Does that refer to SD or Metalic?Twig wrote: However, I would not support lynching him at lylo unless we were very sure
Newbie 584: Mark it "done"!
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
muffinhead Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 494
- Joined: March 8, 2008
- Location: the land down under
only 7 minutes after me lolTwiglees wrote:EBWOP: I also seemed to have simulposted muffinhead, as I was doing other things while posting the last post.ShowFor more info about my gaming history and future plans visit my wiki at
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Muffinhead
May run normal game quacks and masons mafia 2 IF I get enough intrest. pm me if your intrested.-
-
muffinhead Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 494
- Joined: March 8, 2008
- Location: the land down under
anyways twiggles if the deadline was made to be today then who would u vote for and why?ShowFor more info about my gaming history and future plans visit my wiki at
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Muffinhead
May run normal game quacks and masons mafia 2 IF I get enough intrest. pm me if your intrested.-
-
MeMe Post or Perish
- Post or Perish
- Post or Perish
- Posts: 10710
- Joined: October 6, 2002
- Location: Missouri
-
-
SD_Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 8, 2008
What the hell iceman, i really think your scum now because you unvoted me again. I already asked you if it was worth voting me even though i claimed.
Remember when i said that, you felt you would still vote me anyways. I an others such as farside already suggested it was a stupid idea to vote for me on day 1, but you insisted. But then ting says its a bad idea and you unvote again. Before you voted me im sure you already weighed your options on whether or not it was a good idea to try and lynch the claimed doc, but now ting says something and you jump off all of a sudden.SD wrote: and your willing to take that risk?
Overall, you justified yourself voting for me and now you unvote when somebody says something thats been said many times before. BANDWAGON..-
-
Metalic Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 22
- Joined: August 11, 2007
- Location: Canada
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
SD_Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 8, 2008
Did you actually read my post?@SD
I am still convinced you're scum, don't think otherwise. I just realized that what Ting said made a lot of sense, and I explained that.
Dude I know you think im scum, but the fact that you unvoted makes you scummy. And just like i said you BANDWAGONED, cuz i asked you if you were willing to vote off the claimed doctor and you said YES. Ting said something i said already, listen this time dude.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
I've been thinking like this: Let's vote off the scummiest person ASAP, no matter whether they're the claimed doc or not. The way Ting put it was: we still can, on a later day, but there's no reason to on day 1. That clicked for me: I am 3 games and none of them have made it to day 2 yet, so I haven't thought in terms of long term yet, since I haven't had the chance to. Additionally, there was no way you were getting to five votes, so there was no reason to have my vote on you. Also, I didn't agree with Met's jumping on the wagon. As soon as it seems plausible I would like to lynch you, but its clearly not happening today.Dude I know you think im scum, but the fact that you unvoted makes you scummy. And just like i said you BANDWAGONED, cuz i asked you if you were willing to vote off the claimed doctor and you said YES. Ting said something i said already, listen this time dude.-
-
SD_Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 8, 2008
@Everyone, does this look a band wagon?
states hes willing to lynch the claimed doctorIceman wrote: I don't think you're actually the doctor, so technically, no, I'm not trying to lynch the claimed doctor. I'm trying to lynch the person who claimed to be doctor who actually isn't.
I make sure he knows and i know that he really is willing to lynch the claimed doc.SD wrote: and your willing to take that risk?
He says hes fine with it.Iceman wrote: What makes me think your claim isn't authentic is the fact that, as Rishi pointed out, it's ALL YOU EVER SAY to defend yourself. It seems like you think that now that you've claimed, it makes no difference how scummy you appear because you know you're immune. I place your claim on an equal level with everything else you do know, because I learned that there's a chance that there's no doctor at all in this game, and the scuminess outweighs the significance of your potentially false claim, in my mind
Ting wrote: @ice.
Assuming we've mislynched twice in a row and are in day 3 lylo, there'll be two scum among only five people. It won't be easy, but it's certainly not impossible to find them. You'll have two days worth of voting patterns and posts to analyze. Even if you just randomly put your vote at day 3, you'll still have coin flip odds of it landing on scum.
Ting says something farside practically stated last page. Meaning ice already knew the risk.
He unvotes although he tried defending himself saying that it was fine to try and lynch me. Why? Because some else said it was a bad idea. Not because it was a bad idea (farside already said it was). But because "another person said it was". BANDWAGON.....Iceman wrote: I guess you're correct when you say "there's nothing to lose in waiting". The only problem is, what if we get to day 3 and we have no idea who the other scum partner is? Even if we're convinced at that stage that SD is scum, we'd still be in a bad spot, not knowing who his partner is. I suppose that's looking too far into the future, since we have no idea how day 2 will play out yet. I'm just completely convinced he's scum. I don't think metalic should jump on this wagon though, without contributing too much, and just rehashing what I said earlier.
unvote for now.
