mini #585 - A Tempest Has Formed (Over), Thanks Patrick!!

populartajo · Post Post #650 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:57 am

Does Skruff always plays like that? I mean, catching every little tiny detail?

Evilgorrilaz · Post Post #651 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:15 pm

Skruffs wrote: The impetus of both you and evilgorillaz seems to be to get MM to claim, and that's about all. Why?

I want him lynched, and it only seems logical that he should claim.

Skruffs · Post Post #652 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:10 pm

Elias_the_thief wrote:
Skruffs wrote:
Elias_the_thief wrote:One that I like. This one has a combination of good reasoning and good potential for info gathering if MM is forced to respond and claim. This squabbling is detracting from the fact that MM has done some scummy stuff and needs to be held accountable.
The impetus of both you and evilgorillaz seems to be to get MM to claim, and that's about all. Why?
It is more efficient to focus on one major suspicion at a time, in my experience, and MM is my current top suspect. I'm not COMPLETELY focused on the claim though. I've also mentioned how I would like a response in general. I can't really speak for EG, or why you're making such a big deal of my attack, I feel its pretty well reasoned. Why have you been trying to detract from the wagon over the last couple pages, and why are you unhappy that people want a claim?

I'm neutral about people wanting a claim.

I'm more interested in why getting a claim (and not, say,s cum hunting) is your prime objective at this time.

Gaspode · Post Post #653 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:06 pm

Whoa! Finally things have happened! Now this is actually a mafia game.

Unfortunately, I've done nothing since my last post other than skim the thread for words like "claim" and "lynch", so I don't really know what's going on, but good job getting something to happen, guys!

I have my last paper of the term due in the next 24 hours or so, then I'll hopefully catch up and give my input.

[/finally interested]

Patrick · Post Post #654 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:00 am

Votecount

Alvinz95 (1) -- Gaspode
Mellowed Man (5) -- Elias_the_thief, Cream147, alvinz95, Evilgorrilaz, iamausername
CoheedCambria09 (1) -- Marmalade
Evilgorrilaz (1) -- Skruffs
Elias_the_thief (2) -- CoheedCambria09, Mellowed Man

Not voting: Matt_S, populartajo
12 alive, 7 to lynch

Mellowed Man has been prodded.

populartajo · Post Post #655 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:45 am

Gaspode wrote:Whoa! Finally things have happened! Now this is actually a mafia game.

Unvote. Vote : Gaspode.

Okthxbai.

Cream147 · Post Post #656 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:21 am

populartajo wrote:
Gaspode wrote:Whoa! Finally things have happened! Now this is actually a mafia game.

Unvote. Vote : Gaspode.

Okthxbai.

Now you're the one unvoting with no vote to unvote!

Matt_S · Post Post #657 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 8:13 am

populartajo wrote:
Gaspode wrote:Whoa! Finally things have happened! Now this is actually a mafia game.

Unvote. Vote : Gaspode.

Okthxbai.

I have a few ideas for why you did that, but just to make sure we're on the same page, could you explain? I think it has something to do with the fact that he's commenting on progress that he didn't contribute to.

Cream147 · Post Post #658 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:20 am

Matt_S wrote:
populartajo wrote:
Gaspode wrote:Whoa! Finally things have happened! Now this is actually a mafia game.

Unvote. Vote : Gaspode.

Okthxbai.
I have a few ideas for why you did that, but just to make sure we're on the same page, could you explain? I think it has something to do with the fact that he's commenting on progress that he didn't contribute to.

Whether or not what you said is what popular meant, I think you make a good point Matt. People who are sitting back and watching things happen are annoying me. People who are making arguments, and making things happen (you and Skruffs for example), even if I don't agree with their arguments, at least they are actually participating in scumhunting, which is more than gaspode can say.

Cream147 · Post Post #659 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:21 am

(P.S. I don't think any of that has a strong connection to scumminess however, only a connection to uselessness)

CoheedCambria09 · Post Post #660 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:34 am

Sorry for not posting alot folks, Final exams are coming up and I'm studying. Also I need night time to do what I do best.

populartajo · Post Post #661 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:18 am

Matt_S wrote:
populartajo wrote:
Gaspode wrote:Whoa! Finally things have happened! Now this is actually a mafia game.

Unvote. Vote : Gaspode.

Okthxbai.
I have a few ideas for why you did that, but just to make sure we're on the same page, could you explain? I think it has something to do with the fact that he's commenting on progress that he didn't contribute to.

653 is full of scumtells. Choose one. GO.

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #662 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:19 am

Skruffs wrote: I'm neutral about people wanting a claim.

I'm more interested in why getting a claim (and not, say,s cum hunting) is your prime objective at this time.

How is interest in getting a claim from someone you suspect not part of scum hunting exactly?

Evilgorrilaz · Post Post #663 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:37 pm

Gone until sunday, SAT's

Mellowed Man · Post Post #664 (ISO) » Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:05 pm

Um. I feel no reason to claim, as I don't think there's really a case on me, unless you all claim that voting and unvoting people while pondering is deemed a serious scumtell.

I strongly suspect Populartajo right now, for his vote on Gaspode. He seems to want to avoid voting me.

Cream147 · Post Post #665 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:04 am

Refusal to claim isn't going to get you anywhere Mellowed. Why do you never supply reasons with your votes? That

is

scummy.

iamausername · Post Post #666 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:04 am

Mellowed Man wrote:He seems to want to avoid voting me.

Unless you're saying he's your scum partner, how is this scummy?
Why are you voting for Elias?

populartajo · Post Post #667 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:11 am

Mellowed Man wrote:Um. I feel no reason to claim, as I don't think there's really a case on me, unless you all claim that voting and unvoting people while pondering is deemed a serious scumtell.

I strongly suspect Populartajo right now, for his vote on Gaspode. He seems to want to avoid voting me.

I've seen this before.

Unvote. Vote : Mellowed Man.

If he's scum Gaspode is pretty much his partner.

Cream147 · Post Post #668 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:27 am

L-1. It's not the right time to hammer yet. Let's give Mellowed Man one more chance to actually claim. If he refuses again, then I think we should lynch him. Agree or disagree?

populartajo · Post Post #669 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:28 am

I think Gaspode should come here and hammer him.
@MM, claim.

Skruffs · Post Post #670 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:25 am

populartajo:
stop trying to orchestrate a quicklynch and answer this:
Where did you see that before?

iamausername · Post Post #671 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:31 am

Skruffs wrote:quicklynch

TWO MONTHS! TWENTY SEVEN PAGES!

alvinz95 · Post Post #672 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:02 am

Cream147 wrote:L-1. It's not the right time to hammer yet. Let's give Mellowed Man one more chance to actually claim. If he refuses again, then I think we should lynch him. Agree or disagree?

Agree.

CoheedCambria09 · Post Post #673 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:26 am

Agree

populartajo · Post Post #674 (ISO) » Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:52 am

Skruffs wrote:populartajo:
stop trying to orchestrate a quicklynch and answer this:
Where did you see that before?

You should ask other people in the wagon why are they still voting for Mellowed Man and not trying to blame me for your "quicklynch".
And the "Ive seen this before" was an ironic phrase. Why does MM have the necessity to explain his "I strongly suspect populartajo", yet keeping his vote in Elias, if all his recent votes have been almost reasonless?