Ok, that's fine. I find lurking scummy, especially in games that have deadlines. If you find that suspicious, then so be it.clammy wrote:Hunch it is, but notice i'm not suspicious of those who put a vote on a "potentially scummy player"; i'm suspicious of you for placing a vote on a lurker. Much as i seem to be in the minority, i think that's a poor reason for a vote.Clammy, you used the word "smells" twice. I assume this is your way of saying that you are working from a hunch. It's as good a place as any to start, but to imply that anyone putting a vote on a potentially scummy player is himself scummy is a bit of an over reaction, in my opinion. I mean, the guy is at only at L-3.
Interesting that you've decided to boil down all of our possible actions on Day 1 to these two possibilities.Yosarian 2 wrote:Anyway, Quag, right now we're trying to decide if we lynch chenhsi for being a lurkerscum or if we lynch reborn for a scummy-as-hell psudoclaim.
Of course those aren't our only choices. But those are the two people I'm trying to pressure right now.Farkshinsoup wrote:Interesting that you've decided to boil down all of our possible actions on Day 1 to these two possibilities.Yosarian 2 wrote:Anyway, Quag, right now we're trying to decide if we lynch chenhsi for being a lurkerscum or if we lynch reborn for a scummy-as-hell psudoclaim.
If it's alright with you, I'd prefer to cast a slightly wider net than that.
Fos: Yosarian 2
Yeah, that's the problem. A, there's absolutly no good reason for you to claim unnightkillable, since you were under no pressure, had no reason to claim, and the claim only helps the scum if you're telling the truth, and B, it's not unusual for a scum godfather or a SK to be unnightkillable anyway.reborn537 wrote:As far as I'm concerned, it went like this -
I roleclaimed Unnightkillable Townie (or something similar)
Everyone told me to shutup, so I did, and since then I've been watching, and waiting for day 2 basically, when I can bring something a little more interesting to the table.
... Agreed. That's all I need to know. An unNKable townie is a pretty useless role anyway, so even if he was telling the truth, it doesn't hurt the town that much. The potential here to lynch an SK of GF is way too great.Yosarian2 wrote:Yeah, that's the problem. A, there's absolutly no good reason for you to claim unnightkillable, since you were under no pressure, had no reason to claim, and the claim only helps the scum if you're telling the truth, and B, it's not unusual for a scum godfather or a SK to be unnightkillable anyway.reborn537 wrote:As far as I'm concerned, it went like this -
I roleclaimed Unnightkillable Townie (or something similar)
Everyone told me to shutup, so I did, and since then I've been watching, and waiting for day 2 basically, when I can bring something a little more interesting to the table.
It doesn't even matter who is suspicious and who isn't. All that matters is that there's a reasonable chance that reborn is a major antitown power role. Even if we're wrong, whoop-e-whoop, we lose a townie.chenhsi wrote:Alright...
if I really had to guess, which I really dislike doing, because I am so gullible, and believe it when people say they are innocent
I find reborn suspicious, because his roleclaim is just terrible...
I also am curious to know why clammy said that he felt that ClockworkRuse was a liar...
Other than that, I really don't find anyone suspicious...
Okay. Here are a list of roles that are NK immune:Farkshinsoup wrote:reborn, if you get put at L-1, then you can talk about your role, until then, please don't.
Quagmire, your calling for reborn's lynch seems a little premature. How exactly have you come to the conclusion that "there's a reasonable chance that reborn is a major antitown power role"?