Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

Tamuz · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 8:16 am

cd your posts don't make sense.

If WM? is scum and got motivated but didn't use the second kill how is it that he would have known to reveal double.

If roff is scum and WM? is real then how did WM? get double results

The only possibility is that they are both scum and this is a ballsy as hell gambit.

scotmany12 · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 8:45 am

Ok, so I still have problems with both of them. Just seems off to me. But say they are telling the truth, we do not know if whome? is sane or not. So I'm hesitant to vote for cd.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 9:28 am

Tamuz wrote:cd your posts don't make sense.

If WM? is scum and got motivated but didn't use the second kill how is it that he would have known to reveal double.

If roff is scum and WM? is real then how did WM? get double results

The only possibility is that they are both scum and this is a ballsy as hell gambit.

That's my argument. Most of the possibilities are confusing, giving way to the the more possible possibility that both are scum. I can make some sense with the other ones, but I don't necesarily have to agree or support them.

As for the WM? scum motivation thing. We're assuming that Whome? is scum.

Whome? wrote:Then I got told that I had lots of energy and felt the urge to investigate again.

It's scum telling us that he got an extra night action. And that's how scum knew to reveal double.

roffman · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 9:44 am

Tamuz wrote:cd your posts don't make sense.

If WM? is scum and got motivated but didn't use the second kill how is it that he would have known to reveal double.

If roff is scum and WM? is real then how did WM? get double results

The only possibility is that they are both scum and this is a ballsy as hell gambit.

or we both could be telling the truth

Tamuz · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 9:58 am

duh. theres a reason I didn't write that one.

Scott. I know I'm innocent, so to me that clears up the sanity issue to me.

Can someone refresh me on WM?'s other investigation? He should have 3, right?

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 11:02 am

Jdodge. Whome? got an innocent on him.

scotmany12 · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 11:59 am

Tamuz wrote:Scott. I know I'm innocent, so to me that clears up the sanity issue to me.

It doesn't for the rest of us

Tamuz · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 12:34 pm

I know scott, I've said that before.

Tamuz · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 12:34 pm

Speaking of Jdodge, I haven't heard from him or Coron for a while.

WhoMe? · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 7:19 pm

cop sanitys

sane - inv's can be trusted, GF, millers are screwy
naive - all innocent
paranoid - all guilty
insane - guilty on town, innocent on scum

Given I have had innocents and a guilty, I am either sane or insane, and have found either 1 scum or too. Shame we don't have a confirmed townie for me to check myself on.

Tamuz · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 9:34 pm

Motivated investigation could be insane, although chances are Erg0 would have seen and figured that out his investigations. I think we are safe to think he had 2 like investigation and the two like investigations weren't scum.

WhoMe? · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Mon May 12, 2008 9:48 pm

Tamuz wrote:Motivated investigation could be insane, although chances are Erg0 would have seen and figured that out his investigations. I think we are safe to think he had 2 like investigation and the two like investigations weren't scum.

I think I see your point but want to be sure

If Erg had gotten a guilty, we would have expected him to push for a lynch on that person, whether by claiming or just making a case. He didn't, so ergo (heh) he got innocent results. Which means either the motivated inv is OK, or erg's second target actually was scum.

Which puts us into WIFOM territory, especially as we do not know who Erg targeted.

Coron · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 2:02 am

Hm, I agree that it looks like both whome? and Tamuz are likely both town, but as others had mentioned Tamuz could possibly be scum motivator trying to clear himself, or whome? could really be any scumz with a power role of any kind to get motivated.

Sorry about not being around much recently, was at a funeral then mother's day, I'm sure you know how it is...

Tamuz · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 7:05 am

If I'm the motivator whats up with rofflesmans

scotmany12 · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 8:30 am

Tamuz isn't a motivator...scum or town. I'm also not buying into this whole scum motivator thing. If roffman is scum, then I believe whome? is also. I'm torn between believe them and not...for if we mess up game is probably over.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 9:14 am

WhoMe? wrote:
Tamuz wrote:Motivated investigation could be insane, although chances are Erg0 would have seen and figured that out his investigations. I think we are safe to think he had 2 like investigation and the two like investigations weren't scum.
I think I see your point but want to be sure

If Erg had gotten a guilty, we would have expected him to push for a lynch on that person, whether by claiming or just making a case. He didn't, so ergo (heh) he got innocent results. Which means either the motivated inv is OK, or erg's second target actually was scum.

Which puts us into WIFOM territory, especially as we do not know who Erg targeted.

Why are you misleading us again? Ergo had pushed for dahill with a case.

WhoMe? · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 9:32 am

been back for a reread, and yes I was wrong. Erg pushed for dahill, and dahill came up town.

Where does that leave us?

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 11:15 am

WhoMe? wrote:been back for a reread, and yes I was wrong. Erg pushed for dahill, and dahill came up town.

Where does that leave us?

Somewhere between you're scum misleading us or you're just careless town. The forward more likely.

roffman · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 3:51 pm

can someone please point me to where dahill is said to be town. I either did a misread, or missed something cause all i can see is role reveal later

scotmany12 · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 4:05 pm

Go look on page 1, and watch the video

roffman · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Tue May 13, 2008 4:59 pm

ok, thanks for that

WhoMe? · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Wed May 14, 2008 12:43 am

chaotic_diablo wrote:
WhoMe? wrote:been back for a reread, and yes I was wrong. Erg pushed for dahill, and dahill came up town.

Where does that leave us?
Somewhere between you're scum misleading us or you're just careless town. The forward more likely.

Not quite what I meant. I meant where does that leave us regarding the accuracy of my guilty on you.

My inv was either affected by the motivate or not.

If not then I am sane or insane and either you, OR JDodge & Tamul are scum

If my inv was affected then naive goes back on the list as a possibility and my role is effectively useless.

So how to go forward from here?

JDodge · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Wed May 14, 2008 12:46 am

the most obvobv answer is lynching c_d at the moment. And since we only have a day to make a decision,

vote: chaotic_diablo

.

roffman · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Wed May 14, 2008 2:03 am

vote:chaotic_diablo

like Jdodge said, we only have a day left.

WhoMe? · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Wed May 14, 2008 2:06 am

was that the hammer?