Mini 621 - Pantsville (Game over!)

[Lowell]

^^^ agree with this

[Lowell]

(so of course it would have to be on a different page)

That's right, I agree with the title of the game.

[Yosarian2]

So, Lowell, you going to explain why you claim to suspect me, or what?

[goborage]

More people on the chenhsi wagon please.

It's pretty clear he's a newbie but I'm leaning towards him being newbie scum. As mentioned, his play earlier on was incredibly over-reactive and he has been called out on it. Since then chenhsi has almost completely shut up. I'm guessing he's doing this because he wants to lie low. This is a pro-survival play but anti-town.

Huh?

I didn't post, because I felt like there was nothing to say.

I don't post much if I have nothing to contribute.

I posted in the other game because I had somthing to contribute (my roleclaim).

This strikes me as someone who is uninterested in scum-hunting. Could it be that he already knows who's scum?

@ chenhsi: What do you think of reborn's claim? Do you have thoughts on any of the players?

[Farkshinsoup]

Agreed, gorborage. Chenhsi is back to his lurking ways. I will say it again, lurkers are our worst enemies in a game with a deadline. I'm keeping my vote where it is for now, but if we don't hear from him soon, I'll put it back there.

I still don't like this claim. At all. He has a gun.

What is it about the gun that you don't like? Please elaborate.

[reborn537]

I'm pretty sure I can guess. He thinks I'm covering my tracks in case I get targeted by a weaponsmith or a thief (in this scenario I am mafia). I'm also pretty sure that that's why the GM put the gun in as well, so people would be suspicious of me (more than usual).

[reborn537]

And by the way, I don't die if I hide behind scum.

[reborn537]

(As far as I know)

[ClockworkRuse]

Yos still reads a loooot like scum to me. Go with me on this, people.

I'd love to see reasons on this, if you have any. Quotes, anything you have to prove a point. Otherwise, it looks like you are attempting to get someone lynched because you feel like it.

Re-reading right now, the weekend hindered my time here. So I'm getting right on that.

Reborn had looked scummy but his claim seems legit. I've never played with a hider before, so this should be interesting. In my opinion, the Reborn wagon was understandable. Until Reborn actually claimed, it was incredibly strange that someone would claim like that. I'm still worried that he

might[/b] be scum and we're just buying into it though. So although there is little suspicion there, I'm keeping my eye on Reborn.

So, the case on Chenhsi is that he was over-reactive in the beginning, correct? And now he is lurking? Well, if he lurks too much we could request a prod on him. I'd love to see where pressure on him can take us.

[Yosarian2]

And by the way, I don't die if I hide behind scum.

(As far as I know)

Did you check with the mod about this, reborn?

[chenhsi]

I am here.

I find reborn's claim probably true, although I am suspicious of him of begging to role claim.

[reborn537]

And by the way, I don't die if I hide behind scum.

(As far as I know)

Did you check with the mod about this, reborn?

I have to be careful here because of rule 3. All I can say is that I die when I use my ability on someone killed during the night. I have no knowledge of any other death conditions.

[reborn537]

Also, I'm suspicious of anyone who's trying to seed suspicion on me. It seems like mafia trying to kill me while they can. And can people voting for me please unvote before long - we are on a deadline here, people.

[Yosarian2]

Uh, you can't quote mod pm's, reborn, but you can paraphrase them.

[Quagmire]

More people on the chenhsi wagon please.

It's pretty clear he's a newbie but I'm leaning towards him being newbie scum. As mentioned, his play earlier on was incredibly over-reactive and he has been called out on it. Since then chenhsi has almost completely shut up. I'm guessing he's doing this because he wants to lie low. This is a pro-survival play but anti-town.

Huh?

I didn't post, because I felt like there was nothing to say.

I don't post much if I have nothing to contribute.

I posted in the other game because I had somthing to contribute (my roleclaim).

This strikes me as someone who is uninterested in scum-hunting. Could it be that he already knows who's scum?

