First of all, please note that my condorcet list at the time was as follows:Gaspar wrote:The first half of Post 237 and Sable's response in Post 243 are interesting -- somewhat parallel to MBL's interrogation of Nabs. Sable states that most of his points against Xtox aren't indicative of Xtox being scum; they are just examples of anti-town behavior.
Sable incorrectly states that Xtox is atop his list to help ensure a condorcet winner. The vote count at the top of the same page lists Niv as the condorcet winner. For somebody who is big on everybody understanding condorcet, this is somewhat alarming to me, especially with Niv having died as scum. In the first CT game (which I know Sable read), we looked for ways to subtlely manipulate condorcet to get what we wanted. He did explain that the vote was there as a slap on the wrist, but that seems slightly silly when he's allegedly so damned keen on making sure we have a condorcet winner. I'd like to see a thorough explanation of Sable's thought processes throughout this exchange (read over all of Page 10, Sable) before deciding how exactly I feel about this.
At that point in time, Niv was at the top of my condorcet, to guarantee a condorcet winner. Your comment that Xtoxm was at the top of my condorcet at the time even though Niv was condorcet winner is incorrect.MichelSableheart, [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1008780#1008780]post #211[/url] wrote:Niv, Xtoxm, Rogueben, MrBuddyLee, FaerieLord, Thesp, BBMars, SensFan, Machiavellian-Mafia, Gaspar, vollkan, NabakovNabakov, PookyTheMagicalBear, {curiouskarmadog, Gorrad, IH, Nibbler Twins, OhGodMyLife, Sarcastro}, Mr. Grey, No Lynch, MichelSableheart
I was
The first was my gut reaction to Xtoxm's behaviour. On first sight, his posts looked rather scummy. Only when I really thought things through did I start to realize that he was likely town being attacked. That feeling started to form when I posted my list, but wasn't solid enough at the time to warrant placing Xtoxm lower. Because I didn't update my list before post #243, Xtoxm was still in second place as a result of gut reaction.
The second reason for placing Xtoxm second on my list was that it made the condorcet much clearer. Niv beat Xtoxm heavily, and Xtoxm beat everyone but Niv. If I lowered Xtoxm, Niv would still beat him, but the differences between Xtoxm and the other players would become smaller. It made it more likely that Xtoxm would start to tie with other people, being beaten by one or two players who in turn were beaten by other players, creating an extremely large smith set if Niv should ever drop on the condorcet.
Before I placed MM on top of my list, MM beat FaerieLord 8 votes to 2. Even if I had just voted FL, it is extremely unlikely he would have become the condorcet winner. Simultaneously, the smith set was MM and Niv. In that situation, guaranteeing a condorcet lynch on someone I did have suspicions on was far more important then trying to get a deadline lynch on the ideal lynch candidate.Gaspar wrote:Michel: Consider the end of D1, where you voted for Fae but put Mach above on your condorcet lynch. If you had just voted for Fae, somebody else could have jumped to him, tipping the scales in favor of Fae and resulting in an outright scumlynch D1. It's obvious that "ensuring a condorcet lynch on somebody" was your motive, but why are you the one so willing to give in to lynch somebody whom you don't suspect as much? Wouldn't the more protown thing to be "try harder to convince everyone to lynch whom you believe is scummy"?
What is so bad about that quote?MrBuddyLee wrote:Shit, this is bad too. Really bad. The amazing thing is, I don't think I've ever seen Gaspar protect a scumpartner this WIFOM blatantly, so I doubt he and Sableheart are aligned. There are enough things to point out at this point that it doesn't make sense for me to wait much longer on what I've spotted, but I'd like others to take a look at Gaspar/Sableheart please before I let my arrows fly.MichelSableheart wrote:Scape indeed seems to be a scumgroup, but I don't think there are any kills that can be attributed to them yet. FaerieLord, Flameaxe and Pooky all got the same description (murdered), so are likely to be made by the same killer. It's possible that the dead of Nibbler Twins can be attributed to them, though.