Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

WhoMe? · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Sun May 04, 2008 4:30 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]

Vote: Roffman

Claim[/quote]

I have a reasonable theory as to what

roffman's

role is. I'm thinking you should claim, so that we can direct the search elsewhere.

Also. isn't anyone going to take credit for my extra investigation last night?

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Sun May 04, 2008 4:56 am

I'll claim if people want it, but it will only add another layer of confusion IMO.

WhoMe? · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Sun May 04, 2008 5:23 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]I'll claim if people want it, but it will only add another layer of confusion IMO.[/quote]

Sorry, bad sentence construction. I was agreeing that roffman should probably claim.

Tamuz · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Sun May 04, 2008 10:59 pm

Are we playing?

Coron · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 1:59 am

It seems that roffman should probably claim.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 11:23 am

We're waiting on roffman's claim.

pickemgenius · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 1:14 pm

PRODDED PEOPLE VOTECOUNT

Roffamn-chaotic_diablo,KaleiÐoscøpe
chaotic_diablo-roffman

NOT VOTING: Coron, Jdodge,scotmany12,Tamuz,WhoMe?

8 ALIVE 5 TO LYNCH

DEADLINE MAY 15th

scotmany12 · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 1:37 pm

Hi, roffman needs to claim.

roffman · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 6:07 pm

fine, i'm a motivator

JDodge · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 6:22 pm

targets

roffman · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 8:06 pm

ergo and whome

JDodge · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 9:01 pm

i find it awfully convenient that you just HAPPENED to target the two different claimed cops and just HAPPENED to target erg0 on the night before he died

WhoMe? · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 10:25 pm

roffman wrote:
vote kaleidoscop
i'm around 90% certain that ergo isn't scum.

This was the 1st soft claimy type post from roffman. I was wondering if he was hinting at cop, which got my interest for obvious reasons

roffman wrote:@scot: my vote kscope was more or less meaningless, i just wanted to vote someone. As for ergo being town, i'm not 100% sure, but i'm relatively certain that he does not have a nightkill ability, therefore i'm pretty sure he is not scum.

This post had me thinking he was a tracker. I thought he had seen Erg0 action someone, then that person survived the night and there was a NK of a different party. This made me happier with him than when I thought he was hinting cop.

His first two posts of today were interesting.

roffman wrote:personally, i'm more doubtful that there are 2 cops in this setup. We know Ergo was cop, but WhoMe? has only claimed it. That, and the fact a claimed cop survived the night makes me very suspicious

roffman wrote:i understand your reasoning, though i think we should wait for all of WhoMe?'s supposed results before we start the accusation train

Erg0 had just turned up dead and we know he was a cop. This has given roffman some misgivings. I find the wording on the second post interesting. Instead of saying wait for my result, he put it as wait for ALL of my resultS. This had me thinking he was our mystery motivator, as this post seems to have knowledge that I would have more than one result.

At this point I posted and gave my 2 investigation results. Roffman then immediately voted my guilty result and then posted

roffman wrote:i'm relatively certain that WhoMe?'s two investigations are legitimate, though he could quite easily be insane. Just wondering if it is a night ability, did anyone get motivated N1?

This had me thinking tracker again, as if he was a tracker and had targeted me he would have seen my 2 targets for investigation. He also seemed to be saying he wasn't the motivator here.

We then get

roffman wrote:fine, i'm a motivator

In all honesty I am inclined to believe him. His role as motivator fits all the soft claim statements he made.

If he targeted Erg0 his 90% certainty Erg didn't have a NK comes from there not having been 2 deaths that night.

He seemed to know I would have more than one result to report on today

He became happier about me when I claimed 2 investigations, prior to that he had shown suspicion of my claim based on Erg's role.

So given that I now know why I had 2 cracks of the whip last night

vote chaotic_diablo

JDodge · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 10:37 pm

Basically, motivator fits him because his soft claims indicate tracker to you and he thought erg0 was town which he should have no knowledge of as a motivator?

WhoMe? · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Mon May 05, 2008 10:59 pm

I think motivator fits all his claims.

He didn't say he was sure Erg was town, he said he was sure he didn't have a NK. That would fit with him as a motivator having targeted Erg. There was only one NK that night, so he figured Erg didn't have one.

I agree being relatively sure someone is town based on this is wrong, but it does fit the claim.

Coron · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2008 4:24 am

I might be busy for a while, but I'll try to check in periodically.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2008 8:22 pm

Whome? is quite gullible.

WhoMe? · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2008 8:45 pm

chaotic_diablo wrote:Whome? is quite gullible.

From my pov

FACT: I got an extra investigation last night

We have someone claiming motivator, with no counter claims. I'm not seeing the problem with believing him, especially when this claim fits his previou statements.

Tamuz · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2008 9:59 pm

True.

Why did you choose chaotic to investigate?

Why did you choose me?

WhoMe? · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Tue May 06, 2008 10:17 pm

Tamuz wrote:True.

Why did you choose chaotic to investigate?

Why did you choose me?

I thought your (you and chaotic's) pile on me looked opportunistic.

JDodge · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2008 1:19 am

WhoMe? wrote:I think motivator fits all his claims.

He didn't say he was sure Erg was town, he said he was sure he didn't have a NK. That would fit with him as a motivator having targeted Erg. There was only one NK that night, so he figured Erg didn't have one.

I agree being relatively sure someone is town based on this is wrong, but it does fit the claim.

This answer is not yes or no.

roffman · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2008 2:14 am

what WhoMe? said is pretty much what i deduced. I wasn't sure ergo wasn't scum, but like i said, i was pretty sure he didn't have a NK that night

scotmany12 · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2008 10:29 am

I'm really just having a hard time coming to terms that the town has five power roles. I understand that the motivator can be a double edged sword, but it still just makes me uneasy.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2008 12:04 pm

WhoMe? wrote:
chaotic_diablo wrote:Whome? is quite gullible.
From my pov

FACT: I got an extra investigation last night

We have someone claiming motivator, with no counter claims. I'm not seeing the problem with believing him, especially when this claim fits his previou statements.

FACT: A scum motivator screws with your entire argument.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Wed May 07, 2008 12:09 pm

WhoMe? wrote:
chaotic_diablo wrote:Whome? is quite gullible.
From my pov

FACT: I got an extra investigation last night

We have someone claiming motivator, with no counter claims. I'm not seeing the problem with believing him, especially when this claim fits his previou statements.

FACT: A scum motivator screws with your entire argument.