Realistic Mafia - Game Over

armlx · Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2008 12:55 pm

Also, only armor to confirmeds IMO. If random non-confirmed get armor, well, its harder to take down mafia with armor too.

Surye · Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2008 12:57 pm

armlx wrote:Also, only armor to confirmeds IMO. If random non-confirmed get armor, well, its harder to take down mafia with armor too.

I've never seen a bullet proof vest that could stop a lynching

armlx · Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2008 12:59 pm

I've seen ones that can prolong a rampage, and I'm giving the mafia enough credit to be able to head shot as well as / better than cops.

Crub · Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2008 1:36 pm

armlx wrote:If anyone else leaves while Natashira is gone, we kill them when they return no questions asked. Head shots too.

Obviously I also left when Natashira left to get body armour in order to observe his actions. Hence me knowing about "2 bombs".

Personally I think Awesome is probably scum, not convinced about Natashira though.

Also you don't think being able to blind possible witnesses is something to be worried about?

Natirasha · Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2008 2:08 pm

I'm willing to blind a witness if it lets me blind a possible assailant and therefore saving my life/the witness's life.

armlx · Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2008 2:32 pm

Hmm, don't want to lynch Crub. Natirasha didn't die while away, which would be an easy target IMO and he could come back with flashbangs, armor, guns, etc.

Hjallti · Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2008 7:11 pm

I agree we shouldn't discuss 'can cops be scum' all the time, but unless somehow proven otherwise we can not risk to call cops confirmed town. It still seems the lists posted so far are trying to imply this.

armlx · Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Thu May 08, 2008 7:17 pm

Hjallti wrote:I agree we shouldn't discuss 'can cops be scum' all the time, but unless somehow proven otherwise we can not risk to call cops confirmed town. It still seems the lists posted so far are trying to imply this.

Why is this man still alive? "We can't discuss it, but they could be"?

Natirasha · Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Fri May 09, 2008 10:47 am

Hjallti wrote:I agree we shouldn't discuss 'can cops be scum' all the time, but unless somehow proven otherwise we can not risk to call cops confirmed town. It still seems the lists posted so far are trying to imply this.

Contradiction...

Surye · Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Fri May 09, 2008 11:01 am

I'd be ready to try the dayvig on hammer approach. How close are we to a majority on Hjallti?

Unvote Vote: Hjallti

I don't like people who just come out of the lurk and parrot what has been said a thousand times. Any idea what the current score on him is?

Celebloki · Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Fri May 09, 2008 2:35 pm

I think Its 4 on him, Me, Surye, Armlx, Natarisha thats based on the last VC by Kscope with him at none then the 4 of us voting him over the last 3-4 pages.

armlx · Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Fri May 09, 2008 6:16 pm

I'm very content with the fact 4 confirmeds are voting him.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 9:36 am

Vote Count #9

Hjallti (4): armlx, Natirasha, Celebloki, Surye

Surye (1): DrippingGoofBall

Not Voting (9): Sensfan, Awesome Pants, Panzerjager, Ghostwriter, NabakovNabakov, Crub, Sykedoc, Singing Librarian, Hjallti

Prodding the not-voters.

SensFan · Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 10:01 am

Yeah, I'm here.

I think a

Vote: Hjallti

is justified, since he seems to be trying to focus attention on the 'Cops', while saying that he thinks they are almost confirmed.

PJ. · Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 11:21 am

Vote:Surye

armlx · Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 11:31 am

Panzerjager wrote:
Vote:Surye

Are you real?

Awesome Pants · Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 12:29 pm

Mod

: How many to lynch?

I'd vote Hjallti too, but I think that'd put him at L-1 which would let him or someone else hammer so that we wouldn't see his alignment.

SensFan · Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 12:31 pm

(4+1+9)/2=15/2=7.5=8 to lynch.

He currently has 5 votes.

SensFan · Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 12:32 pm

Wow.

9+4+1 is only 14, isn't it. In that case, its 7 to lynch.

Awesome Pants · Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 12:46 pm

Ok, I won't bring him up to L-1 in that case. If we're considering lynching/killing him, I think it might be worth getting kinky and tying him up so that he can't try anything. That'll give him time to respond too.

Surye · Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 1:39 pm

SensFan wrote:Wow.

9+4+1 is only 14, isn't it. In that case, its 7 to lynch.

No, still 8, 7 is not a majority.

SensFan · Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 1:40 pm

Ugh, damnit.

I was right the first time, for the wrong reasons. 14/2=7, 8 to lynch.

Thanks Surye.

GhostWriter · Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 6:05 pm

I've been prodded. I'm here, but I'm haveing to play a hell of a game of catch-up. Read my sig to see why.

armlx · Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Sat May 10, 2008 7:43 pm

Hjallti, claim and/or die plz.

NabakovNabakov · Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Sun May 11, 2008 6:30 am

Sorry guys, I have a hard time getting into flashbang discussions.

I would not be adverse to Hjallti dying, but I think it's gotten past the point where I have the power to do anything pro or con anymore.

Confirmedness is a crutch and not a guarantee. This would be a pretty wacked out setup if we could just play process of elmination with 5(?) investigations per-night.