td - 1 (WeyounsLastClone)
Not Voting - 5 (BridgesAndBaloons, cerebus3, curiouskarmadog, JimSauce, Radio_Interference)
By 1 vote? Aw c'mon JS you know better. Saying he's close to a lynch is a stretch beyond imagination.JimSauce wrote:Relatively close, in that he's closer to a lynch than anyone else.
That was not my point, and I am done repeating myself. Good job reading my last post though.WLC wrote: And then he ends with: 'I still maintain that Muerrto's argument is suspicious, but in order for him to be scum, Bab would have to be town, which at this point I doubt.'. Which is about what Muerrto was doing, and where he attacked him for...
Do you see any other candidates for a lynch right now?Muerrto wrote:By 1 vote? Aw c'mon JS you know better. Saying he's close to a lynch is a stretch beyond imagination.JimSauce wrote:Relatively close, in that he's closer to a lynch than anyone else.
No, but the way he said it sounded as if he was trying to bring suspiscion on me for BaB being 'relatively close to a lynch'. Which is BS, he's at 2, lynch -3.cerebus3 wrote:Do you see any other candidates for a lynch right now?Muerrto wrote:By 1 vote? Aw c'mon JS you know better. Saying he's close to a lynch is a stretch beyond imagination.JimSauce wrote:Relatively close, in that he's closer to a lynch than anyone else.
Naw, td added since the original argument, lynch -2 now, still quite safe unless the mafia plans on outing themselvesRadio_Interference wrote:krrzzt....[Muerrto]The count says Bab is at L-2 right now. Is that one incorrect?
If you're town, wouldn't it be a 2/8*3=3/4 chance? Anyway, I don't think you could use those probabilities too realistically, because I guess that scum will approach it differently than town. That said, I often get the idea scum are at the start of a bandwagon, rather than on the end.BridgesAndBaloons wrote: There's a very likely chance ( 2/3 of a chance. 2/9 * 3 = 2/3) that at least one mafia member is voting for me.
I still don't see how a statement like `but everything else can be too, given the right circumstances' actually makes it impossible to see `where he was coming from.' As far as I'm concerned, thatRadio_Interference wrote:He listed three scumtells, but by making that statement didn't answer his question so that we could see where he "was coming from" with his scumtells.
`Otherwise' as in `isn't a townie' or in `isn't misguided?'WeyounsLastClone wrote:I'm still leaning towards BaB as a sometimes misguided townie, but he does make a good job of trying to convince me to think otherwise, because it seems he's trying a different angle, once the previous way doesn't seem to work.
Um...if there's scum on you you're even safer, yes? Bad argument # 347.BridgesAndBaloons wrote:That's quite an assumption. There's a very likely chance ( 2/3 of a chance. 2/9 * 3 = 2/3) that at least one mafia member is voting for me. I'm not saying this is absolutely happening, but the fact that you so easily call everyone who is voting for me town is a HUGE ASSUMPTION. You should know better. Maybe I'm misreading what you wrote.
BaB has been doing a lot more agreeing than voting, actually. He never actually voted me, for instance. It's hard to tell either way, though, as with this town being so hesitant to vote there haven't been a lot of bandwagons to jump on. (The Occult is, I think, the only substantial one so far.) From the same post:Muerrto wrote:There's alot of differences between newbie town and newbie scum. BaB came into the game guns blazing and calling out Occult for weak reasons. Occult just happened to be the flavor of the month at the time. Later, when you expressed concern with Amor, he decided that he also thought Amor was scummy. Following bandwagons is definitely a newbie scum tell. While a newbie towncoulddo that as well, I'd see them more agreeing with others rather than simply jumping to votes. On top of that most newbie town agree with the IC's, not the other newbies.
* I have no idea what WIFOM means anymoreMuerrto wrote:Is all this WIFOM? Of course because every person is different and plays and acts differently. But that's what compromises 'tells', things that scum/town/newbie etc wouldnormallydo.
Muerrto wrote:There's alot of differences between newbie town and newbie scum. BaB came into the game guns blazing and calling out Occult for weak reasons. Occult just happened to be the flavor of the month at the time. Later, when you expressed concern with Amor, he decided that he also thought Amor was scummy. Following bandwagons is definitely a newbie scum tell. While a newbie towncoulddo that as well, I'd see them more agreeing with others rather than simply jumping to votes. On top of that most newbie town agree with the IC's, not the other newbies.
