Mini 530: Guitar Hero Mafia: It's Finally Over

[TheSweatpantsNinja]

1. The best lynch today would be TSPN, he came off as the most scummy player to me, and I think he is the best option

So, cases are great, I hear.

[CoheedCambria09]

Thank you for pointing out my lack of evidence. I'm sorry for that, but I just had to read through 22 pages of text and it's not the easiest thing to do. As I was reading I was keeping track of things in my head, and you were the person who come off most scummy, which other people must believe as well because Gorrad jumped right on with my idea.

[TheSweatpantsNinja]

Sorry if that came off as personal, I didn't mean it as such. I just can't defend myself if I don't have anything to defend myself against.

[Haschel Cedricson]

...which other people must believe as well because Gorrad jumped right on with my idea.

That doesn't necessarily follow.

[Haschel Cedricson]

EBWOP: So, I've made my feelings about Gorrad's claim rather clear. Are the rest of you in agreement about wanting to test him tonight?

[CoheedCambria09]

I am, as I said in a previosu post.

[Alabaska J]

I am. Of course, if he hits scum or sk (or even a sucky vig) and we lynch town, we lose, I believe.

Also, is it just me, or are CoheedCambria09's posts very, very, very, very suspicious because of their lack of evidence? I'm happy with my vote. Actually, if weren't letting Gorrad live to night to test his ability, I'd vote him for that hugely opportunistic bandwagon jump with zero evidence. :/

[CoheedCambria09]

Your saying I jumped on to a bandwagon?

[TheSweatpantsNinja]

Jumped on, started, semantics. But I'm still waiting for that case.

HC: Yes, I think we should test gorrad's claim, because while I still don't buy it, if he can confirm it, then that would be optimal.

[CoheedCambria09]

I already explained my reasoning for why there is not alot of evidence (daunting task of reading 22 pages) and for the people saying I jumped on a TSPN bandwagon, I don't even know how many votes are on him, I doubt there are any more than 2 or 3, hardly a bandwagon.

[ChaosOmega]

With only 8 people, 3 people voting for a person is fairly significant.

[TheSweatpantsNinja]

I believe there's only two votes on me, gorrad and cc09.

And cc09: Daunting reading is a reason to not immediately post your evidence, because you just read the damn game and you're tired. But if you can't

find

any evidence in 22 pages, then you probably need to reconsider your case.

[Atticus]

Vote Count

Gorrad

(1):

Haschel Cedricson

TheSweatpantsNinja

(3):

ChaosOmega, CoheedCambria09, Gorrad

Thanatos

(1):

hasdgfas

CoheedCambria09

(2):

Alabaska J, TheSweatpantsNinja

Not voting (1): Thanatos

[Alabaska J]

I said Gorrad jumped on a bandwagon. :/ Read please.

Also, as TSPN said, if you can't find evidence in 22 pages, then you don't have a case. Seriously, how is the fact that there are a lot of posts in a game a bad thing evidence-wise?

confirm vote: CoheedCambria09

.

[CoheedCambria09]

Evidence against TSPN has been stated before, its seems a bit outrageous(not the word i wanted to use, but I couldn't think of the synonym i wanted) to have to keep repeating it over and over

[Gorrad]

Evidence against TSPN has been stated before, its seems a bit outrageous(not the word i wanted to use, but I couldn't think of the synonym i wanted) to have to keep repeating it over and over

I support this position, as it's one I often take myself.

[Alabaska J]

Well just repeat it. Gather it all in one place. Make it convenient for everyone to see. Putting it all together will help us define better if you have a case. Also, adding you're own perceptions of the cases would help too, as it prevents it from looking like you just leeched. Gorrad, I fail to see how you can agree with the views of someone when said views have not been truly expressed.

[Gorrad]

Read since the last lynch, focusing on what I've said in regard to HC and TSPN.

[TheSweatpantsNinja]

CC09: Please make your own case. Tell us why you, in reading the game, thought me scummy. Don't hide behind gorrad.

[ChaosOmega]

I wonder if TheSweatpantsNinja and Alabaska J being scum together would be too blatant.

[TheSweatpantsNinja]

Alabaska is mighty friendly toward me, isn't he? I mean, I appreciate it, but it does sort of make me nervous about buddying-up.

[Alabaska J]

I'm not friendly towards you. I just see what CoheedCambria09 as blatant scuminess. If it was directed toward anyone else I would be reacting the same way. ALL HE IS DOING IS LEECHING. No content. :/

[CoheedCambria09]

How is putting the second vote on someone leeching? Wouldnt leeching be considered more if I was the third or fourth vote

[Alabaska J]

Leeching is when you just copy what other people say and don't add any content of your own. In fact, if you had been the third or fourth vote, it wouldn't be leeching, as you would be getting on a discernible wagon. The fact that you are the second vote is more like leeching because there isn't as much of a case TSPN or else we would have had more people voting for him. Because of your second-vote status, I would really like you to go over the evidence you have found pointing towards TSPN and then

add your own opinions/commentary

so we can be sure you aren't just walking in and picking someone. Content is a good thing. Don't be afraid to make long posts.

[Gorrad]

However, DO be afraid to make long posts if you aren't going to have the courtesy of making multiple paragraphs.