Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

[quote="WhoMe?"][quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]It's still three days left. Just reading along.[/quote]

There's no point me calling on people to be active and register their votes when there's only 10 minutes left is there? Now is as good a time as any for me to communicate that I think a default lynch of anyone is not good.[/quote]I don't think it makes a difference if you state it.

[WhoMe?]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"][quote="WhoMe?"][quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]It's still three days left. Just reading along.[/quote]

There's no point me calling on people to be active and register their votes when there's only 10 minutes left is there? Now is as good a time as any for me to communicate that I think a default lynch of anyone is not good.[/quote]I don't think it makes a difference if you state it.[/quote]

Here's a question for you. You voted for me to "tie the vote". Well the tie is off, and is meaningless anyway as first person to achieve whatever the tie number is gets lynched. So why are you still voting me?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Because:
a. I've not looked for a better lynch target yet
b. Not voting is bad

[WhoMe?]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Because:
a. I've not looked for a better lynch target yet
b. Not voting is bad[/quote]

hmmm. I think I've found a better lynch target.

unvote vote Kaleidoscope

[WhoMe?]

EBWOP

unvote vote Kaleidoscope

preview is my friend.....

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

This is some great logic you threw out there. Definitly see no reason to change my vote at all until the deadline.

[WhoMe?]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]This is some great logic you threw out there. Definitly see no reason to change my vote at all until the deadline.[/quote]

you want me to be clearer? Your tying vote was scummy. How does it benefit town for there to be a tie? just a weak and hence scummy reason for voting. When cal;led on this when the tie situation has gone away, you are leaving your scummy vote in place. I think you are looking scummy and have voted you for it.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

[quote="WhoMe?"][quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]This is some great logic you threw out there. Definitly see no reason to change my vote at all until the deadline.[/quote]

you want me to be clearer? Your tying vote was scummy. How does it benefit town for there to be a tie? just a weak and hence scummy reason for voting. When cal;led on this when the tie situation has gone away, you are leaving your scummy vote in place. I think you are looking scummy and have voted you for it.[/quote]I disagree. If you got a solo person ahead with votes with a deadline nearing, that player will most likely gets lynched. In a tie with two people, the options are still more open. So it is a townie thing to do.

[WhoMe?]

Someone is supposed to get ahead in the voting, the person the town finds most scummy. I see nothing pro-town in keeping the votes tied, this just gives scum the chance to have more influence on the outcome with just one vote.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

I'm treating this day as a day 1 because we had a modkill. I think there isn't a most scummy person already (Aside of Erg0), so I see no need to pile up votes on a player I do not consider more scum then the runner up.

[JDodge]

The WhoMe? bandwagon: Coron, Tamuz, Scopey.

Coron + Tamuz = unlikely to have played with WhoMe? before.

Scopey = loves bandwagons.

So essentially there's one entirely pointless vote and two uninformed votes. Dahill wagon is much better, people.

[WhoMe?]

If this is usual behavior for Kaleidoscope, then I do prefer dahill as a lynch

unvote, revote dahill

[scotmany12]

Vote: Dahill

I still see no solid reason for a whome? lynch. Dahill, on the other hand, is by far much better...

[Tamuz]

Jdodge, you are so bent on this whome? meta. Its kinda sick... Just because you have played with him before doesn't mean you have a 100% read on him, nor does it mean that he is acting the same and aligned the same as in previous games you have had with him. Stop trying to undercut people because they've been in less spamgames than you, or at least less games with the people in this game.

[pickemgenius]

WOO ROCKIES WON VOTECOUNT!

dahill1(4)-Jdodge,Erg0,Whome? scotmany12

WhoMe?(3)-Coron,Tamuz,KaleiÐoscøpe
KaleiÐoscøpe(2)-roffman,chaotic_diablo

NOT VOTING:

dahill1

10 alive 6 to lynch.
DL APRIL 27th ~10PM

[dahill1]

If this is usual behavior for Kaleidoscope, then I do prefer dahill as a lynch

unvote, revote dahill

so you disagree with kscope, but you revote me just because he's usually like this?

vote WhoMe

Vote: Dahill

I still see no solid reason for a whome? lynch. Dahill, on the other hand, is by far much better...

can you explain why?

[chaotic_diablo]

I like my scope vote.

Aside from that, Whome? is at -1. Let's call for a claim.

[Erg0]

WhoMe and dahill are both at lynch-2. dahill reached 4 votes first so he would be the deadline lynch at this point. Why would we be asking WhoMe for a claim?

[JDodge]

Jdodge, you are so bent on this whome? meta. Its kinda sick... Just because you have played with him before doesn't mean you have a 100% read on him, nor does it mean that he is acting the same and aligned the same as in previous games you have had with him. Stop trying to undercut people because they've been in less spamgames than you, or at least less games with the people in this game.

It's "kinda sick" that you're entirely ignoring meta in favour of an uninformed decision. And the whole "nor does it mean he is acting the same and aligned the same" means nothing.

I am not saying WhoMe? is town. Show me where I have.

Stop trying to undercut me by entirely ignoring the premise of my argument and then adding a hefty dose of bullshit onto the top of it.

[Tamuz]

You have implied it by attacking my vote based on that meta.

[JDodge]

You have implied it by attacking my vote based on that meta.

Implication =/= truth.

[Coron]

I'm sticking with my vote on Whome still, he's only strengthened my suspicion.

[Tamuz]

Duh.

You're still attacking my vote based on a silly meta. Therefore you ARE supporting Whome? by attacking votes against him. Did I ever say you said he was innocent? I don't remember, but I don't really recall saying that...

[dahill1]

also Erg0, you did pretty much the same thing for the roffman wagon that you are accusing me of for the dizzy wagon. i was 3rd to vote for dizzy and "following JD" apparently. you were 3rd to vote roffman after it was gaining momentum, and JD also happened to start that wagon

[chaotic_diablo]

WhoMe and dahill are both at lynch-2. dahill reached 4 votes first so he would be the deadline lynch at this point. Why would we be asking WhoMe for a claim?

unvote

vote Whome?

I'm not sure what you're talking about.