MrBuddyLee: 4 (Gaspar, MichelSableheart, Thesp, Xtoxm/MeMe)
To view the complete table of pairwise results, put this information in this form.
Eh, I probably should have include the first OGML vote. I included the second post in entirety because it showed that you were only revoting to reset your condorcet.Gaspar wrote:Not especially. MBL has a habit of saying weird things to "obfuscate the truth" (as I believe he once put it in the past) when acting (or prentending to act) on information. Plus, my initial vote for OGML (Post 523) was BEFORE that post. If you look at all posts by Gaspar and scroll to 54 and 55, you will see that I unvoted OGML and voted OGML... which would actually be a point in my favor if I were to use the "inattentiveness" defense.
Have you liked his scumhunting so far?Rogueben wrote:I want to see what MBL comes up with in his scumhunting. I think that allowing him to post his suspicions now will only benefit us in the long run.
From this:curiouskarmadog wrote:thesp, so basically because I was in the basement?
?curiouskarmadog wrote:the short answer includes that I think everyone else is more likely to be townie than you, I'm still a little unsettled by you and the basement, and aside from the day you arrived out, you've felt really, really off to me.
I agree with that, which is why I didn't list it as a reason I put you second on my Condorcet. It's just confirming your place there for me. Why the baseless attack here?curiouskarmadog wrote:Because the fact that I am "uptight" about being second on your list doesnt not put me second on the list. the effect has nothing to do with the cause.
Obviously he hasn't been accurate so far. He's also pursued lynches based on not much with strong conviction (see OGML). However, regardless of this and regardless of alignment, hearing what he says before he is lynched can only help in my opinion.Thesp wrote:Have you liked his scumhunting so far?
I'm not exactly sure about MS's claim. It struck me as quite odd at the time. I don't understand how someone can have confusion about having an ability. I don't think it actually makes a difference to his alignment though as I can imagine scum power claiming vanilla with benefits just in case they get tracked.Thesp wrote:What do you think of the assertions Gaspar and I have made re: MichelSableheart's unlikeliness of making up his uncertainty about having a day-ability?
I'm not sure what Rogueben thinks, but I find it a complete null-tell for easily accessible reasons. If anything, it may have been overplayed. I can't remember Gaspar making a point of that, but now that you've said you do, I think I need to take a much harder look at your posts.Thesp wrote:What do you think of the assertions Gaspar and I have made re: MichelSableheart's unlikeliness of making up his uncertainty about having a day-ability?
We're doing that. What do you think of MBL's alignment?Rogueben wrote:Obviously he hasn't been accurate so far. He's also pursued lynches based on not much with strong conviction (see OGML). However, regardless of this and regardless of alignment, hearing what he says before he is lynched can only help in my opinion.Thesp wrote:Have you liked his scumhunting so far?
How is it difficult to imagine someone having confusion about their role? Keep in mind that the issue is whether or not he was able to fake confusion - do double-check that, as I'm not sure what the rest of your last sentence is saying here. (If he's mafia, he has a night ability. His confusion seems genuine about not having a night ability. Look it over.)Rogueben wrote:I'm not exactly sure about MS's claim. It struck me as quite odd at the time. I don't understand how someone can have confusion about having an ability. I don't think it actually makes a difference to his alignment though as I can imagine scum power claiming vanilla with benefits just in case they get tracked.Thesp wrote:What do you think of the assertions Gaspar and I have made re: MichelSableheart's unlikeliness of making up his uncertainty about having a day-ability?
:banghead:destructor wrote:I'm not sure what Rogueben thinks, but I find it a complete null-tell for easily accessible reasons. If anything, it may have been overplayed. I can't remember Gaspar making a point of that, but now that you've said you do, I think I need to take a much harder look at your posts.Thesp wrote:What do you think of the assertions Gaspar and I have made re: MichelSableheart's unlikeliness of making up his uncertainty about having a day-ability?
baseless attacks? Man, I just wanted you to answer a question. There was nothing baseless about the FACT you avoided the question.Thesp wrote:I agree with that, which is why I didn't list it as a reason I put you second on my Condorcet. It's just confirming your place there for me. Why the baseless attack here?curiouskarmadog wrote:Because the fact that I am "uptight" about being second on your list doesnt not put me second on the list. the effect has nothing to do with the cause.
I think at this point he is 70/30 Scum/Town. I'm particularly not liking todays play from him, especially the mass omgus that Gaspar pointed out and the setup speculation comment that you pointed out. That being said there's no rush here, and I would like to get his opinions before we move on.Thesp wrote:We're doing that. What do you think of MBL's alignment?