People tell me this does not make perfect sense.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
-
-
muffinhead Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 494
- Joined: March 8, 2008
- Location: the land down under
sd there is a thing called voting. If u r suspecious of someone u vote for them.SD_Reaper wrote:@Everyone, does this look a band wagon?
states hes willing to lynch the claimed doctorIceman wrote: I don't think you're actually the doctor, so technically, no, I'm not trying to lynch the claimed doctor. I'm trying to lynch the person who claimed to be doctor who actually isn't.
I make sure he knows and i know that he really is willing to lynch the claimed doc.SD wrote: and your willing to take that risk?
He says hes fine with it.Iceman wrote: What makes me think your claim isn't authentic is the fact that, as Rishi pointed out, it's ALL YOU EVER SAY to defend yourself. It seems like you think that now that you've claimed, it makes no difference how scummy you appear because you know you're immune. I place your claim on an equal level with everything else you do know, because I learned that there's a chance that there's no doctor at all in this game, and the scuminess outweighs the significance of your potentially false claim, in my mind
Ting wrote: @ice.
Assuming we've mislynched twice in a row and are in day 3 lylo, there'll be two scum among only five people. It won't be easy, but it's certainly not impossible to find them. You'll have two days worth of voting patterns and posts to analyze. Even if you just randomly put your vote at day 3, you'll still have coin flip odds of it landing on scum.
Ting says something farside practically stated last page. Meaning ice already knew the risk.
He unvotes although he tried defending himself saying that it was fine to try and lynch me. Why? Because some else said it was a bad idea. Not because it was a bad idea (farside already said it was). But because "another person said it was". BANDWAGON.....Iceman wrote: I guess you're correct when you say "there's nothing to lose in waiting". The only problem is, what if we get to day 3 and we have no idea who the other scum partner is? Even if we're convinced at that stage that SD is scum, we'd still be in a bad spot, not knowing who his partner is. I suppose that's looking too far into the future, since we have no idea how day 2 will play out yet. I'm just completely convinced he's scum. I don't think metalic should jump on this wagon though, without contributing too much, and just rehashing what I said earlier.
unvote for now.
People tell me this does not make perfect sense.ShowFor more info about my gaming history and future plans visit my wiki at
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Muffinhead
May run normal game quacks and masons mafia 2 IF I get enough intrest. pm me if your intrested.-
-
SD_Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 8, 2008
-
-
Rishi A Meer townie
- A Meer townie
- A Meer townie
- Posts: 3055
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Arlington, VA
Yes. You should vote for someone you find suspicious. If someone doesn't have any votes (or has very few votes), there's no harm in voting. When you wait for someone else to vote a person before you place your vote, you seem opportunistic.SD_Reaper wrote:
or FOS, but then again, do i really need to. Anyone who has been paying attention to this game knows that i suspect iceman of being mafia.Muffin wrote: sd there is a thing called voting. If u r suspecious of someone u vote for them.Taking a break from MS. Please send e-mail if you want to get in touch with me.-
-
Twiglees Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 95
- Joined: March 12, 2008
- Location: Stirling, Scotland
SDicemanE wrote:
Does that refer to SD or Metalic?Twig wrote: However, I would not support lynching him at lylo unless we were very sure
What I meant was if we got to lylo I would not lynch SD if he were alive as the scum could be hunting the cop or realised that they could get a win if they survived through to lylo without an SD NK.-
-
SD_Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 8, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
The thing is, my two top suspects were SD and X. I no longer suspect X, and I still suspect SD, but that's a lynch that won't happen today. Honestly, with my two top suspects down, all I really have now is that nagging suspicion of Rishi. Honestly I can't imagine anyone except for myself or X being lynched today, though I can tell you that lynching me won't get you anywhere.SD_Reaper wrote:It looks like iceman and x were the top mafia suspects until recently. Now they both have practically no votes. So im guessing people think they are inncoent. Where do go from here?
Muffin and ice, who are you possible day 1 lynching candidates?-
-
SD_Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 8, 2008
-
-
SD_Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 8, 2008
-
-
muffinhead Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 494
- Joined: March 8, 2008
- Location: the land down under
My top suspect is u sd however i am not going to risk lynching a claimed doc. So currently my biggest suspecision is X but i cant see him being lynched so we are back on level 1.SD_Reaper wrote:It looks like iceman and x were the top mafia suspects until recently. Now they both have practically no votes. So im guessing people think they are inncoent. Where do go from here?
Muffin and ice, who are you possible day 1 lynching candidates?
