Thestatusquo wrote:Shaft.ed are you actually not interested in my proposed title for you? I thought it was quite clever.
Clever, but am I really that tricky and manipulative to be a demagogue?
dictionary.com wrote:a person, esp. an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people.
Thestatusquo wrote:Shaft.ed are you actually not interested in my proposed title for you? I thought it was quite clever.
Clever, but am I really that tricky and manipulative to be a demagogue?
dictionary.com wrote:a person, esp. an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and
prejudices of the people.
Thestatusquo wrote:Shaft.ed are you actually not interested in my proposed title for you? I thought it was quite clever.
Clever, but am I really that tricky and manipulative to be a demagogue?
dictionary.com wrote:a person, esp. an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and
prejudices of the people.
Oh how they quibble.
I swear I'm not evil
:beardscratch:
<.<
:cat stroking:
>.>
Erg0 posted with the wrong account in a game I'm in
no joke
.
He speaks the truth.
In case anyone cares, the Green Crayons reference is explained here. Personally I'd prefer "Eats Crayons" if we're going down that track, since it at least contains a joke (sort of).
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
cicero wrote:by the way, you could work in Shaft.ed's signature period by making it dem.ogogue
The period would make it more "interesting" yes. I've already told you guys I'll take whatever makes the threshold. But it's sad the Wanker McStickytitties was instant success, while the serious considerations aren't going over as well. Maybe its just not time.
cicero wrote:by the way, you could work in Shaft.ed's signature period by making it dem.ogogue
The period would make it more "interesting" yes. I've already told you guys I'll take whatever makes the threshold. But it's sad the Wanker McStickytitties was instant success, while the serious considerations aren't going over as well. Maybe its just not time.
Of course it is time. What people don't realise is that if Shea and I agree on something, it mathematically must be the right thing to do.
cicero wrote:by the way, you could work in Shaft.ed's signature period by making it dem.ogogue
The period would make it more "interesting" yes. I've already told you guys I'll take whatever makes the threshold. But it's sad the Wanker McStickytitties was instant success, while the serious considerations aren't going over as well. Maybe its just not time.
Of course it is time. What people don't realise is that if Shea and I agree on something, it mathematically must be the right thing to do.
Cicero and I combined are a force to be reckoned with.