Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

Erg0 · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:29 pm

Hooray for softclaims!

He's right, though.

Unvote

for now.

roffman · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:04 pm

yes, softclaims are fun

scotmany12 · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:36 am

Unvote

JDodge · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:56 am

Tamuz wrote:Doing so in a way that I see as scummy is.

I didn't say his defending himself is scummy.

Misreading or misleading others on my words is actually what is scummy. yeah?

"Because I say it's scummy" is not a good reason. Try again, please.

And even still, if he always defends himself in this way, is it a scumtell? You're missing the meta factor here as well.

dahill1 · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:22 am

unvote

whome, is there any particular reason you chose me besides the other people on the roffman wagon?

WhoMe? · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:44 am

dahill1 wrote:
unvote

whome, is there any particular reason you chose me besides the other people on the roffman wagon?

Yes, this post

dahill1 wrote:i'm here
still down for a roffman lynch

was the first push of the roffman wagin after this post.

roffman wrote:
vote kaleidoscop
i'm around 90% certain that ergo isn't scum.

I took your push as being extremely scummy.

dahill1 · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:45 am

they could have been scum-buddies?

WhoMe? · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:50 am

dahill1 wrote:they could have been scum-buddies?

sorry, who could? roffman and Erg or roffman and Kaleidoscope?

Regardless, I'm not saying that a soft claim makes him sacrosanct, but he was already clsoe to lynch, and saying you still want him lynched is scummy. Before lynching a soft claim surely you would press for a full claim first? In this particualr instance where I haven't seen a case against roffman much at all, then I think we would be best served applying pressure elsewhere. You look like a good direction for that pressure to me at the moment.

dahill1 · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:57 am

WhoMe? wrote:
dahill1 wrote:they could have been scum-buddies?
sorry, who could? roffman and Erg or roffman and Kaleidoscope?

Regardless, I'm not saying that a soft claim makes him sacrosanct, but he was already clsoe to lynch, and saying you still want him lynched is scummy. Before lynching a soft claim surely you would press for a full claim first? In this particualr instance where I haven't seen a case against roffman much at all, then I think we would be best served applying pressure elsewhere. You look like a good direction for that pressure to me at the moment.

roffman and ergo
as for the claiming, my thinking is that one always should claim at L-1. sorry if i didn't imply this but of course i still wanted a claim before we lynched him

Erg0 · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:24 pm

WhoMe? wrote:Regardless, I'm not saying that a soft claim makes him sacrosanct, but he was already clsoe to lynch, and saying you still want him lynched is scummy. Before lynching a soft claim surely you would press for a full claim first?

Is this why you softclaimed too?

pickemgenius · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:05 pm

FUCKING STUPID BULLPEN

VOTECOUNT.
(ON A GOOD NOTE HOORAY NEW STORY OF THE YEAR ALBUM!!!!!!)

WhoMe?(3)-Coron,Tamuz,KaleiÐoscøpe

KaleiÐoscøpe(2)-roffman,chaotic_diablo
dahill1(2)-Jdodge,Whome?

NOT VOTING: Erg0,scotmany12,dahill1

10 alive 6 to lynch.

DL APRIL 27th ~10PM

Erg0 · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:08 pm

I like it when the mod reads my mind.

Vote: dahill1

WhoMe? · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:06 pm

Erg0 wrote:
WhoMe? wrote:Regardless, I'm not saying that a soft claim makes him sacrosanct, but he was already clsoe to lynch, and saying you still want him lynched is scummy. Before lynching a soft claim surely you would press for a full claim first?
Is this why you softclaimed too?

I wasn't aware that I had.....

Erg0 · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:58 pm

WhoMe? wrote:
chaotic_diablo wrote:
WhoMe? wrote:
unvote, vote dahill

I am really, really against a roffman lynch and very suspicious of all the pushing on him.
Why? Scot provided a good reason for a roffman wagon.
I would rather not say at this time, but will if pushed.

That's the post I'm referring to.

WhoMe? · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:07 pm

Erg0 wrote:
WhoMe? wrote:
chaotic_diablo wrote:
WhoMe? wrote:
unvote, vote dahill

I am really, really against a roffman lynch and very suspicious of all the pushing on him.
Why? Scot provided a good reason for a roffman wagon.
I would rather not say at this time, but will if pushed.
That's the post I'm referring to.

that was me not wanting to draw undue attention to the softclaim of roffman, which at the time hadn't been commented on.

Erg0 · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:37 pm

Ah, ok - that was when I wasn't sure if he was softclaiming or not, so I presume that you came to that conclusion more quickly than me.

pickemgenius · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:57 pm

DEADLINE IS APRIL 27th ~10 PM

Erg0 · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:03 pm

We should probably have more, like, talking at this point. Day 3 isn't going to be much better if we keep going at this pace.

pickemgenius · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:07 pm

[15] Auto 15 day deadlines. One extension to 20 days will be allowed(majority vote needed). *see rule 5*

Erg0 · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:26 pm

I'm loathe to burn the deadline extension today when we don't seem to have much to discuss. I have a feeling that a few people are hanging back on purpose at this point, so unless we can force them to post there's no point in having extra time.

To be clear for everyone, the rules state that the player with the most votes at deadline will be lynched.

Everybody loves a case, so let's try one on dahill:

- His agreement with the early "tell" on Tamuz was pretty much baseless (as was the tell itself). Voting based on others' crappy cases is scummy.
- Jumped on the dizzyizzy wagon when it looked like gaining momentum.
- Follows JD onto roffman as well.
- "3 scum" comment potentially shows inside info.
- Half-baked theory on me and roffman being buddies.

Ok, now you do one.

dahill1 · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:01 pm

well i voted dizzy mainly because he said "next person to vote me dies" which was pretty damn scummy. i voted roffman because he said the D1 votes were meaningless. and as for the "3 scum" comment, you previously said it wasn't much of a tell, now you're saying it could show possible inside info? hmm..
i don't really strongly believe you and roffman are scumbuddies, but whome said it was scummy that i pushed the roffman BW after he said "i'm 90% ergo isn't scum"
everyone just seemed to believe that but i found no reason why i should particularly

pickemgenius · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:47 pm

IN CASE OF TIE AT DEADLINE, PERSON TO REACH THAT NUMBER FIRST WILL BE LYNCHED.

WhoMe? · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:20 pm

Come on, lets not have a default lynch. If you want to lynch me fine, but get your votes in, a default lynch gives us less info to go on

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:53 am

It's still three days left. Just reading along.

WhoMe? · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 3:56 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]It's still three days left. Just reading along.[/quote]

There's no point me calling on people to be active and register their votes when there's only 10 minutes left is there? Now is as good a time as any for me to communicate that I think a default lynch of anyone is not good.