Yup. Just using intuition meansOkay, good point. Guess I just kinda get used to going by my gut and I forget that not everyone thinks like that.
This seems like a pretty BS reason to vote and following right into what Rofl was implying: "gee, gotta lynch strife or armix, lets pick one!" I would say scum would appreciate this opportunity and act quite like Vamp did.Vamparific wrote:i find armlx scummier for trying to take control of the game
vote:armlx
THANK you. Someone understands my logic here, even if you didn't quote it. Also, I only see two claims...am I missing something? I claimed to be a regular townie...I don't think that really counts as claiming, lol. As for my wagon, I still think that was way too quick and a bit weak. I said one thing that could be taken badly, and then explained my reasoning for it in a later post after I suddenly end up with 5 votes on me. I'm surprised no one has addressed that at all. Please, tell me what your new thoughts are given my explanation. Will you keep your vote on me, take it off, spontaneously combust? (scum, please choose the third option). I think it'd be rather helpful to know.
I'll say that this post by Vamp looks enough like opportunistic scum behaviour to warrant Unvote, Vote: Vamparific. Forbidden's post Was scummy so I have no problem with her wagon. Just think Vamp is better.
But before your claim, they didn't know if you had a power role or not. Also, there are two scum factions in this setup (SK and mafia), so actually, scum wouldn'tforbiddanlight wrote:Um...that's...pretty ridiculous. The scum know who they aren't. They already know I'm a townie, no matter what I said.
And if you did, and were later forced to claim truthfully, people would later come back to this claim as a reason to doubt your future claim. Here's a thought; If you have a power role you want to keep hidden,forbiddanlight wrote:And plus, I could be lying about being a townie, and could have a role I'd rather keep hidden. I don't, but it's a possibility.
You weren't even at half the votes needed for a lynch. It would take some really dumb play from a lot of people for you to go from 4 votes to 9 without a chance to post in between, so your claim came far too early.forbiddanlight wrote:There's also the fact that since it looks like we had a rather fast wagon on me that possibly could have gone to completion, claiming regular townie at least reassures people they aren't killing an aux.
'Anti-town' isn't the same as 'scummy'. I more or less agree with this statement.forbiddanlight wrote:Really, I don't see stating "I am a vanilla townie" as a tell either way.
You weren't even at half the votes needed for a lynch. It would take some really dumb play from a lot of people for you to go from 4 votes to 9 without a chance to post in between, so your claim came far too early.
). StrangerCoug: can you elaborate what your FoS/HoS means?
What authority in this game do you have to demand me to answer a question. Unless your too busy to read the thread and note that both Korts and myself have current arguments against Armix, you wouldn't be asking this stupidly obvious question.iamausername wrote:Unvote, Vote: Greasy Spot, by the way, which I should have done when I first noted that he failed to answer my question.
I dont' know what game it was, but I was a mason and claimed early on D1 when I (or my mason partner, I forget) came under mild pressure early. Scum ended up killing both of us eventually, but lost their chance to hit anyone of value because of it. Town won fairly easily.strife220 wrote:@Lowell: Is your theory on masons outing themselves D1 new to you? Do you have meta of you saying the same thing in another open game?