Unless it is from the hood with Gamma.....he is lying.
No. He said traffic analyst. Your PT with Gamma wouldn't count.
Of course this was after I highlighted the Gamma hood.
Creature put you in the hood with Alch specifically for this to happen. You were adamant about my Lynch, they were stoking the flames to get you to follow up. Creature maybbe inno in this.....but Alch is not.
I love how in the same post Drew tries to say Creature was trying to set him up with the hood choice and then backtracks into saying he might be innocent.
I love how in the same post Drew tries to say Creature was trying to set him up with the hood choice and then backtracks into saying he might be innocent.
Stream of consciousness.
Not a backtrack.
Creature may be scum with you, he may have done this purposely.
So on one hand Egix literally says kill Drew tmrw if Looker is town and guess who dies. Also it makes sense for Alch to invest based on this. I also think if he was scum he had plenty of incentive and room to backtrack and not backtracking would kind of fuck him up.
Otoh Drew has been posting better and vanillaized. I think it is possible scum would vanillaize one of their own to clear them and the BG claim is kind of convenient, but still idk.
I'm having a hard time choosing from Alch, Drew, Creature, and Blatant.
Between Alch and Drew, I'm sure one of them is lying. Though I tend to believe investigatives.
I still don't know if I fully believe Blatant. Again, a prime scum kill N1 since he claimed Doc and nothing happened to him. The last time I played with someone who I thought was a prime scum target at night that didn't get killed that night turned out to be scum, so that's what keeps Blatant on my list. I know that this is a different game and all but it still sits on the back of my mind.
I just didn't like the brashness of Creatures claim push. Seems a perfect way to get targets on the most powerful remaining PRs.