Open 65 - Mini Love (Over!) before 578

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #575 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:39 pm

scummy as hell ^^^

Vote: dahill

armlx · Post Post #576 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:40 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:scummy as hell ^^^

Vote: dahill

Agree, though again this seems like a scenario I don't want to touch with a 10 foot pole until necessary.

kravhen · Post Post #577 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:44 pm

dahill1 wrote:i'm a little confused as to why the mafia wouldn't kill the doc?

To be honest, I'd rather not start a discussion on that. WIFOM reasons.

dahill1 · Post Post #578 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:50 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:scummy as hell ^^^

Vote: dahill

how is that scummy? i was speculating on why they wouldn't kill the doc, which is the town's only confirmed, not scum power role

armlx · Post Post #579 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:52 pm

Speculating on NK's like that is just WIFOM.

kravhen · Post Post #580 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:15 pm

dahill1 wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:scummy as hell ^^^

Vote: dahill
how is that scummy? i was speculating on why they wouldn't kill the doc, which is the town's only confirmed, not scum power role

Why do YOU think the scum didn't kill ABR if he was the doc?
Since you feel comfortable asking others, I wanna hear your own answer just for the lulz.

dahill1 · Post Post #581 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:18 pm

kravhen wrote:
dahill1 wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:scummy as hell ^^^

Vote: dahill
how is that scummy? i was speculating on why they wouldn't kill the doc, which is the town's only confirmed, not scum power role
Why do YOU think the scum didn't kill ABR if he was the doc?
Since you feel comfortable asking others, I wanna hear your own answer just for the lulz.

honestly, i have no freakin idea. i now realize how this argument generates into WIFOM so i won't argue about it any further, but i still don't see how it's necessarily scummy

armlx · Post Post #582 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:25 pm

Generating WIFOM is scummy. Thats the point.

kravhen · Post Post #583 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:40 pm

Is speculating on doc protects as scummy?
ABR how did you miraculously choose the right person to protect? Perhaps if you shared the tells you picked up that guided you to believe the scum would target Farside for some reason, we can trace it back to the scum somehow?

Unless your pick was half-random. If that's the case, then nvm and let's move on.

farside22 · Post Post #584 (ISO) » Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:54 pm

kravhen wrote:Is speculating on doc protects as scummy?
ABR how did you miraculously choose the right person to protect? Perhaps if you shared the tells you picked up that guided you to believe the scum would target Farside for some reason, we can trace it back to the scum somehow?

Unless your pick was half-random. If that's the case, then nvm and let's move on.

I know I didn't make the pic, but I will go with the fact that I was targeted day one for killing and someone in this game just doesn't want me around.

Yeah, yeah WIFOM but I thought it would be funny to say.
I'm still for testing the lovers, but I'm sure once again I will be ignored

Sethaniel · Post Post #585 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:50 am

Unless ABR and/or farside are mafia.

farside22 · Post Post #586 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:21 am

Sethaniel wrote:Unless ABR and/or farside are mafia.

Abr claimed doc. Try again.

Vote: Sethaniel

kravhen · Post Post #587 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:07 am

farside22 wrote:
Sethaniel wrote:Unless ABR and/or farside are mafia.
Abr claimed doc. Try again.

Vote: Sethaniel

Claim does not equal 100% truth, although I personally believe ABR 99% as of now.
Seth did not deserve a vote... feels a bit OMGUS to me. I mean, if ABR was mafia, he could've just not killed last night to strengthen his doc claim.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the speed with which you bounced on Sethaniel like this is rather intriguing.

farside22 · Post Post #588 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:13 am

kravhen wrote:
farside22 wrote:
Sethaniel wrote:Unless ABR and/or farside are mafia.
Abr claimed doc. Try again.

Vote: Sethaniel
Claim does not equal 100% truth, although I personally believe ABR 99% as of now.
Seth did not deserve a vote... feels a bit OMGUS to me. I mean, if ABR was mafia, he could've just not killed last night to strengthen his doc claim.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the speed with which you bounced on Sethaniel like this is rather intriguing.

Someone trying to make the doc looks scummy = scum to me

kravhen · Post Post #589 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:46 am

farside22 wrote:
kravhen wrote:
farside22 wrote:
Sethaniel wrote:Unless ABR and/or farside are mafia.
Abr claimed doc. Try again.

Vote: Sethaniel
Claim does not equal 100% truth, although I personally believe ABR 99% as of now.
Seth did not deserve a vote... feels a bit OMGUS to me. I mean, if ABR was mafia, he could've just not killed last night to strengthen his doc claim.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the speed with which you bounced on Sethaniel like this is rather intriguing.
Someone trying to make the doc looks scummy = scum to me

....
Anyone else got the impression I was trying to make the doc look scummy..?
I'm pretty sure my intention was trying to make you look scummy =/

farside22 · Post Post #590 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 5:49 am

I was saying sethaniel was scummy for his comment because he is trying to make the doc look scummy and might I add WIFOM.

kravhen · Post Post #591 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 6:03 am

Oh.
My bad.
I blame waking up too early today. Im starting to see scum everywhere or something.

eldarad · Post Post #592 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 6:10 am

I guess the only thing we need to know before we 100% clear ABR is to ask the 'real' doc to claim now.

In the absence of a claim, we can confirm ABR.
Even if this generates a fake claim, then we get a guaranteed scum in a 1 for 1 trade, rather than the 1 for 3 trade when we lynch a lover.

kravhen · Post Post #593 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:05 am

eldarad wrote:I guess the only thing we need to know before we 100% clear ABR is to ask the 'real' doc to claim now.

In the absence of a claim, we can confirm ABR.
Even if this generates a fake claim, then we get a guaranteed scum in a 1 for 1 trade, rather than the 1 for 3 trade when we lynch a lover.

I'm not sure another doc claim is necessary at the moment... ABR is 99% certainly a doc, we got a successful protection last night, things are going smoothly doc-wise, IMO

eldarad · Post Post #594 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:32 am

Right...although if someone does claim, then we have a scum for certain. (Either ABR or the claimer). A 1 for 1 trade - doc for goon - is absolutely a good trade for town.
Furthermore, if the treacherous lover attempts to claim doc then the townie lover can step in.

If someone doesn't claim, then ABR is 100% confirmed doc.
It's a win-win situation, and completely defeats the WIFOM that the scum may have been trying to set up by not killing.

There is no reason for the real doc (if ABR is lying) to stay silent.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #595 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:47 am

Guys. I lied about being a doctor. I'm just a vanilla townie.

I know who the real doctor is.

dahill1 · Post Post #596 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:22 am

*sigh*

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #597 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:25 am

Yes, that's right. I'm the scum. Lynch me on the spot.

...

We good, now ? Everyone believe me ?

armlx · Post Post #598 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:25 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:Guys. I lied about being a doctor. I'm just a vanilla townie.

I know who the real doctor is.

This made me lol.

silence · Post Post #599 (ISO) » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:33 am

Argh. Why did the real doctor not claim earlier? (Now he probably shouldn't)

How does ABR claim to 'know' the real doctor?

Do we have any reason not to lynch ABR immediately?