Mushroom Kingdom Mafia (Game over!)

[Alabaska J]

RBT, your claim was entirely unnecessary. There was no guarantee you were going to get lynched today. Fail for the town.

unvote, vote: Cream147

Seriously people, get the fuck off the Phoebus wagon. I've already said why it is stupid.

Mod edit:
Visible votecount:
Cream147 (5): sideney, Riceballtail, armlx, farside22, Alabaska J
Rogue Shenanigans (4): goborage, iamausername, somestrangeflea, mr. incrediball
Riceballtail (3): skitzer, Gimbo, TheSweatpantsNinja
Phoebus (3): ashmite84, killa seven, Rogue Shenanigans
FaerieLord (1): Surye
Alabaska J (1): populartajo
killa seven (1): Phoebus

No lynch (1): malthusis

Not voting (5): andersonw, Cream147, FaerieLord, Celebloki, DragonsofSummer

With 24 alive it takes 13 real votes to lynch. Deadline: June 25th. At deadline, it takes 7 real votes to lynch.

[Alabaska J]

unvote, vote: RogueShenanigans

Looking back, I'm still not comfortable with his claim enough to let him live.

[somestrangeflea]

Sigh, another testable claim, though this one is cheaper if he is scum and more expensive if town.

Unvote, Vote Cream

I KNOW, LET'S WAGON AS MANY PEOPLE AS WE CAN TO CLAIM BEFORE DEADLINE HITS, THEN LYNCH WHOEVER WE HAPPEN TO BE ON AT THE TIME.

This is a setup designed to make massclaim ineffective. This is D1 and we've had three fullclaims. This is thus a bad thing.

At this point, whether claims are "testable" or not doesn't matter. It's whether or not they're believable that's important. Also note that all of the claims so far could just as easily be anti-town.

To sum up:
Let's cut the wagon->claim->wagon->claim... crap and make sure we lynch someone.

[somestrangeflea]

Also 8x simulpost.

[Alabaska J]

Even though I wasn't part of the cream votes. Both RBT and Rogue have interesting claims. Since Cream didn't and I don't want to see a no lynch occur.

unvote:
vote: Cream

Good point. Nolynch is horrible, and Rogue's wagon has uber-died looking back, so my vote has no point.

unvote, vote: Cream147

.

[goborage]

I can do an item confirm with RBT right now.

Give RBT poisonous mushroom

Now give it back.

My item is exactly what it sounds like. If anyone uses it they die. I can give it to someone by just calling it a "mushroom".

The problem is I cannot figure out a way to use this item. It clogs up my item slot and if I give it to someone who I think is scum as a "regular mushroom", people will say "Why would you give a scummy-looking player a mushroom? If I straight out call it a poisonous mushroom, no scum would use it.

So I've decided to use it to help un/confirm RBT.

[iamausername]

Sigh, another testable claim, though this one is cheaper if he is scum and more expensive if town.

Unvote, Vote Cream

I KNOW, LET'S WAGON AS MANY PEOPLE AS WE CAN TO CLAIM BEFORE DEADLINE HITS, THEN LYNCH WHOEVER WE HAPPEN TO BE ON AT THE TIME.

This is a setup designed to make massclaim ineffective. This is D1 and we've had three fullclaims. This is thus a bad thing.

At this point, whether claims are "testable" or not doesn't matter. It's whether or not they're believable that's important. Also note that all of the claims so far could just as easily be anti-town.

To sum up:
Let's cut the wagon->claim->wagon->claim... crap and make sure we lynch someone.

This post contains truth, and I am quoting it.

[Riceballtail]

How the heck do you think Yoshi is anti-town? You could be delicious tonight SSF.

[Riceballtail]

After I get the mushroom:

GIVE GOBORAGE 1 POISONOUS MUSHROOM

If it still exists long enough to give it back...

[goborage]

And now we wait for the Mod. If what you're saying is true then I shouldn't get anything back.

Mod: Can we get a vote count?

[Alabaska J]

Ohh the suspense…

[goborage]

Hey while you're here, can you explain why cream is scummy?

[somestrangeflea]

How the heck do you think Yoshi is anti-town? You could be delicious tonight SSF.

Yoshi (Pro-town rolename) -> Vote nullifier (Could be pro- or anti- town)

Yoshi nameclaim could easily be a substitute for, for example, Piranha Plant.

Remember, I'm not saying it's likely, but I'm making sure that everyone knows it's a possibility.

Ohh the suspense…

It's like Speed.
Also, you get bonus points for using genuine ellipsis. Well done.

[Alabaska J]

lolz @ssf: Yeah I take pride in the fact that I hit option+semicolon on my mac instead of hitting the period button three times.

lolz @goborage: Done that a gazillion times along with a few other people in the thread. Opportunistically voted Gimbo, then attempted to refute that case by saying "I always look scummy" and dodged further questions about his play, then continued to ignore the people voting him and denied the existence of evidence for his wagon.

[Surye]

How the heck do you think Yoshi is anti-town? You could be delicious tonight SSF.

Yoshi (Pro-town rolename) -> Vote nullifier (Could be pro- or anti- town)

Yoshi nameclaim could easily be a substitute for, for example, Piranha Plant.

Remember, I'm not saying it's likely, but I'm making sure that everyone knows it's a possibility.

I don't think this would be a bad gambit at all. Or too complex. Seems like scum could take advantage of our preconceptions of mario names to craft a claim that is provable yet missleading.

[Rogue Shenanigans]

Also, you get bonus points for using genuine ellipsis. Well done.

You made me cry.

[goborage]

While I'm waiting for that,

Unvote, Vote: Killa Seven

Of the people on the (bad) Phoebus wagon, I think his vote sounds the most disingenuous.

[Alabaska J]

How the heck do you think Yoshi is anti-town? You could be delicious tonight SSF.

Yoshi (Pro-town rolename) -> Vote nullifier (Could be pro- or anti- town)

Yoshi nameclaim could easily be a substitute for, for example, Piranha Plant.

Remember, I'm not saying it's likely, but I'm making sure that everyone knows it's a possibility.

I don't think this would be a bad gambit at all. Or too complex. Seems like scum could take advantage of our preconceptions of mario names to craft a claim that is provable yet missleading.

This also paired with the fact he claimed without being asked and was not really in danger until he self-voted…looks like he thought up a gambit and really wanted to try it out.

unvote, vote: Riceballtail

[goborage]

Ok well I remember the Gimbo vote and frankly I would have done the same thing. I'm not entirely sure what the rest of your vote refers to. Can anyone refer me to a specific post? 30 page thread FTL.

[goborage]

EBWOP: vote = post

[Lawrencelot]

Give RBT poisonous mushroom

Goborage succesfully lost his poison shroom, but... Riceballtail did not receive it.

[Lawrencelot]

GIVE GOBORAGE 1 POISONOUS MUSHROOM

Transaction failed

.

[somestrangeflea]

Cream and Riceball are on 4, Rogue and Phoebus are on 3, K7 is on 2, FaerieLord, Alabaska and No-Lynch are on 1.

Unvote, Vote: Riceballtail

Now he's on 5.
22 hours 15 minutes till deadline.

[Alabaska J]

prod malthusis

He's still voting nolynch rofl.

[armlx]

I can attempt to give it straight back.

Good call.

RBT is confirmed to have that role. Lynching him today is not optimal.

SSF, you are wrong. If any of these players claimed an unconfirmable claim I would lynch them on the spot. None have. No reason to lynch confirmable townies when there are still other suspects.

So people, lets focus and not just screw up today.