It also anagrams to "A Hangers Genius No"Crazy wrote:Vote: Rogue Shenanigans
Using the anagram argument brought out earlier, Rogue Shenanigans is an anagram of "age groan sunshine," and sunshine can make you age, and aging can make you groan.
And groaning is pessimistic and won't help the town.
You presented it as "the scum" with a 33% chance of "the list". In no way did you talk about any member as individual.armlx wrote:Not at all what I meant, but nice try to get out of this. I meant at least 1 of those 3 is scum, more likely 2, and very possibly all 3 (though I'll admit that would be pretty sick if it was).
The list was serious because I tried to find out if the list was serious, which made the list serious.armlx wrote:You kept trying to get an assertion of if my list was serious or not when it clearly was.
We were messing around with anagrams... I didnt think anyone could mistake that for logic...armlx wrote: To be blunt, their random votes sounded like they were trying to force logic behind them, which is unnecessary and over justifying.
I agree with this.armlx wrote:As for 3 scum, 90%+ of minis have a 3 man scum group. Possibly an SK, but thats all to be figured out after N1.
How did you get towntells on everyone else?armlx wrote:Town tells on everyone else save Voodoo and Skitzer.
Some of these "town tells" came to people with less than three posts...armlx wrote: As for town tells, its more subtle phrasing and knowing peoples tendencies then anything else..
Most players try to put a little comedy reasons into thier random votes to make that stage more fun... im new to this site,,, but it seems to be the norm. From dice rolls to judging avatars.armlx wrote:Natural comedy is expected. Forced comedy is offputting.
It was pretty clearcut appeal to emotion, though I didn't use that term, its a logical fallacie and came out at the weakest of attacks.lulu muumuu wrote: when someone is going to try so hard to shine a light on me and get me lynched out of the game for absolutely no good reason, you better expect me to reinforce that i'm town. why would you expect anything else?
Illogical attack= "Crappy random vote is scummy if it comes with a slice of pie" argument by armlxlulu muumuu wrote:you're referring to me?Rogue Shenanigans wrote:The logical defence is to break apart the illogical attack.lulu muumuu wrote:i have no logical defense because it's not a logical attack.
Which I think was pretty easy.
Everyone gives a little comment when random voting... you just went after lulu, crazy and I because we were a bit more flashy.armlx wrote:Scum have to weigh whether they want to vote their partners or not in their random votes. Town don't.Crazy wrote: So tell me, why would scum be more likely to put arbitrary reasons on a random vote than town?
Wow,armlx wrote:Again, I've stated this. I felt your silly reasons were more trying to find a reason to vote that person then silly logic determining who you vote. You were trying to fit your choice into a model, not visa versa, which implies you made a deliberate choice before random voting which is pretty scummy in a game with day start.
Since this is my only game on this site that I have not replaced on, I can't cite any sources. I am sure I have at some point though. And with enough looking around it can be seen in other threads that are over by now.armlx wrote:Have you ever been scum in a game before? If yes, have you ever random voted a scum partner?Rogue Shenanigans wrote:I plainly disagree.armlx wrote:No, but scum definitely avoid random voting certain people.
54) Misrepresentation. I said that the theme suggests it. I did not state it as fact.Lord Gurgi wrote: Post 54: Rogue Shenanigans (12) - Criticises the list. Says there are no power roles.Does he know or is it pure speculation?
Post 64: Rogue Shenanigans (17) - Says he has never started a game before by way of defense.How does that retionalise it?
Post 83: Rogue Shenanigans (23) - Criticises Armlx logic, on the basis that feelings are not a good reason.Feelings is ALL we have.FoS: Rogue Shenanigans
Post 97: Rogue Shenanigans (29) -Voting: Armlxas a response to 'bad attacks'.I don't like this vote, I would like to know your stance on Lulu Muumuu, Rogue Shenanigans.
Post 112: Rogue Shenanigans (31) - Plays the newbie card.This is really suspicious.
Stupid Townies:
1. Rogue Shenanigans
*facepalm*lulu muumuu wrote:crazy wrote:I'd like to hear Lulu Muumu's response to your attack before I vote her.
it sounds to me like you've already made up your mind here. did you really expect me to say something that was going to change your mind? honestly, why bother? are you trying to act merciful? if you really believe i'm scum, why wait?
54) The fact that I used the word "suggests" makes that painfully clear.Lord Gurgi wrote: @Rogue Shenanigans:
-Post 54. That is why I asked if you know or if it is speculation.
-Post 64. I thought that Armlx's case was that you were over rationalising your votes, then when you said that you may have gone over the top for that reason, I thought that was a defense against Armlx's case. If you could clarify that would be helpful.
-Post 83. All we have day 1 is gut feelings about people's behaviour. And logic is independent to a person and is ultimately a feeling, at least in my opinion.
-Post 97. I am curious why you didn't vote for him before.
-Post 112. You have a point here, my apologies, that is misrepresentation.
I just didn't see the point of lynching someone when we still had a little while of mandatory time to burn.ChannelDelibird wrote:
Rogue unvoting 'because L-2 is uncool' is strange. If you think she's scum, that's a good place to be. It looks to me like scum trying to ease the pressure on a partner.FoS: Rogue
From what I understand the town will have time to pick food anyway, and that lynching early would be a waste of discussion time. The people picking food was the minimum time limit for me, not the reason.Crazy wrote: I don't like how you changed your reasoning from "time for the town to pick food" to "time for the town to talk." They're similar, I suppose, but it's not exactly the same thing.
I had already voted for lulu... I had only unvoted for reasons that I have already stated. After everyone had took thier food, and time would not be wated, there was nothing else to talk about. Lulu was going to be lynched anyway in my opinion. Now the town can talk about anything they would have talked about on day one before we would have lynched lulu. But now we have more information on players and foods.Lord Gurgi wrote:@Rogue Shenanigans: Err.... Okay..? It doesn't seem like a reason for a three word hammer.
Her crazy defences and appeals to emotion were more than good reason.DarlaBlueEyes wrote:right so let me ask you something here LG, you guys on the LuLu bandwagon pretty much rushlynched her with no REAL cause, if you look back there was nothing to truly illicit a lynch at that point and there was no deadline that I am aware of.
