting.

[iamausername]

That's a pretty big error. Please explain what your role actually does, what the flavour reasons for your abilities are, and how exactly you came to make such a huge misinterpretation.

[MafiaSSK]

I believe I have claimed my only actual ability. Look at my original claim post.

[iamausername]

Yes, so what made you think you could revive anyone?

[iamausername]

I can also Cheat Death where

if I'm killed in any way

it is revealed as an elaborate ruse by the other players and I am not killed. However, I can only do this once.

Does this include lynching?

[MafiaSSK]

Yes, so what made you think you could revive anyone?

I cannot say without getting modkilled, in which if I did I don't think my other ability would save me.

[MafiaSSK]

I can also Cheat Death where

if I'm killed in any way

it is revealed as an elaborate ruse by the other players and I am not killed. However, I can only do this once.

Does this include lynching?

Yup.

[Battousai]

NVM Tar, I got confused because I keep forgetting to UNFOS people.

Mac: I don't think scum would intentionally lower the amount of votes needed to lynch their own. I also don't see a protown player doing that as well. I also don't see a mod lowering the amount of votes needed to lynch scum. Also, MafiaSSK was at L-1 and I do not think he needs to be that close to a lynch.

"There is a clear provision in the rules that could apply to any player becoming easier to lynch. "

Which rule? I just looked at them and I did not see any rule that states that a player who does xxx will need less votes to be lynched or any of the sort.

[iamausername]

Which rule? I just looked at them and I did not see any rule that states that a player who does xxx will need less votes to be lynched or any of the sort.

This one:

<19> Game-specific rule: Whenever a player breaks a rule that is not punishable by modkill, they will be informed that they have committed a rule infraction and told the post number where they broke a rule.

For every 5 rules infractions incurred, the guilty player will require 1 fewer vote to lynch

. (If the rule broken was a temporary rule, then its associated rules infractions will be removed when the rule is removed.)

I think there could be any number of other reasons that SSK requires one less vote to lynch, though.

Unvote, Vote: Jex

[MafiaSSK] again, since my reason for unvoting him is now gone. His actual role is also testable, but one-shot unkillable could easily be town or scum.

[Battousai]

O, ok. I guess my reasoning for trying to get someone to unvote him is no longer justified to me. So I guess I'll take that back, but I would prefer if he would not get to L-1.

[Yosarian2]

All right. I'm going to claim before we go to night here. (In case anyone is wondering, I ran this paraphrase past the mod, and he declared it an acceptable paraphrase of my role.)

I'm The Star Child (from 2001: A Space Odyssey). I'm basically a day 3 survivor. All I have to do is live until the end of day 3, and I can leave this universe, and leave the rest of you in peace. I'm just claiming this because I don't want the scum to try to kill me again; there's really no point in doing that, guys, because I'm leaving the game tommorow; it'd just be a wasted kill.

So, yeah. After the scum tried to kill me last night, I've figured I was basically lynch-proof, so I was just worried about the scum kill. Which is why I've been trying to be basically worthless to the town for most of today, was I was trying to get the scum to not kill me. Bah...I hate being a survivor.

So, anyway, yeah. I'm here. Just ignore me, I'll go away soon.

[MafiaSSK]

Why were we going to go into night?

[Macavenger]

Why were we going to go into night?

Probably because you're being lynched? If you actually do take one less than normal votes to lynch, you're at L-1. Feel like scumhunting at all yet?

Also, Yos's most recent post explains much.

[Yosarian2]

Yup. I'm not actually this bad of a player.

[Tarhalindur]

"Random mythology trivia of the day: the Tuatha de Danaan ("people of [the goddess] Dana") were the last generation of gods before the arrival of humans in Irish mythology. Now, why am I bringing this up?"

Multiple Vote Counts have been repaired due to an error in tallying a FoS. - Tar

The Thirtieth Vote Count (aka the "Bastard Mod? No, Never!... Well, Hardly Ever." Vote Count):

Vote Count:

Battousai (0)
remussaidow (0)
MafiaSSK (4)
Grimmy (rep. Musher333) (0)
Macavenger (0)
Cavebear with a toothache (0)
Jex (0) - Macavenger, Nocmen, Cavebear with a toothache, iamausername
Nocmen (0)
Yosarian2 (0)
iamausername (0)

Not Voting (6): MafiaSSK, Grimmy (rep. Musher333), Jex, Yosarian2, remussaidow

Votes required to lynch: 6 (5 for MafiaSSK)

FoS Count:

Battousai (1) - Yosarian2
remussaidow (1) - Nocmen
MafiaSSK (0)
Grimmy (rep. Musher333) (0)
Macavenger (0)
Cavebear with a toothache (0)
Jex (1) - Battousai
Nocmen (0)
Yosarian2 (0)
iamausername (1) - Macavenger

Current Deadline:

July 25, 2008

Second and Final Mod Deadline Review:

July 18, 2008

[Battousai]

Vote: Musher333

, I don't like your recent posts. Your contradictions for my posts are poor, case is bad. You then switch back to MafiaSSK, which to me looks like you're voting him because there's a wagon on him now (as I don't know why you unvoted him in the first place that could later be dropped to later let you vote him)

[Tarhalindur]

"Nothing to see here. Move along, move along."

The Thirty-First Vote Count (aka the "Lynch -1..." Vote Count):

Vote Count:

Battousai (0)
remussaidow (0)
MafiaSSK (4)
Grimmy (rep. Musher333) (0)
Macavenger (0)
Cavebear with a toothache (0)
Jex (0) - Macavenger, Nocmen, Cavebear with a toothache, iamausername
Nocmen (0)
Yosarian2 (0)
iamausername (0)
Musher333 (1) - Battousai

Not Voting (5): MafiaSSK, Grimmy (rep. Musher333), Jex, Yosarian2, remussaidow

Votes required to lynch: 6 (5 for MafiaSSK)

FoS Count:

Battousai (1) - Yosarian2
remussaidow (1) - Nocmen
MafiaSSK (0)
Grimmy (rep. Musher333) (0)
Macavenger (0)
Cavebear with a toothache (0)
Jex (1) - Battousai
Nocmen (0)
Yosarian2 (0)
iamausername (1) - Macavenger

Current Deadline:

July 25, 2008

Second and Final Mod Deadline Review:

July 18, 2008

[remussaidow]

batt, you may want to reconsider that vote. Grimmy is the player now playing mushers spot, and we can still vote outside the game.

[Battousai]

This game is making me mad...., I thought voting musher votes iamausername. Who do I vote for that....

[remussaidow]

voting grimmy, since musher was replaced out, will vote whoever voting musher would have voted for.

Ding ding ding! We have a WINNER! - Tar

[iamausername]

Which is me, as Battousai intended.

Vote: Musher333

, I don't like your recent posts. Your contradictions for my posts are poor, case is bad. You then switch back to MafiaSSK, which to me looks like you're voting him because there's a wagon on him now (as I don't know why you unvoted him in the first place that could later be dropped to later let you vote him)

When I unvoted SSK, there was just as much of a wagon on him as there is now, so I don't see how you can say I'm only voting him because of that.

And I've already stated pretty clearly why I dropped my vote and why I've returned to it, but I'll explain again; he said he could revive a player, that is an easily testable ability that I don't believe scum would have. He has since retracted that claim, thus I am voting him again.