Round/Day 2
This post is very strange
Grimmy wrote:My list of suspects consist of those who voted for MAX's lynch. But because max was...well...Max...it is not nearly enough to cast a vote.
both because it doesn't make a lot of sense, and because he's singling out the majority because he doesn't belong to it.
This is also strange
armlx wrote:I'm trying to figure out who would have killed Mr. Blonde in this scenario
Not liking that last Grimmy post, on top of what farside said there the "oh no, 2 dead townies" thing.
First, I'll say that I couldn't find a good reason to pick out Mr Blonde. However I generally disagree with speculation about why someone was killed. I guess you disagree Armix? Why is conversing about why a kill happened pro-town? Don't think scum would make their kill choices to WIFOM the town? Same question to DCorbe, who joined the speculation post 199.
DCorbe wrote:Anyone who would want him killed off on N1 would be someone who he was either A) pushing on or B) refuting regularly
Too much WIFOM in sentences like that to be in anyway useful, in my opinion.
Alvinz wrote:Anyway, since the Max execution (which I completely missed), and after the NK, killing someone not protown, or suspicious could mean that the scum could all be experienced.
This doesn't make any sense to me, but I guess he's not around to explain it.
I find it hilarious that on Armix's D2 'who's scum' list (post 218), he picks Farside and DCorbe as 2 most likely to be town. I know I already addressed this, but that's weird.
Around here (page 9) is where suspicion for Grimmy builds up. The case isn't terrible, but I certainly don't think it's the strongest one that could be made. I'm unsure what to make of this, because there are a number of different contradicting motives for scum here.
This post I don't like
alvinz95 wrote:I'm here.
I don't think its right to judge dcorbe by what he said before. I think looking at what has happened recently is a lot better.
because a) DCorbe wasn't really the topic of interest of the day. I don't see why he would bring this up.
b) It's... wrong. If someone's scum on D2, they were scum on D1. Ignoring previous evidence is just a ridiculous thing to say.
In post 234 Shadowgirl picks out Max as one of her top 3 suspects ... ... ???
Grimmy in post 238 doesn't think this is strange ???
I suppose throwing out suspicion without actually having knowledge of the people you suspect is a scum-tell. I've just never seen this one before.
ShadowGirl wrote:I seem to be forgetting which threads I need to reread and which I've already done so. o_o;
My third would be alvinz then.
Really doesn't sound sincere.
She does it again here after Alvinz has been replaced
ShadowGirl post 280 wrote:alvinz95 wrote:Well, I attempted to get some scumtells, but when going through it, I got nothing. I plan on investigating someone else today.
Anyway, how's that coming along?
These sorts of 'connection' posts I always find interesting:
farside22 wrote:Actually as much as Alvinz didn't help that much reading dcorbe and Armix I feel like there is something there I missed before. As much as Armix beat me up for not keeping my vote on dcorbe I wonder if it wasn't bussing.
unvote:
vote: Armix
Farside, your implication is that Armix seemed to be bussing DCorbe here. Do you think he was faking a bus (i.e. planned on backing off before the lynch went off), or backed off for another reason? What do you think Armix-scum's mindset would have been there.
Post 269, LlamaFluff has replaced in and made a post against Avinyl, my former self. I'd say the case isn't very strong, but Avinyl was a bit of a lurker so I won't OMGUS over that. However the voting trend here is strange. You did a re-read, voted Shadowgirl, and then 2 posts later (no change in content), voted Avinyl. Ironic how one of your main reasons for voting Avinyl was his switch in opinions. Please elaborate a little on why the change of opinions, and whether or not SG is still high enough on your scum-list for you to be content with her lynch (apologies if the answer to this shows up later in the game, which i think it may). *EDITED LATER* Bah, pretty much answered in post 338. Vote goes from Avinyl to SG. Your reason being 'reread' ... again. The first time I can buy a re-read changing your mind enough to switch from SG to Avinyl, but another re-read causing you to switch back? Strange behaviour.
Page 12 is a lot of back and forth between dcorbe and Farside - this time with Farside having a reason to get frustrated.
dcorbe wrote:HOW ON D2 DOES ANALYZING A UNANIMOUS LYNCH ON D1 PROVIDE ANY USEFUL INFORMATION
Sorry dcorbe, the argument went WAY over your head apparently. Not sure if you get her point yet or not.
Most of the argument here is noise
farside22 post 328 wrote:I wouldn't say its useless, but more that right now is not the optimal time to try and draw info from the max wagon. I mean,
its pretty assured both scum were on it,
but so was almost all the town
See bold. Why is he saying it is pretty assured both are on the wagon.
"Pretty assured" = null tell.
I'll post opinions on the argument about analyzing the Max-wagon when I do my dcorbe attack.
End of where I replaced!
Next up: An attack on dcorbe to be continued tomorrow..