Orca? This! is! Dance of the Title Fairy!

Claus · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 3:22 pm

Why does Yosarian2 need a change of title again?

I find "(shrug)" to be quite cool and appropriate.

Tamuz · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 3:51 pm

Nominate Claus for Dirty Santa btw.

Period Thread.

pickemgenius · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 3:53 pm

it should be noted I said something completely awesome in this thread last night, so much so that Thok himself was ashamed of its truth, and therefore deleted all the posts related to that subject.

it should also be noted there was nothing profane in any of the comments made by either party, and that Thok himself walked right into my response, and I'm ashamed he can't man-up and just accept what he typed and just leave it. It should be noted that Thok made a very innuendoish post in response to OMANS [removed - mith]? post. He opened himself up for it with his post.

that is all

p.s. Yos' title doesnt need to be changed. seriously...

ISO · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 4:46 pm

Claus wrote:Why does Yosarian2 need a change of title again?

I find "(shrug)" to be quite cool and appropriate.

Thok · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:13 pm

pickemgenius wrote:it should be noted I said something completely awesome in this thread last night, so much so that Thok himself was ashamed of its truth, and therefore deleted all the posts related to that subject.

I don't know who removed the posts from last night, but I know for certain it wasn't me. I'm sure the relevant party will back me up on this.

(Among other things, my innuendoish posts was deleted. I'm pretty sure I went to sleep fairly soon after my post [which was at 1 in the morning West Coast time], and never even saw whatever PEG considered to be a clever response. I'm fairly clear all PEG did was miss the point of my post in the first place.)

pickemgenius · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:20 pm

Thok wrote: I'm fairly clear all PEG did was miss the point of my post in the first place.)

If I missed the point then why did you feel the need to delete the posts, instead of taking your chance to make me look like a complete asshole?

ShadowLurker · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:21 pm

Thok, why did you just edit your post to change your story?

Thok · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:22 pm

So, PEG's demonstrated a complete inability to read. Great.

Thok · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:25 pm

ShadowLurker wrote:Thok, why did you just edit your post to change your story?

My story didn't actually change, except to add the fact that I was asleep when PEG put up his post.

pickemgenius · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:25 pm

Thok wrote:So, PEG's demonstrated a complete inability to read. Great.

Who else would delete the posts...

They weren't harming anyone or volatile in nature...

pickemgenius · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:26 pm

Thok wrote:
ShadowLurker wrote:Thok, why did you just edit your post to change your story?
My story didn't actually change, except to add the fact that I was asleep when PEG put up his post.

We all saw it.

Thok · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:28 pm

pickemgenius wrote:
Thok wrote:So, PEG's demonstrated a complete inability to read. Great.
Who else would delete the posts...

They weren't harming anyone or volatile in nature...

I assume it's either Mith or Stoofer, and they erased the posts for containing a high level of profanity and offensiveness. I'm sure the relevant person will admit to it if it is an issue.

Claus · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:44 pm

Tamuz wrote:Nominate Claus for Dirty Santa btw.

Period Thread.

Heh, is that why Santa's clothes are red?

shaft.ed · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 5:48 pm

Claus wrote:
Tamuz wrote:Nominate Claus for Dirty Santa btw.

Period Thread.
Heh, is that why Santa's clothes are red?

second

ISO · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 9:05 pm

For future reference, if someone posts something, and it gets deleted by me or anyone else, and you know it was deleted,

don't repost the content that was deleted

.

MichelSableheart · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 10:26 pm

shaft.ed wrote:What about
I agree with myself

Then

I agree with Yosarian too

seems better to me. But his current title is perfectly fine too, of course.

Nemesis · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Fri May 16, 2008 11:38 pm

mith wrote:For future reference, if someone posts something, and it gets deleted by me or anyone else, and you know it was deleted,
don't repost the content that was deleted
.

Nominate Mith for "[Removed - Mith]"...

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Sat May 17, 2008 1:52 am

I'd like to nominate someone for the title "Orca" - but who?

cicero · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Sat May 17, 2008 2:07 am

MichelSableheart wrote:
shaft.ed wrote:What about
I agree with myself
Then
I agree with Yosarian too
seems better to me. But his current title is perfectly fine too, of course.

This one is actually really great.

ISO · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Sat May 17, 2008 2:08 am

I like shrug the best, but thats the best of the "...agree" line of thought yet suggested.

PokerFace · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Sat May 17, 2008 7:01 am

Nemesis wrote:
mith wrote:For future reference, if someone posts something, and it gets deleted by me or anyone else, and you know it was deleted,
don't repost the content that was deleted
.
Nominate Mith for "[Removed - Mith]"...

Dammit, Nemesis I wanted to make that joke!

Also I think Yosarian's current title is fine since he can always put the following links in his sig.
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/images/6/67/Agree-yos.gif
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/images/1/ ... ee-yos.gif

Tamuz · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Sat May 17, 2008 9:00 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:I'd like to nominate someone for the title "Orca" - but who?

...but whom. Please don't kill that beloved part of the English language.

And I think Porochaz should get it because I can't distinguish between him and Oman and Oman posts a lot of whales

Cogito Ergo Scum · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Sat May 17, 2008 9:01 am

Nominate PokerAce for THERE IS NO F IN POKERFACE

Tamuz · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Sat May 17, 2008 9:02 am

Have Stoofer or Thok made any laws about titles that fail coming back full circle. Because they should.

PokerFace · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Sat May 17, 2008 9:12 am

Cogito Ergo Scum wrote:Nominate PokerAce for THERE IS NO F IN POKERFACE

lol. No thanks though