I do plan on rereading that, probably tomorrow sometime. In the meantime what I find difficult to imagine is someone not knowing whether they have an ability or not. If it was unclear from his role pm whether he had an ability I would have thought that he would have checked with mith to see.Thesp wrote:How is it difficult to imagine someone having confusion about their role? Keep in mind that the issue is whether or not he was able to fake confusion - do double-check that, as I'm not sure what the rest of your last sentence is saying here.
The baseless attack was how you implied that you were second on my condorcetcuriouskarmadog wrote:baseless attacks? Man, I just wanted you to answer a question. There was nothing baseless about the FACT you avoided the question.
curiouskarmadog wrote:Because the fact that I am "uptight" about being second on your list doesnt not put me second on the list. the effect has nothing to do with the cause.
I'm confused - you have nothing against vibes, but you assert vibes are "no reason"? You're also acting as though I hadn't expressed this yesterday anyway - my discomfort with you is nothing new, just reasserted. Yesterday you attempted to dissuade an MBL claim, you throw out a number of suspicions all over the place, you attack Gaspar and Xtoxm (who are way closer to the townie side of things to me), and post very little about the three top lynch candidates yesterday. You can call that "just vibes" if you want, they make me more suspicious of you than the other players.curiouskarmadog wrote:"you felt really really off to me" is really a cop out to the answer and is nothing but, "I have a vibe about you". Wow what an easy answer to fall back on..nothing concrete all personal. I dont have a problem with "vibes", I have a problem with you not saying that when I first asked the question. Are you embarassed that you really have no reason to put me second on your list when you did?
I'm mildly unsettled with the thought of three pro-town players having been in the basement together. I can imagine reasons for it, and it's tantamount to outguessing the mod, so it's nowhere near justification alone for seeing you lynched. When coupled with other troubles I have of you, it's a little bit more reason to think you're scum.curiouskarmadog wrote:Again, you really dont explain how "the way you arrived here" has to do with me being scummy...so there only REAL concrete thing that you have is that I was in the basement
Vollkan said he had one, but didn't mention what it was.CKD wrote:I believe vollkan provided one..
I have already explained this. The fact that it explicitly denied I had night abilities, yet didn't mention day abilities in any way, was what set me thinking about the possibility. I still haven't noticed anything about a day ability, however.RogueBen wrote:I don't understand how someone can have confusion about having an ability. I don't think it actually makes a difference to his alignment though as I can imagine scum power claiming vanilla with benefits just in case they get tracked.
I see that as being entirely reasonable coming from MBL. Hell, I'd probably do the same thing if I felt I had come across as being entirely too obvious -- which is what I had gathered from MBL as is.destructor wrote:And what do you mean by saying MBL obfuscates the truth? You're saying he'd overtly imply that he didn't have a result when he really did?
again, my "reaction" has a.) nothing to do with the placement, it is his lack of explanation that caused the "reaction" and b.) came after the placement...so my reaction has absolutely nothing to do with the placement.Rogueben wrote: Is there anything else (besides the reaction to this placing)?
Gaspar was calling for three people to claim, I didnt think that was necessary or exact protown (I guess you did). I thought that vollkan and/or NN was scum, and didnt see MBL as such. I still dont like X, would you explain why you think he is so town, the only reason I even backed off X yesterday was I took Gaspar's defense of him as a soft claim.Thesp wrote: I'm confused - you have nothing against vibes, but you assert vibes are "no reason"? You're also acting as though I hadn't expressed this yesterday anyway - my discomfort with you is nothing new, just reasserted. Yesterday you attempted to dissuade an MBL claim, you throw out a number of suspicions all over the place, you attack Gaspar and Xtoxm (who are way closer to the townie side of things to me), and post very little about the three top lynch candidates yesterday. You can call that "just vibes" if you want, they make me more suspicious of you than the other players.
there is a reason for it...why else would I be asking for it? I bet if you think real hard, you might figure out why I am asking for it now.MichelSableheart wrote:Fishing? Rolefishing? My post definately wasn't intended as such. I noticed a change in CKD's behaviour (he didn't ask OGML, Niv or Vollkan for their secret words, he did ask MBL for his secret word), and wanted to know if there was a reason for that. I expected to hear a change of opinion regarding secret words, possibly combined with the fact that CKD wasn't there when Niv claimed, and didn't log in after Vollkan claimed. I did not regard my question as being role related.
It is pretty obvious why I am asking for it...you are just the one who decided to make the big deal out of it....so a big hand clap to you.MichelSableheart wrote: However, RogueBen's response strikes me as extremely odd: as if he knows that CKD's role has something to do with the secret words. But that is info RogueBen isn't supposed to have, and might imply scumteam. Thoughts, anyone?
someone else mentioned one..it must have been Nab.MichelSableheart wrote:Vollkan said he had one, but didn't mention what it was.CKD wrote:I believe vollkan provided one..