Toaster Strudel wrote:Since when is Zu_Faul a likely scum target?
He's not....
But still you are voting for me. Something doesn't seem right.
I'm voting for you because I don't think that scum would target you, therefore someone did, and I suspect a vig. Plus, you've been likely scum for a while now.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
hasdgfas wrote:I'm voting for you because I don't think that scum would target you, therefore someone did, and I suspect a vig. Plus, you've been likely scum for a while now.
Um. A vig targeting zu_Faul wouldn't make it any more likely that he's scum, so that's a silly reason to vote him.
Now, if you suspected a
godfather
, that would be a good reason.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
hasdgfas wrote:I'm voting for you because I don't think that scum would target you, therefore someone did, and I suspect a vig. Plus, you've been likely scum for a while now.
Um. A vig targeting zu_Faul wouldn't make it any more likely that he's scum, so that's a silly reason to vote him.
Now, if you suspected a
godfather
, that would be a good reason.
that's not the only reason, Xyl, and nowhere did I say that it was.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
Toaster Strudel wrote:Since when is Zu_Faul a likely scum target?
He's not....
But still you are voting for me. Something doesn't seem right.
I'm voting for you because I don't think that scum would target you, therefore someone did, and I suspect a vig. Plus, you've been likely scum for a while now.
Do I have to point out where he contradicts himself, or do you all see this yourselves?
Toaster Strudel wrote:Since when is Zu_Faul a likely scum target?
He's not....
But still you are voting for me. Something doesn't seem right.
I'm voting for you because I don't think that scum would target you, therefore someone did, and I suspect a vig. Plus, you've been likely scum for a while now.
Do I have to point out where he contradicts himself, or do you all see this yourselves?
OMG I think I see it.
"I'm voting for you because I don't think scum would target you" implies that he doesn't think you're scum.
And what is he doing voting for someone he doesn't think is scum? HMMMMM?
I have recently learned, the hard way, in an ongoing game that shall remain nameless, that hasdagas here is most creative with fake claims.
He's liable to produce the kind of claim that will cause most people to conclude: "he couldn't possibly make that one up." Yet, he can. He most certainly can.
[i][url=http://chantalpare.ca]Squeezable icing, flaky pastry crust and sweet, gooey fillings are irresistible.[/url][/i]
[url=http://www.lawrencejoseph.org/1indexh2.html]The Harpits Greatest Pits - Free MP3's[/url]
Toaster Strudel wrote:I have recently learned, the hard way, in an ongoing game that shall remain nameless, that hasdagas here is most creative with fake claims.
He's liable to produce the kind of claim that will cause most people to conclude: "he couldn't possibly make that one up." Yet, he can. He most certainly can.
There's a difference between a claim you don't think he could make up, and a claim with corroborating evidence you don't think he could fake.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net
"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
Xylthixlm wrote:There's a difference between a claim you don't think he could make up, and a claim with corroborating evidence you don't think he could fake.
Day 3, page 95... I might have forgotten something. Did I?
[i][url=http://chantalpare.ca]Squeezable icing, flaky pastry crust and sweet, gooey fillings are irresistible.[/url][/i]
[url=http://www.lawrencejoseph.org/1indexh2.html]The Harpits Greatest Pits - Free MP3's[/url]
Hi! I'm your resident sadist who'll be checking in with some thoughts when I've read through the 95 pages of this game... which I'll start when I get back from seeing Iron Man.
DizzyIzzyB13: For the record, I /ghooked Cogitate :p
ChannelDelibird: Well, for the record, FUCK YOU
ChannelDelibird: ;_;
DizzyIzzyB13: Cogitate is shorter. :(
DizzyIzzyB13: Sorry, CD
ChannelDelibird: Well, at least that's the first time a girl has told me "it's not short enough"
Toaster Strudel wrote:Since when is Zu_Faul a likely scum target?
He's not....
But still you are voting for me. Something doesn't seem right.
I'm voting for you because I don't think that scum would target you, therefore someone did, and I suspect a vig. Plus, you've been likely scum for a while now.
Do I have to point out where he contradicts himself, or do you all see this yourselves?
Damnit. My reading comprhension sucks. I read TS's question as: "Since when is zu_Faul a likely scum?"
I don't really understand e_k's argument. Not that I find hasdafgas' claim too believable with a Doc and a Jailkeeper down. But it seems grasped out of thin air, I don't think this is implied at all.
elvis_knits wrote:
"I'm voting for you because I don't think scum would target you" implies that he doesn't think you're scum.
Please tell me you're not at all serious about this. Seriously,
THINK
about this for a minute. How does that imply that I don't think he's scum? Who would I think scum wouldn't target?
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
