Sykedoc
Pojedinac
Natirasha
dcorbe
In short, I don't understand the reasoning people are wanting to lynch him.dcorbe wrote:If you don't see a case against him please tell us why. Along those same lines, who should we be focusing on and why?Natirasha wrote:So...um...I still don't see the argument against Korts.
Hearing other people's input is sometimes a good idea before starting a wagon. I wanted to see who (if anyone) would jump on blindly and who (if anyone) would genuinely try and build a case.Korts wrote:What would others say to the question of whether I answered everything you wanted me to or not? srsly
This is purely an OMGUSy reaction to my fishing for scum tells. How exactly am I still pushing a wagon when IKorts wrote:For now, my best bet would be you, dcorbe. You still haven't answered to me, whether I have replied to everything you wanted me to. If I have, then I don't understand why you felt the need to ask me to reread page 7 in post 167, because every point I replied to, I only restated after that post. Therefore your pushing of this "observation" that I seemingly haven't/hadn't replied to is just you trying to show me in a bad light. And if I haven't answered yet to your observation, I don't see how it wouldn't be in the town's best interests to provide me a chance to slip up, therefore your lack of restatement of this observation leads me to believe that there isn't, in fact, such an observation.
*headdesk* You *JUST* said it!Korts wrote:Where did I say you were pushing a wagon? I said you were pushing the notion that I was avoiding an answer to you, which is false.
I just reread all your posts from D1 in isolation, and you look town to me at this point. Don't ruin that by getting all uppity when people start trying to pressure you.Korts wrote: For now, my best bet would be you, dcorbe. You still haven't answered to me, whether I have replied to everything you wanted me to. If I have, then I don't understand why you felt the need to ask me to reread page 7 in post 167, because every point I replied to, I only restated after that post.Therefore your ***pushing*** of this "observation"that I seemingly haven't/hadn't replied to is just you trying to show me in a bad light. And if I haven't answered yet to your observation, I don't see how it wouldn't be in the town's best interests to provide me a chance to slip up, therefore your lack of restatement of this observation leads me to believe that there isn't, in fact, such an observation.
You used the word "pushing" which implies "wagon", so you're either trying to subtly plant the idea in the town's head that I'm pushing for no reason or you just don't understand.Korts wrote:"observation"=/=wagon. sorry, no cookie.
Let me ask you again, do you have anything for me to answer, or have I answered whatever you wanted me to?
A Natirasha lynch would be a policy lynch for lack of contributions at this point. I'm not saying we shouldn't look at him, but we should be a little careful about policy lynches since we mis-lynched on D1. Keep in mind we still haven't heard from 2 other people in this game and it's entirely possible that they're scum who are just chilling out waiting for the rest of us to lynch each other.roflcopter wrote:hey that argument was stupid lets all be friends and vote for natirasha together, k?
And I'm sure you can back this claim up?roflcopter wrote:fuck no its not a policy lynch i hate policy lynches.
natirasha looks legitimately scummy please read his posts and see for yourself.
The general theme of that statement seems to be "lynch for lack of useful content" which is a classic policy lynch no matter how you dress it up.roflcopter wrote: i also just read nat's posts in isolation, and what do you know, all he did yesterday was worthless self voting, banter about that, omgus voting dbe, and then sidling onto the lowell wagon with, again, an omgus vote.
You were pretty much convinced about Lowell during D1 and how did that turn out?roflcopter wrote: more votes for lowell are necessary
The game is running slow because there's 2 people not participating and 2 people who refuse to post.DarlaBlueEyes wrote:I am not trying to lay low, My net's been out and I got 7 games that need catching up in, this one is lower on the list, especially since its so slow.