@ chenhsi: What do you think of reborn's claim? Do you have thoughts on any of the players?

Bad case.

unvote, vote yosarian2

I agree with Lowell. He's scum.

[reborn537]

Uh, you can't quote mod pm's, reborn, but you can paraphrase them.

In that case I will - I've already received a warning about being too specific.

[Yosarian2]

(nods)

Yup, not suprised.

unvote

vote:Lowell

fos:Quagmire

When Lowell comes up scum, Quagmire's next. I have trouble believing that a pro-town Quagmire would try to prevent me from drawing Lowell into conversation with a threat like this:

yos, quit while you're ahead, before I vote for you too

And then to go ahead and vote me when I continue to ask Lowell questions, without even giving Lowell a chance to answer .

[Yosarian2]

Hmmm...no, that's not right. Since I'm basing this mostly on Quagmire's bizzare actions here (Attacking me for trying to draw Lowell out into coversation, then refusing to say why, and then voting me when I continue to ask Lowell question) the correct move is to lynch Quagmire first and then lynch Lowell tommorow when quagmire comes up scum.

unvote

vote:Quagmire

Not that it really matters, since they're obv both scum, but might as well do this the proper way.

[Quagmire]

Hmmm...no, that's not right. Since I'm basing this mostly on Quagmire's bizzare actions here (Attacking me for trying to draw Lowell out into coversation, then refusing to say why, and then voting me when I continue to ask Lowell question) the correct move is to lynch Quagmire first and then lynch Lowell tommorow when quagmire comes up scum.

unvote

vote:Quagmire

Not that it really matters, since they're obv both scum, but might as well do this the proper way.

I had my reasons for voting you. I still do -- I didn't want to reveal them. I will soon though.

This attack seems forced.

[Lowell]

Damn straight. I'm not about to get blamed for Quag agreeing with me.

Yos, I won't go back right now, but in my initial vote of you I explained that I think you're playing a bit more cautious than when you're town. There was one post in particular that looked opportunistic and odd. Six pages in, that's MORE than enough for a vote.

[Yosarian2]

Not at all.

I was pretty obviously trying to bait Lowell out into an argument, into committing to something, so I could get a read on him since he hasn't said much yet that was useful, and I was surprised to see you suddenly jump in and broadside me out of nowhere in response. Not only did you do that, even more interesting was that you actually seemed to be threating to vote me if I didn't stop doing that, and then refused to explain exactally why you were threatening me. So, obv, I kept demanding answers from Lowell, partly because I still want an explination but mostly because I wanted to see how you would react.

[Yosarian2]

(That was in response to quagmire, obv...simulpost)

[Yosarian2]

Lowell: You're not getting blamed for Quagmire agreeing with you. The suspicious thing here was that Quagmire seemed to be trying to prevent me from even asking you questions.

[Farkshinsoup]

I had my reasons for voting you. I still do -- I didn't want to reveal them. I will soon though.

I'm going to keep my vote on Yos for now, but I await your explanation. If I don't get one soon, I'll be unvoting.

Mod, can we get a prod on Clammy?

He hasn't posted in 6 days.

[Quagmire]

Not at all.

I was pretty obviously trying to bait Lowell out into an argument, into committing to something, so I could get a read on him since he hasn't said much yet that was useful, and I was surprised to see you suddenly jump in and broadside me out of nowhere in response. Not only did you do that, even more interesting was that you actually seemed to be threating to vote me if I didn't stop doing that, and then refused to explain exactally why you were threatening me. So, obv, I kept demanding answers from Lowell, partly because I still want an explination but mostly because I wanted to see how you would react.

1) I'm voting for you for a totally different reason from Lowell, I think. I honestly have no idea whhy he's voting for you, despite his explanation a post or two above. Keep in mind that I still have not read pages 1-4.
2) Never was I trying to get you to stop asking Lowell questions. In fact, at this point, I encourage it.