Currently i believe that surly at least 1 or both of the scum have stayed in a very quiet group giving no information away. This group includes ting,farside,twiggles and farside. So i could currently lynch any one of those 4 untill one/ any of them speak up.ShowFor more info about my gaming history and future plans visit my wiki at
http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Muffinhead
May run normal game quacks and masons mafia 2 IF I get enough intrest. pm me if your intrested.-
-
farside22 Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Mafia Mum
- Posts: 35785
- Joined: October 24, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
There are 2 farsides?muffinhead wrote:
My top suspect is u sd however i am not going to risk lynching a claimed doc. So currently my biggest suspecision is X but i cant see him being lynched so we are back on level 1.SD_Reaper wrote:It looks like iceman and x were the top mafia suspects until recently. Now they both have practically no votes. So im guessing people think they are inncoent. Where do go from here?
Muffin and ice, who are you possible day 1 lynching candidates?
Currently i believe that surly at least 1 or both of the scum have stayed in a very quiet group giving no information away. This group includes ting,farside,twiggles and farside. So i could currently lynch any one of those 4 untill one/ any of them speak up.
See my sig for details of why I'm quiet/ busy. I'm still up for lynch X. No one yet has made me understand how someone who is up for lynching the doctor is not scummie. I'm not sure about ting or twiggles. I keep thinking about how one sided the votes were on iceman and no one hammered. I would think at a certain point scum would have hammered so either Iceman is scum and the town isn't paying attention or both scum was on his lynch. I think an Iceman lynch or X lynch would tell us something at this point. I'm thinking more Iceman to see were the votes were and come to be and then go from there.
unvote:
vote: IcemanSarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.-
-
Xdaamno I love you
- I love you
- I love you
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: April 10, 2007
- Location: 0, 0, 0
You see, this is why you're so high on my scumdar; you take a lynch so lightly. Putting ourselves in L-1 isn't a good compensation for finding out a little information; sure, if anyone actually thought that person was scummy you'd have more of an argument, but you're lynching people for the sake of it with 'no questions asked'. I mean, if Iceman turned up town (Which IMO he probably would), what information would that give us? I'm assuming you also think he'd probably turn up town, due to the fact there's more town than scum and you haven't given a single argument against him.farside22 wrote:
There are 2 farsides?muffinhead wrote:
My top suspect is u sd however i am not going to risk lynching a claimed doc. So currently my biggest suspecision is X but i cant see him being lynched so we are back on level 1.SD_Reaper wrote:It looks like iceman and x were the top mafia suspects until recently. Now they both have practically no votes. So im guessing people think they are inncoent. Where do go from here?
Muffin and ice, who are you possible day 1 lynching candidates?
Currently i believe that surly at least 1 or both of the scum have stayed in a very quiet group giving no information away. This group includes ting,farside,twiggles and farside. So i could currently lynch any one of those 4 untill one/ any of them speak up.
See my sig for details of why I'm quiet/ busy. I'm still up for lynch X. No one yet has made me understand how someone who is up for lynching the doctor is not scummie. I'm not sure about ting or twiggles. I keep thinking about how one sided the votes were on iceman and no one hammered. I would think at a certain point scum would have hammered so either Iceman is scum and the town isn't paying attention or both scum was on his lynch. I think an Iceman lynch or X lynch would tell us something at this point. I'm thinking more Iceman to see were the votes were and come to be and then go from there.
unvote:
vote: Iceman"This should be an absolute car crash, but let's try it." - CDB
"did you get ces to look disgusted by their offer? i thought that might work" - Patrick
Cracking Idea Mafia-
-
Xdaamno I love you
- I love you
- I love you
- Posts: 3354
- Joined: April 10, 2007
- Location: 0, 0, 0
Please don't dodge the following, as I want to clear this up:muffinhead wrote:
My top suspect is u sd however i am not going to risk lynching a claimed doc. So currently my biggest suspecision is X but i cant see him being lynched so we are back on level 1.SD_Reaper wrote:It looks like iceman and x were the top mafia suspects until recently. Now they both have practically no votes. So im guessing people think they are inncoent. Where do go from here?
Muffin and ice, who are you possible day 1 lynching candidates?
Currently i believe that surly at least 1 or both of the scum have stayed in a very quiet group giving no information away. This group includes ting,farside,twiggles and farside. So i could currently lynch any one of those 4 untill one/ any of them speak up.
Whatexactlyam I doing that you think is scummy? Don't be wishy-washy. If I can then disprove what you find scummy about me, are you going to back off or keep blundering on for the sake of your own pride?"This should be an absolute car crash, but let's try it." - CDB
"did you get ces to look disgusted by their offer? i thought that might work" - Patrick
Cracking Idea Mafia-
-
Rishi A Meer townie
- A Meer townie
- A Meer townie
- Posts: 3055
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Arlington, VA
He's probably basing it off the fact that other people are suspicious of you. It's always safe to follow the herd.Xdaamno wrote:Whatexactlyam I doing that you think is scummy? Don't be wishy-washy. If I can then disprove what you find scummy about me, are you going to back off or keep blundering on for the sake of your own pride?Taking a break from MS. Please send e-mail if you want to get in touch with me.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.