Is all this WIFOM? Of course because every person is different and plays and acts differently. But that's what compromises 'tells', things that scum/town/newbie etc wouldnormallydo. BaB falls more into the newbie scum than the newbie town, therefore I suspect him.
He's also flaunted the fact he's a newbie numerous times, at points that weren't even necessary, as a defense against the mistakes he's made. While a newbie town would do this to avoid the noose, BaB's never been anywhere near the noose and has done it to remove suspiscion, that's newbie scum. It hasn't worked.
Sadly, almost everyone's convinced by his play and has labelled him the 'VI' and granted him immunity from being scum. An extremely dangerous decision. While his play has been random at times and his posts are definitely not organized in any way, how do either of those prevent him from simply being newbie scum panicing?
The randomness and jumbled thoughts are his obvious newbie tells, the vote hopping and wolf calling are his scum tells, where are his town tells that have you and others convinced? You guys are saying his newbie tells make him town. His newbie tells make him new, nothing more.
really two weeks? I havent posted any big posts for two weeks? I havent provided any long posts with content in two weeks? you really want to keep pushing that amor? I think that if you compare my posts versus your posts in this game since I replaced in your will find a huge difference in content and posting.Amor wrote:Not much substantial to reply to, but I'll give it a shot. BaB and CKD's upcoming big posts should provide us with some content at least
* On that note, CKD has been apparently getting caught up on the game for at least two weeks now.
*
That point wasn't in response to you, it was to a couple of other people talking about the odds of scum voting BaB... BaB posted them and then WLC and td argued about whether they were correct. I really don't think they're useful in the first place.Muerrto wrote:I'm not sure where I used numerical odds to say BaB is scum...could you quote it? Or where I said everyone has equal odds of being mafia...
Maybe you meant to quote someone else?
You have made a few long posts in this time, true. But two weeks ago was the earliest "need to get caught up, will post X later" (in this case the second part of the reply to BaB) post where you still haven't posted X. Now you're promising us a case when you get caught up. You seem to promise a lot of things and keep delaying them.curiouskarmadog wrote:really two weeks? I havent posted any big posts for two weeks? I havent provided any long posts with content in two weeks? you really want to keep pushing that amor? I think that if you compare my posts versus your posts in this game since I replaced in your will find a huge difference in content and posting.
I need time to reread thoroughly and post my case...
I actually checked your recent posts and you seemed to be posting a lot in other threads, which was what set off alarm bells for me. Looking at the content of the posts, you have mentioned needing to reread once or twice, but you still are posting more often than you are in this thread. I may do a deeper reading later.curiouskarmadog wrote:if you meta, you will find that I have posted in SEVERAL threads that I need to reread and will post something soon...I am keeping up with the thread, but havent had the time to do more than that...I will get to it in the next couple of days.
Sorry, but when I see statistics that are so obviously wrong, I can't let them stand uncorrected.Amor wrote:That point wasn't in response to you, it was to a couple of other people talking about the odds of scum voting BaB... BaB posted them and then WLC and td argued about whether they were correct. I really don't think they're useful in the first place.
Not that I want to excuse my lurking, because I know I should post more, to keep discussions going, and get discussions started, but I do want to make a counterpoint. Let's assume you're town, where did all your postings get you? You're one of the more suspected people in this game. I'm not saying that's bad, I actually admire your dedication to this game, and the number of things you come up with. But it's your way of playing/feeling. I do read the game through, but after I've read I don't always have time to construct a coherent post, or think my thought won't help but rather hurt the game, so my way of playing is to what might come across as lurking. I actually do feel bad sometimes because I can't find good arguments, but I do understand how town can lurk in a game. I feel it's easier for scum, because they know what's happening, and they can insinuate rather than investigate.BridgesAndBaloons wrote:I really really am feeling awful that I haven't been posting so much lately. I've really only had a couple of minutes to read some stuff and post status updates. I don't understand how town can lurk in the game. I just feel really bad that I'm not helping right now.