Loser Mafia (Game Over)

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:46 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:I bet Flameaze and Zoneace are arlmx'z townbuddies. Mark my words.
Lynch me DGB, I can't handle dealing with you anymore!

No! I cannot possibly imagine a game without you. It wouldn't be a game anymore. How can I possibly vote for you?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:48 pm

unvote

- PokerFace is TOO useful. Given that we had leveled serious charges of being useful earlier on, a normal response would have been to correct this behavior, and become chaotic and useless. However, PF sank himself further when trying to find order and try to come up with a strategy. It's obvious that he wants to be lynched. I will not be a party to it.

dahill1 · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:12 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
unvote
- PokerFace is TOO useful. Given that we had leveled serious charges of being useful earlier on, a normal response would have been to correct this behavior, and become chaotic and useless. However, PF sank himself further when trying to find order and try to come up with a strategy. It's obvious that he wants to be lynched. I will not be a party to it.

haha "too townie" actually makes sense in this game

Flameaxe · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:27 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
unvote
- PokerFace is TOO useful. Given that we had leveled serious charges of being useful earlier on, a normal response would have been to correct this behavior, and become chaotic and useless. However, PF sank himself further when trying to find order and try to come up with a strategy. It's obvious that he wants to be lynched. I will not be a party to it.

Doesn't...everyone want to be lynched?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:41 pm

Flameaxe wrote:Doesn't...everyone want to be lynched?

Yes... but how... that is the question!

JDodge · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:59 pm

It's entirely obvious that you should be looking for towntells as scumtells and scumtells as towntells. BBM has committed his personal towntell.

Vote: Flameaxe

Easy easy easy.

Flameaxe · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:10 pm

I intentionally committed my towntell that I have no knowledge of, just for you.

JDodge · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:13 pm

Flameaxe wrote:I intentionally committed my towntell that I have no knowledge of, just for you.

You have no clue how you commit it in the first place. I doubt it's even conscious - seems more like a reflex to me. But it exists nonetheless.

Flameaxe · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:22 pm

JDodge wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:I intentionally committed my towntell that I have no knowledge of, just for you.
You have no clue how you commit it in the first place. I doubt it's even conscious - seems more like a reflex to me. But it exists nonetheless.

I don't know what it is, therefore I don't know why I do it.

armlx · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:27 pm

Jdodge answered PF's question for me. This is typical town Flameaxe, and that is how I know he is town.

Poker needs to live regardless. Lynching intelligent people who are obviously townie hurts our cause as intelligent people are better at finding who is best to lynch. dahills attack of PF makes me feel he is scum. Current bets on his partner are either the Jester (massive bussing attempt) or DGB for also pushing the Poker case, though the later Dodge probably has a better read on.

dahill1 · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:32 pm

armlx wrote:dahills attack of PF

wha?
i voted for him because i think he's town

armlx · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:35 pm

dahill1 wrote:
armlx wrote:dahills attack of PF
wha?
i voted for him because i think he's town

Yet even as a fairly confirmed townie, he is useful alive. We don't have to lynch him today, its not like normal mafia where if the lynch targets live longer town loses more people.

DGB's sea of WIFOM bothers me more than the Jester's anti-bussing, but neither should be lynched any time soon.

dahill1 · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:38 pm

armlx wrote:
dahill1 wrote:
armlx wrote:dahills attack of PF
wha?
i voted for him because i think he's town
Yet even as a fairly confirmed townie, he is useful alive. We don't have to lynch him today, its not like normal mafia where if the lynch targets live longer town loses more people.

DGB's sea of WIFOM bothers me more than the Jester's anti-bussing, but neither should be lynched any time soon.

ok good point

unvote

but i would hardly call that attacking him

ashmite84 · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:54 pm

Sorry guys. I have to go away for a week. Unexpected. Request replacement.

The Jester · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:09 pm

Anti-Bussing?

By the way, thanks for saying bussing as flameaxe already said is done by two members of the same faction. Silly silly don't make sense armlx.

I voted Pokerface page 1, first post of this game. I'm pretty sure mafia wouldn't hardcore attempt to lynch someone like that, if they did-game over. That's called gambling and what have I told you of gambling? Bad, bad Armlx, no allowance for a- I don't give you money, so now you get less than nothing....so there!

armlx · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:13 pm

Yeah, I'm dumb. Bussing doesn't work in this game, as 1 scum dying bussing the other = other lives, GG all.

I think in this game mafia would hard core push for a certain person's lynch. There is not a real punishment for it in this game if that person is town and it just diverts from the real fact they are just removing a strong player from the pool.

The Jester · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:39 pm

No bussing does not, it's been mentioned before.

The real punishment is one less day to have one of them lynched, so there is always a consequence to an action.

A strong player, pssshhh... most townies will eventually get lynched, we're going to get get down to very few townies. What information do you get from a lynch?

So and So was lynched and came up town, do you automatically assume mafia was not on the wagon? Or do you assume they were to avoid suspicion? Or half and half to throw all of us for a loop? Most of it is WIFOM*, well pretty much all of it is.

Connections between people, distancing or otherwise should be watched as well as vote-hopping.

*Non-alcoholic

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:54 am

ashmite84 wrote:
Sorry guys. I have to go away for a week. Unexpected. Request replacement.

I say we lynch this guy while he's gone and can't defend himself.

unvote, vote: ashmite84

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:56 am

armlx wrote:...diverts from the real fact they are just removing a strong player from the pool.

No such suspicion of removing a strong player would be created if we lynched Flameaxe... however I've instituted a "policy no-lynch" of Flameaxe in this game for myself.

ZombieSlayer54 · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:59 am

Armlx: That is exactly WHY I am slightly suspicious of FlameAxe. This IS his regular townie play. But this is an OPPOSITE game. Which leads me to suspect his regular townie play is a disguise of Mafioso.

Also: Dahill, I love your vote jumping. Really do.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:23 am

Zombie, I'd like to point out that you are contrdicting yourself. You have neglected to jump on the ashmite wagon - yet you profess to love dahill's vote jumping.

ZombieSlayer54 · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:35 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:Zombie, I'd like to point out that you are contrdicting yourself. You have neglected to jump on the ashmite wagon - yet you profess to love dahill's vote jumping.

I was being sarcastic.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:41 am

ZombieSlayer54 wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:Zombie, I'd like to point out that you are contrdicting yourself. You have neglected to jump on the ashmite wagon - yet you profess to love dahill's vote jumping.
I was being sarcastic.

So you think mindless bandwagoners should be lynched in this game? Please explain the logic.

armlx · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 4:20 am

ZombieSlayer: Tells don't work like that.

ZombieSlayer54 · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:01 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
ZombieSlayer54 wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:Zombie, I'd like to point out that you are contrdicting yourself. You have neglected to jump on the ashmite wagon - yet you profess to love dahill's vote jumping.
I was being sarcastic.
So you think mindless bandwagoners should be lynched in this game? Please explain the logic.

When did I say that?