Post History And Beyond:
First post is Post Number 67:
dcorbe wrote:Sorry for the delay in posting guys. I confirmed my role PM and then completely forgot about the game.
I owe you a read, MTF...
Okay, good excuse...kind of. Still semi-lurking, though in an understandable fashion.
Second post is Post Number 69:
dcorbe wrote:Vote Mokina wanna cyber?
Despite the fact that there is some actual action at this point, he totally random votes for someone with a vote already sitting on them. Forgivable in itself, but when lined up with other posts...
Third Post isn't until 119:
dcorbe wrote:The signal:noise ratio in here is still a little bit high. It seems like nobody is really giving any compelling reasons to hold their votes the way they are and the ones on the defensive are doing a pretty poor job of defending themselves.
All I have to say right now is this:
It seems like some of the people pushing the eldritch wagon right now are the ones who lurk the most right now.
It really sounds like a scum-driven wagon to me.
So.. based on that..
FoS: Eldritch Lord
because I'd like to hear more of what you have to say first
FoS: Daria and ZombieSlayer
Unvote
This is as close to reasoning as he gets, he bashes others for lurking and calls it a scum-driven wagon, but he himself has not posted in 60 posts. Behold the FoS on the EL "scum-driven" wagon, which might justify a future vote but also FoS' the leaders of the wagon to make sure his arse is covered either way.
Two posts later:
dcorbe wrote:It really looks like you're trying to deflect attention off onto your aggressors with this post.
Unvote (just because I screwed up my tags with the last post and I want to make my intentions clear)
Vote: Snix
He goes in an entirely different direction only 2 posts later, either he is on very sporadically, or realized his mistake in the post 2 above this one and had to abandon his lurking to change it. Furthermore, this is an existing bandwagon and he offers little to no reasoning beyond "It looks like you're defending yourself while scumhunting." <--Read: Possible straw-man, waiting for his justification.
dcorbe wrote:I would seriously slow down with calling anyone else here emotional. Nobody likes to be called ignorant or have their judgement called into question constantly. That itself is a knee-jerk response.
Pointless meta ad-hom, ignoring. Next couple posts are the same.
dcorbe wrote:Seriously, wouldn't it have been easier for you to say "everyone is alive?"
She was clarifying...strange that you would find yourself able to make a comment on this and not what was actually going on in the game since your last scumhunter post before that took place quite a while before this one. Perhaps you had nothing to add, this is nothing extremely remarkable.
dcorbe wrote:We can always put your theory on a Mokina/EL scum alliance to the test. We can lynch EL today (since his bandwagon is already being pushed, he's the logical choice).
We've got a 1/12 chance of being correct but whether we are correct or not, it would be a very educational experience.
If he turns out to be scummy, we can build a strong case to push a Mokina wagon tomorrow.
If he turns out to be a townie, the Mokina gets a pass, and we can begin examining some of the relationships around both of them.
Discussion?
Hm...I don't think I need to say anything about this post except that he is setting up a Mokina lynch for the next day, kind of like what TSN noticed with DBE.
But here comes the cover-up:
dcorbe wrote:Please note I'm NOT advocating that we rush towards a Lynch. I would like to see how others react to this idea, and keep the conversation going.
It, like the other cover-up post earlier in his history, comes almost immediately after his first post as though he realized he committed some huge slip. Not a case in and of itself, but a big point in the graph.
dcorbe wrote:If you do come up townie when you get lynched, it won't be in vein. It will provide us valuable information to go on for the next round of scum hunting because you've interacted with just about everyone here.
If you come up scummy, all of a sudden those pushing your wagon look extremely clean.
Don't take it personally that you're being lynched on day 1.
Certainty, the kind I shared that I would be lynched. He is still setting up the next mislynch with the "if you come up townie, we can get those other people" as though he had not contributed to my wagon.
dcorbe wrote:I hope you're right and he's scum because with this statement (at least in my mind) you've completely tied yourself to his fate. You seem to be pushing his wagon awfully hard. You're going to look EXTREMELY scummy if he turns up town.
Anyone agree with that assessment of the situation? Or am I off base here.
-Daniel
TSN answered this and justified most of my reasoning for the vote.
dcorbe wrote:I probably used the wrong words to express the fact that I was trying to get Darla to be a little more careful about proceeding with the lynch, even though I jumped on the wagon and left him at L-1 for a little while. I can see how that action can be perceived as scummy but it really wasn't my intention.
I'm going to back off my vote now (and look even scummier)
Unvote
Take it as you will,, but if I have to take heat for this exchange, so be it.
Backing off in such a manner almost makes it seem as though he's anticipating the scum-points he's about to earn. That still does not make the scumminess of this point disappear, it exists and the attempt to deflect it by anticipating it is pretty obvious in my eyes.
That is my case against Dcorbe. I am too lazy to proof-read it at the moment, so please deal with grammatical errors when quoting me if you happen to find them.