Mini #556 - The Most Excellent People Ever - Called.

PJ. · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:50 am

DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:If you don't... well, we have a problem, because I don't believe that in a closed set-up game, he'd not be told he's a miller of any kind. There's a strong case against him.

Since when does knowing your a miller and closed game set-up have anything to do with each other. There are secret mod notes all the times. This game is in coney island you know. Its themed, anything can happen, less rules apply. Now your just reaching.

Unvote, WhoME

if I'm not already voting, quite obviously the scummiest person in the game right now.

Guardian · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:51 am

why do you think so panzer?

WhoMe? · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:06 am

Panzerjager wrote:
DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:If you don't... well, we have a problem, because I don't believe that in a closed set-up game, he'd not be told he's a miller of any kind. There's a strong case against him.
Since when does knowing your a miller and closed game set-up have anything to do with each other. There are secret mod notes all the times. This game is in coney island you know. Its themed, anything can happen, less rules apply. Now your just reaching.

Unvote, WhoME
if I'm not already voting, quite obviously the scummiest person in the game right now.

if that's intended as a vote on me, you need to try again, as you actually only unvoted and didn't revote.

Rosso Carne · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:34 am

DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:Quite possibly:

lovo14 - who hasn't posted in the thread since April 7th and on the forums since April 11th.
Prod, please!

The Jester - who hasn't posted in the thread since Thursday
Cavebear with a toothache - who hasn't psted in the thread since Friday
Thanatos - who hasn't posted in the thread since April 2nd.
Prod, please

I'll take care of these and a VC tonight. Sorry, I've had finals this week, but i have a 3 day lull till my last one (on saturday, ti sucks)

DizzyIzzyB13 · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:49 am

Panzerjager wrote:Since when does knowing your a miller and closed game set-up have anything to do with each other. There are secret mod notes all the times. This game is in coney island you know. Its themed, anything can happen, less rules apply. Now your just reaching.

Not quite. Based on information I've picked up from talking to people and read in threads on this site (this, for example), it appears to me that the general consensus on millers around these parts is that millers should now they're millers unless it's an open set-up in which it is acknowledged that there is a miller amongst the town. Whilst this by no means makes it certain that you aren't a miller, it makes it far more likely in my eyes that you probably aren't, and it strengthens my belief that you are scum.

Korlash · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:35 am

Cavebear wrote:Korlash, you pressed pretty hard for The Jester yesterday, do you think he's still the lynch today?

No, But I still think he is scum.

Guardian · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:39 pm

VC hasn't changed at all.

{1} WhoMe? (Guardian)

{1} Guardian (The Jester)

{3} Panzerjager (DizzyIzzyB13, WhoMe?, Oman)

DizzyIzzyB13 · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:10 pm

Which is a crime. Panzer should have been swinging way before now.

Oman · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:48 pm

Panzer wrote:Since when does knowing your a miller and closed game set-up have anything to do with each other. There are secret mod notes all the times. This game is in coney island you know. Its themed, anything can happen, less rules apply. Now your just reaching.

Unless I feel otherwise, I will follow standard meta.

PJ. · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:15 pm

Fools.

Cavebear with a toothache · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:54 am

Korlash wrote:
Cavebear wrote:Korlash, you pressed pretty hard for The Jester yesterday, do you think he's still the lynch today?
No, But I still think he is scum.

Who, then? Panzer?

Guardian: You missed that Panzer is now voting WhoMe? in your inofficial votecount.

Korlash · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:18 am

*shrugs*

Also Panzer is not voting whome?

Guardian · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:26 am

Cavebear with a toothache wrote:
Korlash wrote:
Cavebear wrote:Korlash, you pressed pretty hard for The Jester yesterday, do you think he's still the lynch today?
No, But I still think he is scum.
Who, then? Panzer?

Guardian: You missed that Panzer is now voting WhoMe? in your inofficial votecount.

Panzer wrote:
Unvote, WhoME

That doesn't seem like a vote to me.

Cavebear with a toothache · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:36 pm

Re: Panzer (not) voting WhoMe: My bad, read too fast.

The Jester · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:30 pm

Apologies, finally read up on the last few pages to clarify.

Unvote

Vote: Panzer

It seems obvious with his "Fools" post, and his non-sense claim.

I should be up to date from now on, unless someone knocks me into a coma.

Guardian · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:00 pm

If Panzer is indeed scum, maybe Izzy really should investigate me, because it would confirm me, and I have defended the heck out of Panzer

.

If Panzer is scum, I think Jester's above post appears strongly that Jester was late to the bus, and Korlash was right all along...

I still think Panzer isn't scum. I think 'fools' was a genuinely frustrated townie. Why does my explanation of how he could be town not make sense?

The Jester · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:52 am

If apples were oranges, why is integral theory complicated?

Translation: The first part has little to do with the second. Ergo, the "If Panzer is scum" - If apples were oranges. How does that show "Think Jester was late to the bus" - Why is Integral theory complicated?

"Korlash was right all along", with what points? Did you see valid ones that you wished to not share to actually make what you said a point and not a "If apples were oranges" statement?

Another example, I think Guardian defending Panzer so much that if Panzer is mafia, I think Guardian's making last-ditch efforts to keep him from being lynched.

Guardian · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:54 am

The above product and/or service is defective.

PJ. · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:57 am

Wow, yeah Jester. Wow man. This guy loves coming Late to the party. It's like he is scum trying to act townie or something

Vote:Jester

Guardian · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:11 am

Panzer you sound a lot like scum in the above post :\.

The Jester · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:52 am

Guardian wrote:The above product and/or service is defective.

Just because there was user-error does not mean the product and or service was/is defective.

If at first you don't succeed, you fail; and the test will be terminated.

Panzer, you sound like are taking drugs awhile ago, are you okay?

I was catching up after being busy with the last few things for school, and I do a lot of stuff for another site, writing/editing articles, so I was working my way to here. With Panzer's weird role claim which I still don't comprehend, and his latest post which sounds like he's high, it seems obvious.

We're putting your scum-buddy out of misery Guardian, don't worry.

Guardian · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:54 am

If Panzer's scum, if there is a doc, protect izzy, and izzy investigate me.

I totally have over-defended panzer if he's scum.

I'm still thinking he's town even with his latish odd actions.

(shrug)

The Jester · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:55 am

EBWOP: I accidentally tried to fix my sentence of past/present relations and hit submit instead of preview. "Panzer, you sound like you took drugs awhile ago, are you okay?"

HoS: Guardian

, start putting reasons/points in your posts or don't post at all, it would be nice and follow the status quo.

Guardian · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:03 am

HoS: Jester

, start putting

logically sound

reasons/points in your posts or don't post at all

The Jester · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:13 am

OMGUS much? Instead of saying 'I disagree with said post' why not add, "This is why I disagree with above post." ?

That was my logically sound reason you seemed to have missed. Even if mine are not logically sound to you specifically, they're at worse, still reasons compared to your "I disagree" contentless-posts.

So Panzer is not mafia to you, summarize why his role-claim makes sense to you? Or does it not? Also, who are you leaning towards as mafia if Panzer is not mafia to you?