Mature Mafia: Game Over

[Glork]

Post cleaner.

Tags and double posts.

Minor FoS

[Phoebus]

Oh?

[Talitha]

Seems that we could fix up our own posts, if we needed to.

[Phoebus]

Haha.
OK.

Kill me?

[Talitha]

No. You have to stay here and suffer. Besides, your happiness is intertwined with your outlook on life.

Will it make you feel better if I set a deadline?

[Macros]

yes, the death post alterer would be most happy with a deadline.

[Talitha]

I was just about to post

Deadline: 7 days from this post

when I did a double take.

"death post alterer"? Explain why we have a death post alterer?

[Phoebus]

My outlook is pretty bleak at the moment...

[mathcam]

Unvote: raj, vote: Phoebus.

Cam

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

hey cam

what made you think this was a vanilla only setup in terms of our( non moderator actions?

Thanks-
Pooks

[rajrhcpfreak]

i should be back with full access by next sunday.

i wouldn't be disappointed in a pheobus lynch. but i still prefer the camwagon

[Glork]

Why the fatalism, Phoebus?

[Phoebus]

Because this ... was a mistake.
And I'm not interested in leaving a replacement with the burden of my monkey...if you can find one.

[Phoebus]

Also, as I see it - if this is not some weird social experiment and actually has a point, my lynch could gain info. Also it would end my misery.
Else, it would end my misery and I could point and laugh at you all - stuck in this box...waiting for... who knows what.

Either way... WIN!

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

BAH

[mathcam]

hey cam

what made you think this was a vanilla only setup in terms of our( non moderator actions?

Thanks-
Pooks

I don't remember saying I did. I

did

make some assumptions about roles which turned out to be incorrect, but that wasn't one of them.

Cam

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

you wote:


On a related note, I'm very suspicious of Glork, raj, and DGB for pushing for a claim. In my role PM, there is a very clearly delineated difference between my alignment and my role. There's no doubt that I will claim pro-town as my alignment, and given that my role is presumably independent of my alignment, I'm not sure what there is to gain from that either. Not only is it therefore bad play to claim (unnecessarily giving away information), it's also scummy to push for a claim. It's also possible that the scum role/alignment structure is set up differently, and thus that scum didn't know how worthless it would be to push for a claim. Raj is the scummiest of those three, so he gets my vote.



It seems to imply that there would be no information gleened from the alignment section of your role pm, which could only be true if all alignment PMs were the same and thus offered no information, which could only be true if you assumed this was a vanilla only setup.

[Macros]

@ Tall, I assumed iot was to give the game flavour, hence my excitement when the game started, I assumed (obviously quite wrongly) this was an oppourtunity for me to delight the masses with witty death scenes, my early foray to test the waters showed clearly everyone was not clued in to the idea (that I thought was immeadiately obvious) that despite the mature title, this game would be a delightful trip down a twisted nostalgia lane, chock full of old jokes, and random bullshit. But no, I was filled with disgust at the serious tone in pretty much everyones post, I was then forced to play dumb for fear of a pogrom on my fine self for editing the post (which is my job).

[mathcam]

It seems to imply that there would be no information gleened from the alignment section of your role pm, which could only be true if all alignment PMs were the same and thus offered no information, which could only be true if you assumed this was a vanilla only setup.

To me (and I think most people), "vanilla only" is a reference to roles, not alignments. I do suspect that all alignment PMs are essentially the same -- they all either say you're pro-town or scum (possibly with a distinction between mafia and an SK).

I mean this much less snarky than it comes off, but is this your first split alignment/motive game?

Cam

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

So you think it was possible the alignment pm said something like "You're a cop"?

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

and no this is not my first split game, and I'm not certain this is a split game.

[rajrhcpfreak]

It's also possible that the scum role/alignment structure is set up differently, and thus that scum didn't know how worthless it would be to push for a claim. Raj is the scummiest of those three, so he gets my vote.

that could also been said with a townie. i know nothing because i have no mod ablities or anyother power. so i took it that claiming would work the same as a normal game. and would help the town.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

i didnt write that

[mathcam]

So you think it was possible the alignment pm said something like "You're a cop"?

There's some confusion somewhere. I specifically said

I do suspect that all alignment PMs are essentially the same -- they all either say you're pro-town or scum (possibly with a distinction between mafia and an SK).

Being or not being a cop was not one of those options, and nor would such a statement belong in the alignment part of the PM. That's role information.

Cam

[Axelrod]

yes, the death post alterer would be most happy with a deadline.

Wait, wut? Did I miss something?

Did you edit zu_Faul's post?

Why?

I'm confused.