Pretty sure the part about pink text was about the mod colorIn post 1144, Titus wrote:VCA is for later.In post 1143, Looker wrote:I can never keep up with the vote count or read that pink text.
I am totally ok with a Gamma lynch.
Also, why
Pretty sure the part about pink text was about the mod colorIn post 1144, Titus wrote:VCA is for later.In post 1143, Looker wrote:I can never keep up with the vote count or read that pink text.
I am totally ok with a Gamma lynch.
In post 1117, Doctor Drew wrote:Spoiler:
This game need an injection of some brutal metal.
New Lorna Shore song has some symphonic black metal elements, some melo death, and some brooootal slamming breakdowns.......this should generate some activity in the pit.
If you can elaborate here or via PM, I'm open to altering my mod color going forward if necessary. Can you not keep up because you can't read the text? or are they unrelated issues?In post 1143, Looker wrote:I can never keep up with the vote count or read that pink text.
Post Edit: Meant that Lavender isn't the lynch today, and would prefer Flubb over other candidates.In post 1156, Doctor Drew wrote:Don't think Lavender is the lynch, would honestly prefer Flubb.
But probably also not happening.
Gun to the head, would prefer blantat over Pisskop.
VOTE: Blatant
Roger That!In post 1159, JacksonVirgo wrote:Are we hammering BS? I personally would not like that, but I am biased towards my own reads, still.. ew
Wait what?In post 1160, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Roger That!In post 1159, JacksonVirgo wrote:Are we hammering BS? I personally would not like that, but I am biased towards my own reads, still.. ew
UNVOTE: BS
Let’s have no hammer!
And why blatant over PK?In post 1156, Doctor Drew wrote:Don't think Lavender is the lynch, would honestly prefer Flubb.
But probably also not happening.
Gun to the head, would prefer blantat over Pisskop.
VOTE: Blatant
Browsing BS iso reminds me I want lynch looker, okIn post 751, Blatant Scum wrote:PL. Amazing.In post 502, Looker wrote:I'm more comfortable with an Emperor flippyNips lynch than a pisskop lynch - I feel pisskop has contributed more, and I haven't seen anything worth keeping in Emperor's ISO.
VOTE: Emperor flippyNips
Also, as a heads up, know that I'll vote No Lynch before I bandwagon for bandwagon's sake. Do with that what you will.
What was the point of these questions, and I'm talking about lookerIn post 753, Blatant Scum wrote:4.In post 606, Looker wrote:No.In post 520, pisskop wrote:looker, do you agree with me re:flub?
For Anyone Willing To Answer
- Are we allowed to ask and/or discuss how many mafia members we think there are?
- If you were scum, what lengths would you go to derail a bandwagon? This is assuming it's on one of your less experienced scum members.
I would try to defend my partner a little. But I am more focusing on behaving towny than defending my team as scum.
This is correctIn post 945, Blatant Scum wrote:Pisskop was a better PL than Emperor.
Oof, with game state as dead you can't blame BlatantIn post 951, jjh927 wrote:"Actual" is used here to put emphasis on the fact that while you are voting pisskop, you do not appear to scumread him
YepIn post 954, Blatant Scum wrote:I am having troubles making reads in every single game.
This game is an extreme. I am totally lost here.
When I voted pisskop, no real wagon was made - only PL ones.
Pisskop was better PL than Emperor, so I voted him.
Who is even your slotIn post 957, jjh927 wrote:I was talking about your vote on Pisskop
Emperor was 100% a mislynch from my perspective which actually works in your favour because you were shifting pressure off my slot in a way I can't really see a reason for you to do as scum. It's the main reason this discussion right now is a nice conversational tone while I try and affirm my read on you rather than a hard 1v1
This look like too bold statement for scum crimsonIn post 983, Crimson97 wrote:jjh might have a point with blatant here tho my read on pisskop hadn't changed at all.
Alright yoda/crimson are townIn post 984, Crimson97 wrote:jjh, do you have anything to say about the other people on pisskop's wagon? Including me obviously.
In post 987, jjh927 wrote:Yoda looks towny
Gamma deserves a fairly long description for not much conclusion. He's jumping to conclusions I can understand him making but I don't remember seeing his scumgame so I'd rather not lean on meta too much there and the conclusions are kinda shit. I'd like it if maybe he'd put some stock in my lie detecting rather than continuing to vote Flubber, especially after that upick he technically modded, but I'm not entirely convinced he read the game
Doctor Drew I really need to place properly either by talking to someone else about him or to him about someone else but I need to be in the right mood for either
Oh for fucks sakeIn post 1160, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Roger That!In post 1159, JacksonVirgo wrote:Are we hammering BS? I personally would not like that, but I am biased towards my own reads, still.. ew
UNVOTE: BS
Let’s have no hammer!
What?In post 1172, yurkin wrote:In post 987, jjh927 wrote:Yoda looks towny
Gamma deserves a fairly long description for not much conclusion. He's jumping to conclusions I can understand him making but I don't remember seeing his scumgame so I'd rather not lean on meta too much there and the conclusions are kinda shit. I'd like it if maybe he'd put some stock in my lie detecting rather than continuing to vote Flubber, especially after that upick he technically modded, but I'm not entirely convinced he read the game
Doctor Drew I really need to place properly either by talking to someone else about him or to him about someone else but I need to be in the right mood for either
Wild guess but jjh927 probably prevails in his scum game, and probably deserved