muffinhead wrote:Xdaamno wrote:muffinhead wrote:Xdaamno wrote:muffinhead wrote:What exactly am I doing that you think is scummy? Don't be wishy-washy. If I can then disprove what you find scummy about me, are you going to back off or keep blundering on for the sake of your own pride?
X do u think that just becuase u were at lynch 1 and now have no votes on u currently means that we have all forgotten about u ad no longer sus?
Look back at the whole of page 19 and ealier part of page 20 and tell me there is nothing sus about it. sure u did explain yourself but u changed and revoted sd 3 TIMES in 1 and half pages. So dont call me wishy washy when u done that urself. Thats why u got my vote in the first place, ur desperatly to lynch,then sarcasim.
To do that many sus things of course i have to be aware of the fact u could be scum. I dont forget that none of this happened unlike rishi has.
This is annoying. I asked for a direct answer to that question, because you claim to have one. I didn't ask for your views on whether I was being hypocritical. The information is all rather jumbled at the moment, and since you apparently have such a clear idea why I'm scum I'd like a summary of your reasons.
~ Xdaamno, still awaiting a reply.
If thats not answering ur question then i dont know what is. U asked the question of what have u done thats so scummy to me? That post above is the answer. I really dont know how its jumbled.
No i dont recall saying i have a clear idea ur scum after u explained urself so plz state where i said that. What else do i have to say.
Right, I read that wrong, but I'm still looking for more. In theory, what
about
that was scummy? Sure, I was confused, but I have don't have a clue how you equate that to scuminess. Furthermore, what I said then came AFTER your claim of my certain scuminess iirc.
And my
main
point here is that's incredibly weak reasoning. EVERYONE leaves scum tells at some point, regardless of alignment, and SD has done so much more than I have. Like I said, there's no way OMGUS dosen't come into this.
Of course everyone leaves scumtells i wont deny that but as i have ALREADY said it the amount of scumtells u leave. Lets have a look at them.
A-voting people on poor reasoning eg farside
B-Qucikly voting then unvoting then voting again eg with sd
C-trying to lycnh a clamied doc which is way to risky on day 1
D-Sarcasm to try defend urself
E- Not contributing enough information to finding scum
No longer
F-Not explaining himself
No longer
Now u know y i was convinced u were scum
Now the sritkeouts are the orginal reasons i voted u and because u have explained urself in e and f im no longer loking at u for day 1 lynch.
However I still have 4 differnent scumtells from u which is way more then others and god knows y i havnt got a vote on u. Also i dont have any major leads off others.
Well sd looks incrdibly scummy and i can guarrentie he will not make it into the endgame, however on day 1 im not going to risk lynching him when he can be very usefull if he is town.
Surely that answers all ur questions.
mod prod farside once again
I'm honestly not sure why you can't see so many more tells in SD's post, and I'm going to attribute the fact you haven't given any valid tells whatsoever to your newbishness here; and I hate to say that, ftr.
A: Voting people on poor reasoning is
not
a scum tell, unless you live in a perfect world; and furthermore, this so-called 'tell' is a matter of opinion. My reasoning was strongly theoretical and was based on what scum would psychologically do, which is better than some of the bullcrap meta-tells in mafiascum today, like the ones you've given.
B: You obviously haven't thought this through at all. Can you please explain how a player not being sure on who to vote in
any way
positively correlates with the chance of being scum? Though not.
C: Firstly, I'd like to note that a doctor is not an incredibly important power role; certainly not game-breaking. The main attribute is his confirmability. Therefore, the only risk of lynching him Day 1 is because he has an automatically elevated chance of being town, correct? Now, that is pretty much a multiplication on whatever chance I think he has of being scum; don't get me wrong, if I thought another player was being as scummy and didn't claim doc I'd lynch them ASAP. But the fact of the matter is, for me,
with the doc claim included
, SD_Reaper is still very much below all players on the chance of being town; therefore it's literally craplogic to suggest the doctor claim pardons him when I've taken that into account, kapeesh?
D: Sarcasm to try and defend myself? You do realise sarcasm is a trait of someone playing
more relaxed
? Sarcasm is almost certainly a town tell in my books. Whether it's rude or not is debateable, but you've fallen into one of the large pitfalls of scum tells: how rude a player is does not correlate to their chance of being scum. Furthermore, I wasn't even being rude on purpose, which is the only possible way that could be a tell. So it's either a town tell or a null tell. Take your pick. The crossed-out E and F reasons just make you look like you aren't sure of your own case, which I knew already.
If you want to defend those tells I'm expecting some THEORETICAL reasoning as to why they make me scum; not just the fact they're abnormal.
If you can't reply to why atleast two of the points I've mentioned are a valid theoretical scum tell, you're literally being a dumbass for still, after all this time, playing off OMGUS, picking an easy target, and being a sheep
to society ¬.¬
.
